fond
Model Checking Contest 2018
8th edition, Bratislava, Slovakia, June 26, 2018
Execution of r091-blw7-152650003300082
Last Updated
June 26, 2018

About the Execution of Irma.struct for FMS-PT-100

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
429.470 43226.00 4779.00 166.60 TFFFFFTTTTTFFTTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
/home/mcc/execution
total 172K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 15 18:50 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 339 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 15 18:50 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:50 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 15 18:50 model.pnml
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3637
Executing tool irma4mcc-structural
Input is FMS-PT-100, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r091-blw7-152650003300082
=====================================================================


--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1527183729049


BK_STOP 1527183772275

--------------------
content from stderr:

Prefix is 75f5f979.
Reading known information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-known.json.
Reading learned information in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-learned.json.
Reading value translations in /usr/share/mcc4mcc/75f5f979-values.json.
Using directory /home/mcc/execution for input, as it contains a model.pnml file.
Using FMS-PT-100 as instance name.
Using FMS as model name.
Using algorithm or tool bmdt.
Model characteristics are: {'Examination': 'ReachabilityCardinality', 'Place/Transition': True, 'Colored': False, 'Relative-Time': 1, 'Relative-Memory': 1, 'Ordinary': True, 'Simple Free Choice': False, 'Extended Free Choice': False, 'State Machine': False, 'Marked Graph': False, 'Connected': True, 'Strongly Connected': True, 'Source Place': False, 'Sink Place': False, 'Source Transition': False, 'Sink Transition': False, 'Loop Free': False, 'Conservative': False, 'Sub-Conservative': False, 'Nested Units': False, 'Safe': False, 'Deadlock': False, 'Reversible': None, 'Quasi Live': True, 'Live': None}.
Known tools are: [{'Time': 146, 'Memory': 112.52, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 183, 'Memory': 113.09, 'Tool': 'lola'}, {'Time': 5489, 'Memory': 356.43, 'Tool': 'itstools'}, {'Time': 5793, 'Memory': 352.92, 'Tool': 'itstools'}, {'Time': 941747, 'Memory': 15950.52, 'Tool': 'marcie'}, {'Time': 971617, 'Memory': 15950.17, 'Tool': 'marcie'}].
Learned tools are: [{'Tool': 'itstools'}].
Learned tool itstools is 37.5958904109589x far from the best tool lola.
ReachabilityCardinality lola FMS-PT-100...

Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
----- Start make prepare stderr -----
===========================================================================================
FMS-PT-100: translating PT Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating PT Petri net complete


checking for too many tokens
===========================================================================================
FMS-PT-100: translating PT formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating formula complete
touch formulae;
----- Start make result stdout -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ FMS-PT-100 @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stdout -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 42/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 22 places, 20 transitions, 16 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 24 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: E (F (((P12 + 1 <= P12s) OR (P1 + 1 <= M2) OR (P3 + 1 <= P1s)))) : A (G ((P12 <= P2wP1))) : A (G (((P2d + 1 <= M1) OR (P12s <= P1M1)))) : A (G ((3 <= P2))) : A (G ((P12wM3 <= M1))) : A (G ((1 <= P1))) : E (F (((1 <= M1) AND (P3 <= 0)))) : E (F (((P1d + 1 <= P3s) AND (P3M2 + 1 <= P2M2) AND (P3 <= 2) AND (P2 + 1 <= P2wP1)))) : E (F ((((1 <= P3s) AND (3 <= M3) AND (2 <= P12) AND (P3s <= P1wP2)) OR ((P3 <= M3) AND (P1M1 <= P3))))) : E (F ((P1 <= P1d))) : A (G (((3 <= M1) OR (P2d <= P12) OR (P2s <= P2M2) OR (2 <= P2wP1) OR (P12 <= P2d)))) : A (G (((P1wP2 + 1 <= P1wM1) OR (P12M3 <= 1) OR (((3 <= M2) OR (P12M3 <= P1M1)) AND (P2M2 <= 1))))) : A (G ((P2s <= 2))) : E (F (((3 <= M2) OR (P1 <= P12M3)))) : E (F (((P12s <= P1M1) AND (P2wP1 <= P2) AND (P3s <= P2) AND (P1 <= P1wM1) AND (3 <= P3)))) : E (F (((2 <= P12) AND (2 <= M3) AND (P1wM1 <= P1) AND (P12M3 <= P1wM1) AND ((2 <= P2s) OR (1 <= P12s)) AND ((3 <= M3) OR (2 <= P3M2)))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((P12 + 1 <= P12s) OR (P1 + 1 <= M2) OR (P3 + 1 <= P1s))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 3 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 101 markings, 100 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((P12 <= P2wP1)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 10 markings, 9 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((P2d + 1 <= M1) OR (P12s <= P1M1))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 329 markings, 330 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((3 <= P2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 99 markings, 98 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality.sara.
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara.
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((P12wM3 <= M1)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara
lola: lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 320 markings, 322 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((1 <= P1)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: 101 markings, 100 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= M1) AND (P3 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 101 markings, 100 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
sara: lola: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara.
...considering subproblem: E (F (((P1d + 1 <= P3s) AND (P3M2 + 1 <= P2M2) AND (P3 <= 2) AND (P2 + 1 <= P2wP1))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-7.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 506 markings, 506 edges
lola: ========================================
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara.
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((1 <= P3s) AND (3 <= M3) AND (2 <= P12) AND (P3s <= P1wP2)) OR ((P3 <= M3) AND (P1M1 <= P3)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 99 markings, 98 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((P1 <= P1d)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 101 markings, 100 edges
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara.
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((3 <= M1) OR (P2d <= P12) OR (P2s <= P2M2) OR (2 <= P2wP1) OR (P12 <= P2d))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 5 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara.
sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara.







lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((P1wP2 + 1 <= P1wM1) OR (P12M3 <= 1) OR (((3 <= M2) OR (P12M3 <= P1M1)) AND (P2M2 <= 1)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 7 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara
lola: 23 markings, 22 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((P2s <= 2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: 13 markings, 12 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= M2) OR (P1 <= P12M3))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-13.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 101 markings, 100 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((P12s <= P1M1) AND (P2wP1 <= P2) AND (P3s <= P2) AND (P1 <= P1wM1) AND (3 <= P3))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: sara: try reading problem file FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara.
Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 5 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 51 markings, 50 edges
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= P12) AND (2 <= M3) AND (P1wM1 <= P1) AND (P12M3 <= P1wM1) AND ((2 <= P2s) OR (1 <= P12s)) AND ((3 <= M3) OR (2 <= P3M2)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 64 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 24 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara

lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: 34 markings, 33 edges
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes no no no no no yes yes yes yes yes no no yes yes yes
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-0 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-1 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-2 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-3 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-4 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-5 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-7 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-8 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-9 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA FMS-PT-100-ReachabilityCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Finished stderr -----
----- Finished stdout -----

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="FMS-PT-100"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="irma4mcc-structural"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/FMS-PT-100.tgz
mv FMS-PT-100 execution
cd execution
pwd
ls -lh

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3637"
echo " Executing tool irma4mcc-structural"
echo " Input is FMS-PT-100, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r091-blw7-152650003300082"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;