About the Execution of LoLA for Referendum-PT-0010
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
106.820 | 237.00 | 60.00 | 0.00 | TFTFFFTFTTTFTFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3254
Executing tool lola
Input is Referendum-PT-0010, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r208-smll-149581172500124
=====================================================================
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-0
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-1
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-2
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-3
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-4
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-5
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-6
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-7
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-8
FORMULA_NAME Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-9
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1496320204723
Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
===========================================================================================
Referendum-PT-0010: translating PT Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating PT Petri net complete
checking for too many tokens
===========================================================================================
Referendum-PT-0010: translating PT formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
translating formula complete
touch formulae;
----- Start make result stdout -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ Referendum-PT-0010 @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stdout -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 52/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 31 places, 21 transitions, 21 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 13 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: A (G (())) : E (F (((1 <= ready) AND ((1 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9) OR (voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9 <= voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9)) AND (voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9 + 1 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10)))) : A (G (((ready <= voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9) OR (voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= 0) OR (voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9 <= 2)))) : A (G ((ready <= 2))) : A (G (((ready <= 2) OR ((2 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9) AND (ready <= voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9)) OR (3 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) OR ((voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= ready) AND (2 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9))))) : A (G ((voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9))) : A (G (TRUE)) : E (F ((2 <= ready))) : E (F (((1 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (ready <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9 <= voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9) AND ((ready <= 2) OR (voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 + 1 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9))))) : E (F (((ready <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (2 <= ready)))) : A (G (())) : E (F ((2 <= ready))) : E (F ((3 <= ready))) : A (G ((voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9))) : A (G (((voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9) OR ((voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (ready <= 2))))) : E (F (((voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9 + 1 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (ready + 1 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= 0))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (()))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 31 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= ready) AND ((1 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9) OR (voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9 <= voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9)) A... (shortened)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((ready <= voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9) OR (voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= 0) OR (voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 ... (shortened)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara.
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((ready <= 2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((ready <= 2) OR ((2 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9) AND (ready <= voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9)) OR (3 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + vot... (shortened)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 16 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (TRUE))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 31 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((2 <= ready)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (ready <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9... (shortened)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 8 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((ready <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (2 <= ready))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara
lola: ========================================
sara: try reading problem file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara.
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (()))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking initial satisfaction
lola: processed formula: TRUE
lola: processed formula length: 4
lola: 3 rewrites
lola: formula mentions 0 of 31 places; total mentions: 0
lola: closed formula file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: processed formula with 0 atomic propositions
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: preprocessing
lola: The net satisfies the property already in its initial state.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((2 <= ready)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((3 <= ready)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10 <= voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9) OR ((voting_10 + voting_1 + voting_2 + voting_3 + voting_4 + voting_5 + voting_6 + voting_7 + voting_8 + voting_9 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_... (shortened)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 3 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: state equation: solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((voted_yes_10 + voted_yes_1 + voted_yes_2 + voted_yes_3 + voted_yes_4 + voted_yes_5 + voted_yes_6 + voted_yes_7 + voted_yes_8 + voted_yes_9 + 1 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_no_8 + voted_no_9 + voted_no_10) AND (ready + 1 <= voted_no_1 + voted_no_2 + voted_no_3 + voted_no_4 + voted_no_5 + voted_no_6 + voted_no_7 + voted_n... (shortened)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes no yes yes yes no yes no yes no yes no no no yes no
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-0 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-1 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-3 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-4 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-5 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-8 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA Referendum-COL-010-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Finished stdout -----
BK_STOP 1496320204960
--------------------
content from stderr:
----- Start make prepare stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stderr -----
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Referendum-PT-0010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="lola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Referendum-PT-0010.tgz
mv Referendum-PT-0010 execution
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
cd execution
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3254"
echo " Executing tool lola"
echo " Input is Referendum-PT-0010, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r208-smll-149581172500124"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;