Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
/home/mcc/execution
total 180K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 339 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 15 18:50 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 15 18:50 model.pnml
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3637
Executing tool irma4mcc-structural
Input is FMS-PT-200, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r091-blw7-152650003300089
=====================================================================

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1527184454917


BK_STOP 1527184497961

--------------------
content from stderr:

Prefix is 75f5f979.
Reading known information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-known.json.
Reading learned information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-learned.json.
Reading value translations in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-values.json.
Using directory /home/mcc/execution for input, as it contains a model.pnml file.
Using FMS-PT-200 as instance name.
Using FMS as model name.
Using algorithm or tool bmdt.
Model characteristics are: {'Examination': 'ReachabilityCardinality', 'Place/Transition': True, 'Colored': False, 'Relative-Time': 1, 'Relative-Memory': 1, 'Ordinary': True, 'Simple Free Choice': False, 'Extended Free Choice': False, 'State Machine': False, 'Marked Graph': False, 'Connected': True, 'Strongly Connected': True, 'Source Place': False, 'Sink Place': False, 'Source Transition': False, 'Sink Transition': False, 'Loop Free': False, 'Conservative': False, 'Sub-Conservative': False, 'Nested Units': False, 'Safe': False, 'Deadlock': False, 'Reversible': None, 'Quasi Live': True, 'Live': None}.
Known tools are: [{'Time': 135, 'Memory': 112.8, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 195, 'Memory': 111.53, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 254139, 'Memory': 3987.87, 'Tool': 'itstools'}, {'Time': 260726, 'Memory': 3981.49, 'Tool': 'itstools'}, {'Time': 1768917, 'Memory': 15952.98, 'Tool': 'marcie'}, {'Time': 1790783, 'Memory': 15953.18, 'Tool': 'marcie'}].
Learned tools are: [{'Tool': 'itstools'}].
Learned tool itstools is 1882.5111111111112x far from the best tool lola.
ReachabilityCardinality lola FMS-PT-200...

Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
----- Start make prepare stderr -----
===========================================================================================
FMS-PT-200: translating PT Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating PT Petri net complete


checking for too many tokens
===========================================================================================
FMS-PT-200: translating PT formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating formula complete
touch formulae;
----- Start make result stdout -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ FMS-PT-200 @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stdout -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 42/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 22 places, 20 transitions, 16 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 24 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: E (F ((P1 <= P1wM1))) : A (G (((P3M2 <= 2) OR (P1wP2 + 1 <= P1) OR (P1s <= P1d)))) : E (F (((2 <= P12M3) AND (P1 <= P3)))) : A (G (((P12M3 <= 1) OR (P1wM1 <= 1)))) : E (F (((2 <= P12s) AND (1 <= P2s)))) : A (G (())) : E (F (((P12wM3 <= M2) AND (P12M3 <= P12) AND (P2 <= P3M2) AND (1 <= P12M3) AND (2 <= P12s) AND (M2 <= P1d)))) : A (G ((P2M2 <= M3))) : A (G (TRUE)) : A (G (((P12s + 1 <= M3) OR (M1 <= 2) OR ((P1wP2 + 1 <= P2d) AND (M1 + 1 <= P1))))) : E (F (((3 <= P1d)))) : A (G (((P12M3 <= P1s) OR ((P12wM3 + 1 <= P2wP1) AND (M1 <= 2))))) : E (F (((M1 <= P12s) AND (1 <= P2) AND (2 <= M2) AND (M1 <= P2) AND ((P3 + 1 <= P2s) OR (M3 + 1 <= P2wP1))))) : E (F ((((2 <= P1s) OR ((2 <= M3) AND (P3s <= P12s))) AND (3 <= P2wP1)))) : A (G (((P1wM1 <= 1) OR (P12wM3 + 1 <= P1d) OR (P12 <= 0)))) : E (F (((P12wM3 <= 1) AND (3 <= P12M3))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((P1 <= P1wM1)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 101 markings, 100 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((P3M2 <= 2) OR (P1wP2 + 1 <= P1) OR (P1s <= P1d))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 207 markings, 206 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= P12M3) AND (P1 <= P3))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 23 markings, 22 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((P12M3 <= 1) OR (P1wM1 <= 1))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 25 markings, 24 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= P12s) AND (1 <= P2s))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 29 markings, 28 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (()))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 22 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((P12wM3 <= M2) AND (P12M3 <= P12) AND (P2 <= P3M2) AND (1 <= P12M3) AND (2 <= P12s) AND (M2 <= P1d))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 2449 markings, 2457 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((P2M2 <= M3)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-7.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-7.sara.

lola: state equation: solution produced
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (TRUE))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 22 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: 0 markings, 0 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((P12s + 1 <= M3) OR (M1 <= 2) OR ((P1wP2 + 1 <= P2d) AND (M1 + 1 <= P1)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 23 markings, 22 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= P1d))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 10 markings, 9 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((P12M3 <= P1s) OR ((P12wM3 + 1 <= P2wP1) AND (M1 <= 2)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 35 markings, 42 edges
lola: ========================================
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara.
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((M1 <= P12s) AND (1 <= P2) AND (2 <= M2) AND (M1 <= P2) AND ((P3 + 1 <= P2s) OR (M3 + 1 <= P2wP1)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 10 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas

lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara.

lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((2 <= P1s) OR ((2 <= M3) AND (P3s <= P12s))) AND (3 <= P2wP1))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 5 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 13 markings, 12 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-13.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((P1wM1 <= 1) OR (P12wM3 + 1 <= P1d) OR (P12 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 814 markings, 817 edges
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((P12wM3 <= 1) AND (3 <= P12M3))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara.

lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes no yes no yes yes yes no yes no yes no no yes no no
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-0 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-1 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-3 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-4 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-5 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-8 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-200-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stderr -----
----- Finished stdout -----

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="FMS-PT-200"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="irma4mcc-structural"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/FMS-PT-200.tgz
mv FMS-PT-200 execution
cd execution
pwd
ls -lh

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3637"
echo " Executing tool irma4mcc-structural"
echo " Input is FMS-PT-200, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r091-blw7-152650003300089"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;