fond
Model Checking Contest @ Petri Nets 2017
7th edition, Zaragoza, Spain, June 27, 2017
Execution of r208-smll-149581172200052
Last Updated
June 27, 2017

About the Execution of LoLA for Referendum-COL-0010

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
107.590 194.00 40.00 2.50 TFTFFFTFTTTFTFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3254
Executing tool lola
Input is Referendum-COL-0010, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r208-smll-149581172200052
=====================================================================


--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-0
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-1
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-2
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-3
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-4
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-5
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-6
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-7
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-8
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-9

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1496300470397


Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
===========================================================================================
Referendum-COL-0010: translating COL Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating COL Petri net complete
checking for too many tokens
===========================================================================================
Referendum-COL-0010: translating COL formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating formula complete
----- Start make result stdout -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ Referendum-COL-0010 @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stdout -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 52/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 31 places, 21 transitions, 21 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 13 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: A (G (())) : E (F (((1 <= p0) AND ((1 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30) OR (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20)) AND (p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20 + 1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10)))) : A (G (((p0 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20) OR (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= 0) OR (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= 2)))) : A (G ((p0 <= 2))) : A (G (((p0 <= 2) OR ((2 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30) AND (p0 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20)) OR (3 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) OR ((p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= p0) AND (2 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30))))) : A (G ((p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30))) : A (G (TRUE)) : E (F ((2 <= p0))) : E (F (((1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p0 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20) AND ((p0 <= 2) OR (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 + 1 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30))))) : E (F (((p0 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (2 <= p0)))) : A (G (())) : E (F ((2 <= p0))) : E (F ((3 <= p0))) : A (G ((p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30))) : A (G (((p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30) OR ((p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p0 <= 2))))) : E (F (((p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20 + 1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p0 + 1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= 0))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (()))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 31 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= p0) AND ((1 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30) OR (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20)) AND (p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20 + 1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((p0 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20) OR (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= 0) OR (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= 2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p0 <= 2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((p0 <= 2) OR ((2 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30) AND (p0 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20)) OR (3 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) OR ((p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= p0) AND (2 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 16 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: lola: result: nostate equation: calling and running sara

lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (TRUE))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 31 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((2 <= p0)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-7.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
sara: try reading problem file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara.
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p0 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20) AND ((p0 <= 2) OR (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 + 1 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 8 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((p0 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (2 <= p0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (()))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 31 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((2 <= p0)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((3 <= p0)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
sara: lola: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30) OR ((p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p21 + p22 + p23 + p24 + p25 + p26 + p27 + p28 + p29 + p30 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p0 <= 2)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 3 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara

sara: try reading problem file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((p11 + p12 + p13 + p14 + p15 + p16 + p17 + p18 + p19 + p20 + 1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p0 + 1 <= p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10) AND (p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + p9 + p10 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes no yes yes yes no yes no yes no yes no no no yes no
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-0 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-1 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-3 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-4 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-5 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-8 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Finished stdout -----

BK_STOP 1496300470591

--------------------
content from stderr:

----- Start make prepare stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stderr -----

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Referendum-COL-0010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="lola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Referendum-COL-0010.tgz
mv Referendum-COL-0010 execution

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test

cd execution
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3254"
echo " Executing tool lola"
echo " Input is Referendum-COL-0010, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r208-smll-149581172200052"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;