About the Execution of ITS-Tools for AutoFlight-PT-02b
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 15754.900 | 1015845.00 | 1036778.00 | 6445.20 | TFFTFTTTFTFFTFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................
/home/mcc/execution
total 204K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 15 18:54 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 15 18:54 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 15 18:49 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 15 18:49 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 15 18:54 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 15 18:54 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 346 May 15 18:54 ReachabilityDeadlock.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 15 18:54 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 15 18:54 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:49 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 15 18:49 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 15 18:49 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 15 18:49 model.pnml
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3637
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r020-qhx1-152646244300074
=====================================================================
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1526851663909
Invoking ITS tools like this :CommandLine [args=[/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.201805151631/bin/its-ctl-linux64, --gc-threshold, 2000000, --quiet, -i, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal, -t, CGAL, -ctl, /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl], workingDir=/home/mcc/execution]
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.201805151631/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal -t CGAL -ctl /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.
built 34 ordering constraints for composite.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61545e+13,1.72926,30204,1852,797,38353,1519,232,90808,184,11336,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((!((u16.p91>=1)&&(u24.p137>=1)))&&((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1))) * (AX((u16.p97>=1)) + (((u18.p117>=1)||(u16.p100>=1))&&((u15.p87>=1)&&(u11.p30>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((!((u16.p91>=1)&&(u24.p137>=1)))&&((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1)))) * !(EX(!((u16.p97>=1)))))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((!((u16.p91>=1)&&(u24.p137>=1)))&&((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1)))) * (((u18.p117>=1)||(u16.p100>=1))&&((u15.p87>=1)&&(u11.p30>=1))))] != FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t73, t89, t196, t197, t198, t199, u10.t0, u10.t1, u10.t2, u10.t162, u10.t169, u11.t3, u11.t4, u11.t5, u11.t153, u11.t160, u12.t6, u12.t7, u12.t8, u12.t9, u12.t142, u12.t150, u13.t10, u13.t11, u13.t12, u13.t130, u13.t137, u14.t13, u14.t14, u14.t15, u14.t120, u14.t127, u15.t16, u15.t17, u15.t18, u15.t19, u15.t109, u15.t117, u16.t94, u16.t104, u17.t91, u18.t78, u18.t88, u19.t75, u24.t69, u24.t72, u25.t57, u25.t60, u26.t50, u26.t53, u27.t38, u27.t41, u28.t29, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0/151/53/204
(forward)formula 0,1,4.72719,70504,1,0,144289,10039,1341,170970,1085,52512,401319
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (AF(AX(((u14.p62>=1)||(u24.p135>=1)))) * E(((!(u11.p32>=1))||((u24.p130>=1)&&(u28.p204>=1))) U !((u15.p73>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((u14.p62>=1)||(u24.p135>=1)))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(((!(u11.p32>=1))||((u24.p130>=1)&&(u28.p204>=1))) U !((u15.p73>=1)))))] = FALSE)
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
(forward)formula 1,0,54.6701,716500,1,0,1.3301e+06,19397,1674,2.0366e+06,1336,165452,2363529
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: !(EF(((u10.p20>=1)&&(u26.p172>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((u10.p20>=1)&&(u26.p172>=1)))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 2,0,54.6777,716764,1,0,1.33012e+06,19397,1679,2.03685e+06,1336,165452,2364589
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((u10.p21>=1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (u10.p21>=1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 3,1,54.694,717028,1,0,1.33012e+06,19397,1680,2.03828e+06,1336,165452,2366334
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (((AX(((u15.p78>=1)&&(u26.p179>=1))) * EF(((u27.p185>=1)||(u14.p68>=1)))) * !(EG(((u35.p8>=1)||(u14.p68>=1))))) + (AF(AX(((u13.p55>=1)&&(u24.p142>=1)))) + ((u18.p107>=1)&&(!((u12.p46>=1)&&(u25.p156>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !(((!(EX(!(((u15.p78>=1)&&(u26.p179>=1))))) * E(TRUE U ((u27.p185>=1)||(u14.p68>=1)))) * !(EG(((u35.p8>=1)||(u14.p68>=1))))))) * !(((u18.p107>=1)&&(!((u12.p46>=1)&&(u25.p156>=1)))))),!(!(EX(!(((u13.p55>=1)&&(u24.p142>=1)))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 4,0,101.781,1274620,1,0,2.30133e+06,30347,1827,4.02089e+06,1354,230539,3432915
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: !(AF((u18.p115>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((u18.p115>=1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 5,1,103.487,1300756,1,0,2.34244e+06,30432,2020,4.11378e+06,1469,232502,3560190
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((A(((u15.p85>=1)&&(u25.p157>=1)) U (u19.p121>=1)) + (u10.p21>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((u19.p121>=1))))) * !(E(!((u19.p121>=1)) U (!(((u15.p85>=1)&&(u25.p157>=1))) * !((u19.p121>=1))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (u10.p21>=1))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 6,1,271.559,2202112,1,0,3.74598e+06,31873,529,7.25364e+06,508,250849,757700
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(!(AX((u24.p150>=1))) U (u25.p155>=1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((u24.p150>=1)))))) * (u25.p155>=1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 7,1,300.611,2202112,1,0,3.74598e+06,31873,636,7.25364e+06,558,250849,2009310
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (AF(((((u12.p42>=1)&&(u16.p97>=1))||(u14.p64>=1))||((u26.p180>=1)||((u39.p124>=1)&&(u11.p32>=1))))) + EG((AG((u30.p3>=1)) + !(((u18.p114>=1)||(u17.p103>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EG((!(E(TRUE U !((u30.p3>=1)))) + !(((u18.p114>=1)||(u17.p103>=1))))))),!(((((u12.p42>=1)&&(u16.p97>=1))||(u14.p64>=1))||((u26.p180>=1)||((u39.p124>=1)&&(u11.p32>=1))))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 8,0,507.503,2432052,1,0,3.98627e+06,32156,826,7.87252e+06,680,250849,1690298
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (EG(!((((u13.p61>=1)||(u10.p12>=1))&&((u18.p109>=1)||(u16.p101>=1))))) * (!(((!((u14.p70>=1)&&(u14.p65>=1)))&&((u16.p94>=1)&&(((u10.p16>=1)&&(u24.p141>=1))||(u16.p100>=1))))) + EX(AG((u18.p115>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * EG(!((((u13.p61>=1)||(u10.p12>=1))&&((u18.p109>=1)||(u16.p101>=1)))))) * !(((!((u14.p70>=1)&&(u14.p65>=1)))&&((u16.p94>=1)&&(((u10.p16>=1)&&(u24.p141>=1))||(u16.p100>=1))))))] != FALSE + [(EY((Init * EG(!((((u13.p61>=1)||(u10.p12>=1))&&((u18.p109>=1)||(u16.p101>=1))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((u18.p115>=1)))))] != FALSE)
(forward)formula 9,1,625.697,2668596,1,0,4.33192e+06,32156,1041,9.14385e+06,765,250849,3645302
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: AF(((u15.p73>=1) * ((u10.p13>=1) + AG((u12.p42>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((u15.p73>=1) * ((u10.p13>=1) + !(E(TRUE U !((u12.p42>=1))))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 10,0,718.296,2675460,1,0,4.34485e+06,32156,515,9.16914e+06,476,250849,1484585
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (((EX((u13.p59>=1)) * (EF((u29.p2>=1)) + AF((u12.p42>=1)))) * A((u11.p30>=1) U ((u31.p4>=1)||(u12.p35>=1)))) + A(!((((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1))||(u10.p18>=1))) U (u10.p14>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((Init * !(!((E(!((u10.p14>=1)) U (!(!((((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1))||(u10.p18>=1)))) * !((u10.p14>=1)))) + EG(!((u10.p14>=1))))))) * !(EX((u13.p59>=1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(((Init * !(!((E(!((u10.p14>=1)) U (!(!((((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1))||(u10.p18>=1)))) * !((u10.p14>=1)))) + EG(!((u10.p14>=1))))))) * !(E(TRUE U (u29.p2>=1)))),!((u12.p42>=1)))] = FALSE) * ([(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((u10.p14>=1)) U (!(!((((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1))||(u10.p18>=1)))) * !((u10.p14>=1)))) + EG(!((u10.p14>=1))))))),!(((u31.p4>=1)||(u12.p35>=1)))) * (!((u11.p30>=1)) * !(((u31.p4>=1)||(u12.p35>=1)))))] = FALSE * [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!((u10.p14>=1)) U (!(!((((u24.p143>=1)&&(u28.p202>=1))||(u10.p18>=1)))) * !((u10.p14>=1)))) + EG(!((u10.p14>=1))))))),!(((u31.p4>=1)||(u12.p35>=1))))] = FALSE))
(forward)formula 11,0,786.442,2675460,1,0,4.34485e+06,32156,1083,9.16914e+06,778,250849,2978041
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: EF(AG(((!(u18.p111>=1))||(u10.p12>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(u18.p111>=1))||(u10.p12>=1))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 12,1,792.908,2675460,1,0,4.34485e+06,32156,1154,9.16914e+06,779,250849,3187461
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EX(AF(EX((u12.p50>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX((u12.p50>=1))))))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 13,0,988.645,2950812,1,0,4.94999e+06,34028,622,9.56115e+06,556,260039,1066496
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: AX(!((EF((u12.p49>=1)) + (((u27.p191>=1)&&(u25.p152>=1))||(((u13.p55>=1)&&(u24.p142>=1))||((u12.p43>=1)&&(u24.p139>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (u12.p49>=1))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * (((u27.p191>=1)&&(u25.p152>=1))||(((u13.p55>=1)&&(u24.p142>=1))||((u12.p43>=1)&&(u24.p139>=1)))))] = FALSE)
(forward)formula 14,0,989.838,2950812,1,0,4.94999e+06,34028,867,9.56115e+06,680,260039,1193256
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: ((((u10.p22>=1)&&(!(u16.p99>=1)))&&(!((u14.p71>=1)&&(u10.p18>=1)))) + AF((AG((u16.p90>=1)) * (((u24.p149>=1)||((u27.p187>=1)&&(u28.p204>=1)))||((u10.p18>=1)||(u18.p119>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((((u10.p22>=1)&&(!(u16.p99>=1)))&&(!((u14.p71>=1)&&(u10.p18>=1)))))),!((!(E(TRUE U !((u16.p90>=1)))) * (((u24.p149>=1)||((u27.p187>=1)&&(u28.p204>=1)))||((u10.p18>=1)||(u18.p119>=1))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 15,0,994.605,2950812,1,0,4.94999e+06,34028,1114,9.56115e+06,778,260039,1464584
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
BK_STOP 1526852679754
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -smt
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//itstools/its-tools -consoleLog -data /home/mcc/execution/workspace -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsminpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/ -smt -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=/tmp/.eclipse -Xss8m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application start
INFO: Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsminpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit//lts_install_dir/, -smt]
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator transformPNML
INFO: Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.nupn.PTNetReader loadFromXML
INFO: Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 98 ms
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PTGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: Transformed 206 places.
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PTGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: Transformed 204 transitions.
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PnmlToGalTransformer transform
INFO: Found NUPN structural information;
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil systemToFile
INFO: Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml.img.gal : 21 ms
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.MccTranslator applyOrder
INFO: Applying decomposition
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder decomposeWithOrder
INFO: Decomposing Gal with order
May 20, 2018 9:28:01 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.GALRewriter flatten
INFO: Flatten gal took : 85 ms
May 20, 2018 9:28:02 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder rewriteArraysToAllowPartition
INFO: Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
May 20, 2018 9:28:02 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.Instantiator fuseIsomorphicEffects
INFO: Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
May 20, 2018 9:28:02 PM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil systemToFile
INFO: Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.pnml.gal : 16 ms
May 20, 2018 9:28:02 PM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil serializePropertiesForITSCTLTools
INFO: Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.ctl : 4 ms
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-02b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-02b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-02b execution
cd execution
pwd
ls -lh
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3637"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r020-qhx1-152646244300074"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;