Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3253
Executing tool lola
Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r078-ebro-149441008500223
=====================================================================

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-0
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-1
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-15
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-2
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-3
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-4
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-5
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-6
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-7
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-8
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-9

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1494936656379


Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
checking for too many tokens
----- Start make result stdout -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ TCPcondis-PT-30 @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stdout -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 62/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 30 places, 32 transitions, 21 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 48 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: E (F (((xFINACK <= xSYNRCVD) AND ((3 <= TIMEWAIT) OR (1 <= CLOSING)) AND (FINWAIT2 <= xSYNSENT) AND (SYN <= SYNRCVD) AND (CLOSEWAIT <= xFINWAIT2) AND (1 <= FINACK)))) : E (F ((((xCLOSED <= FINWAIT2) AND (2 <= xFINACK) AND (LASTACK <= xCLOSED)) OR (xCLOSED + 1 <= LASTACK)))) : E (F (((2 <= xFIN) AND (2 <= TIMEWAIT)))) : E (F (((xCLOSED <= xSYNACK) AND (xLASTACK <= ESTAB) AND (SYNACK <= LISTEN) AND (3 <= xFINWAIT1) AND ((xTIMEWAIT <= SYN) OR (1 <= xESTAB) OR (xSYNACK + 1 <= xFINWAIT2))))) : A (G ((xLASTACK <= xCLOSEWAIT))) : E (F (((xCLOSED <= 2) AND (xSYNACK <= xLISTEN) AND (((3 <= TIMEWAIT) AND (SYNACK <= LISTEN)) OR (ESTAB + 1 <= xFIN))))) : A (G ((((xESTAB <= 2) OR (xTIMEWAIT <= 2)) AND ((xFIN <= 1) OR (xSYNACK <= 1))))) : E (F (((FINWAIT2 <= SYNACK) AND ((SYNSENT <= xESTAB) OR (2 <= TIMEWAIT)) AND (3 <= SYNACK)))) : A (G (((xFINWAIT2 <= xCLOSEWAIT) OR (3 <= SYNSENT) OR (xTIMEWAIT <= 1) OR (2 <= CLOSING)))) : E (F ((((CLOSED <= FINACK) OR (CLOSED <= xCLOSEWAIT)) AND ((3 <= xSYNSENT) OR (1 <= SYNSENT) OR ((1 <= SYNACK) AND (3 <= FINWAIT1)))))) : E (F (((1 <= xFINWAIT2) OR ((1 <= xFINACK) AND (3 <= LISTEN)) OR ((CLOSED <= TIMEWAIT) AND (xESTAB <= xSYNSENT) AND (3 <= FINACK))))) : A (G (((FINWAIT2 <= xSYNACK) OR (3 <= xTIMEWAIT) OR (2 <= xCLOSING) OR (xSYNRCVD <= 2)))) : E (F (((CLOSEWAIT <= xLISTEN) AND (FINACK <= xSYNSENT) AND (SYNSENT + 1 <= xFINWAIT1) AND (1 <= TIMEWAIT)))) : E (F (((xCLOSED <= 2) AND (SYN + 1 <= SYNSENT) AND (SYNACK <= 1)))) : E (F (((3 <= FIN) AND (FIN <= xSYNACK)))) : A (G (((1 <= xCLOSED) OR (3 <= xCLOSING) OR ((1 <= xSYNSENT)) OR (xCLOSEWAIT <= 2))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xFINACK <= xSYNRCVD) AND ((3 <= TIMEWAIT) OR (1 <= CLOSING)) AND (FINWAIT2 <= xSYNSENT) AND (SYN <= SYNRCVD) AND (CLOSEWAIT <= xFINWAIT2) AND (1 <= FINACK))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 12 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((xCLOSED <= FINWAIT2) AND (2 <= xFINACK) AND (LASTACK <= xCLOSED)) OR (xCLOSED + 1 <= LASTACK))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((2 <= xFIN) AND (2 <= TIMEWAIT))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: lola: ========================================
sara: try reading problem file TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality.sara.
subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xCLOSED <= xSYNACK) AND (xLASTACK <= ESTAB) AND (SYNACK <= LISTEN) AND (3 <= xFINWAIT1) AND ((xTIMEWAIT <= SYN) OR (1 <= xESTAB) OR (xSYNACK + 1 <= xFINWAIT2)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 15 literals and 3 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((xLASTACK <= xCLOSEWAIT)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xCLOSED <= 2) AND (xSYNACK <= xLISTEN) AND (((3 <= TIMEWAIT) AND (SYNACK <= LISTEN)) OR (ESTAB + 1 <= xFIN)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 7 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: ========================================
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((((xESTAB <= 2) OR (xTIMEWAIT <= 2)) AND ((xFIN <= 1) OR (xSYNACK <= 1)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((FINWAIT2 <= SYNACK) AND ((SYNSENT <= xESTAB) OR (2 <= TIMEWAIT)) AND (3 <= SYNACK))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((xFINWAIT2 <= xCLOSEWAIT) OR (3 <= SYNSENT) OR (xTIMEWAIT <= 1) OR (2 <= CLOSING))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: sara: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)try reading problem file TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara.

lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((((CLOSED <= FINACK) OR (CLOSED <= xCLOSEWAIT)) AND ((3 <= xSYNSENT) OR (1 <= SYNSENT) OR ((1 <= SYNACK) AND (3 <= FINWAIT1))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 14 literals and 6 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((1 <= xFINWAIT2) OR ((1 <= xFINACK) AND (3 <= LISTEN)) OR ((CLOSED <= TIMEWAIT) AND (xESTAB <= xSYNSENT) AND (3 <= FINACK)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: sara: SUBTASKplace or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola:
using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((FINWAIT2 <= xSYNACK) OR (3 <= xTIMEWAIT) OR (2 <= xCLOSING) OR (xSYNRCVD <= 2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara

lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((CLOSEWAIT <= xLISTEN) AND (FINACK <= xSYNSENT) AND (SYNSENT + 1 <= xFINWAIT1) AND (1 <= TIMEWAIT))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((xCLOSED <= 2) AND (SYN + 1 <= SYNSENT) AND (SYNACK <= 1))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-13.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= FIN) AND (FIN <= xSYNACK))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: state equation: solution produced
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((1 <= xCLOSED) OR (3 <= xCLOSING) OR ((1 <= xSYNSENT)) OR (xCLOSEWAIT <= 2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola:
SUMMARY: yes yes yes yes no yes no yes no yes yes no yes yes yes no
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-0 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-1 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-3 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-4 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-5 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-6 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-7 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-8 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-9 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Finished stdout -----

BK_STOP 1494936656670

--------------------
content from stderr:

----- Start make prepare stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stderr -----

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-30"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="lola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-30.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-30 execution

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test

cd execution
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3253"
echo " Executing tool lola"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r078-ebro-149441008500223"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;