About the Execution of LoLA for BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V04P05N02
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
112.350 | 247.00 | 40.00 | 0.00 | FTFTFFTFTTTFTFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-3254
Executing tool lola
Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V04P05N02, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r008-csrt-149436126300439
=====================================================================
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-0
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-1
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-15
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-2
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-3
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-4
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-5
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-6
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-7
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-8
FORMULA_NAME BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-9
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1494613109694
Time: 3600 - MCC
----- Start make prepare stdout -----
checking for too many tokens
----- Start make result stdout -----
ReachabilityCardinality @ BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V04P05N02 @ 3540 seconds
----- Start make result stdout -----
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 80/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 28 places, 52 transitions, 21 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 85 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: E (F ((2 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2))) : A (G (((CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2 <= NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4) OR (2 <= SORTI_A)))) : A (G ((SUR_PONT_B <= 2))) : A (G (((SUR_PONT_A <= 2) OR (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= 2) OR (ATTENTE_A + 1 <= CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2)))) : A (G (((CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2 <= ATTENTE_A) OR (ATTENTE_A <= ATTENTE_B) OR () OR ((SORTI_A <= SUR_PONT_A) AND ((1 <= SORTI_B) OR (SUR_PONT_B <= SORTI_A)))))) : E (F (((CAPACITE <= 2) AND ((CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2 <= ROUTE_B) OR (SORTI_B <= CAPACITE)) AND ((CAPACITE + 1 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2) OR (ROUTE_B <= 1))))) : A (G (((SUR_PONT_A <= 2) OR (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= 0) OR ((SORTI_A <= 0) AND (ROUTE_B + 1 <= SUR_PONT_A))))) : E (F (((SUR_PONT_A + 1 <= NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4) AND (NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= 0) AND (ATTENTE_A <= ROUTE_B) AND (SUR_PONT_A + 1 <= ATTENTE_A)))) : E (F ((CAPACITE <= SORTI_A))) : E (F (((3 <= SORTI_A) AND (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= ROUTE_A) AND ((3 <= VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2) OR (COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2)) AND (NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= SUR_PONT_B) AND (2 <= ROUTE_A) AND (3 <= ATTENTE_B)))) : E (F (((3 <= CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2) AND ((NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= SORTI_A) OR (3 <= NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4)) AND (3 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2)))) : A (G (((1 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2) OR (3 <= ATTENTE_A) OR (CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2 <= VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2) OR (COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2 <= ATTENTE_A)))) : E (F (((SORTI_A <= SUR_PONT_A) AND ((CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2 <= SORTI_B) OR (NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= SORTI_A)) AND (NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4 <= CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2) AND (SORTI_B <= SUR_PONT_B) AND (SUR_PONT_A + 1 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2)))) : E (F (((ATTENTE_B <= CAPACITE) AND (SORTI_A <= SORTI_B) AND (3 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2) AND (2 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2) AND (NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2)))) : A (G ((2 <= CAPACITE))) : E (F (((CAPACITE <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2) AND (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= ROUTE_B) AND ((2 <= NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4) OR (1 <= SUR_PONT_B)) AND (CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2 <= 2) AND (ROUTE_B <= 2))))
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((2 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2 <= NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4) OR (2 <= SORTI_A))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 2 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((SUR_PONT_B <= 2)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((SUR_PONT_A <= 2) OR (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= 2) OR (ATTENTE_A + 1 <= CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 3 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2 <= ATTENTE_A) OR (ATTENTE_A <= ATTENTE_B) OR () OR ((SORTI_A <= SUR_PONT_A) AND ((1 <= SORTI_B) OR (SUR_PONT_B <= SORTI_A))))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: State predicate is contradiction.
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state equation
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((CAPACITE <= 2) AND ((CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2 <= ROUTE_B) OR (SORTI_B <= CAPACITE)) AND ((CAPACITE + 1 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2) OR (ROUTE_B <= 1)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 12 literals and 4 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((SUR_PONT_A <= 2) OR (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= 0) OR ((SORTI_A <= 0) AND (ROUTE_B + 1 <= SUR_PONT_A)))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((SUR_PONT_A + 1 <= NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4) AND (NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= 0) AND (ATTENTE_A <= ROUTE_B) AND (SUR_PONT_A + 1 <= ATTENTE_A))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F ((CAPACITE <= SORTI_A)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-8.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= SORTI_A) AND (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= ROUTE_A) AND ((3 <= VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2) OR (COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2)) AND (NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= SUR_PONT_B) AND (2 <= ROUTE_A) AND (3 <= ATTENTE_B))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 12 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-9.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((3 <= CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2) AND ((NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= SORTI_A) OR (3 <= NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4)) AND (3 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 6 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-10.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G (((1 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2) OR (3 <= ATTENTE_A) OR (CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2 <= VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2) OR (COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2 <= ATTENTE_A))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 4 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((SORTI_A <= SUR_PONT_A) AND ((CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2 <= SORTI_B) OR (NB_ATTENTE_A_0 + NB_ATTENTE_A_1 + NB_ATTENTE_A_2 + NB_ATTENTE_A_3 + NB_ATTENTE_A_4 <= SORTI_A)) AND (NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4 <= CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2) AND (SORTI_B <= SUR_PONT_B) AND (SUR_PONT_A + 1 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 10 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((ATTENTE_B <= CAPACITE) AND (SORTI_A <= SORTI_B) AND (3 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2) AND (2 <= COMPTEUR_0 + COMPTEUR_1 + COMPTEUR_2) AND (NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4 <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 5 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: A (G ((2 <= CAPACITE)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 1 literals and 1 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: state equation: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=-1)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: E (F (((CAPACITE <= CHOIX_1 + CHOIX_2) AND (VIDANGE_1 + VIDANGE_2 <= ROUTE_B) AND ((2 <= NB_ATTENTE_B_0 + NB_ATTENTE_B_1 + NB_ATTENTE_B_2 + NB_ATTENTE_B_3 + NB_ATTENTE_B_4) OR (1 <= SUR_PONT_B)) AND (CONTROLEUR_1 + CONTROLEUR_2 <= 2) AND (ROUTE_B <= 2))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 84 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH (state space)
lola: state space: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: state space: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: state equation: Generated DNF with 10 literals and 2 conjunctive subformulas
lola: state equation: write sara problem file to BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-15.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: produced by: state space
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: RESULT
lola: lola: ========================================
SUMMARY: no yes yes yes yes no yes no yes no no yes no no yes no
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-0 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-1 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-3 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-4 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-5 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-8 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
FORMULA BridgeAndVehicles-COL-V04P05N02-ReachabilityCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES COLLATERAL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
----- Kill lola and sara stdout -----
----- Finished stdout -----
BK_STOP 1494613109941
--------------------
content from stderr:
----- Start make prepare stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Start make result stderr -----
----- Kill lola and sara stderr -----
----- Finished stderr -----
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V04P05N02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="lola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V04P05N02.tgz
mv BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V04P05N02 execution
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
cd execution
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-3254"
echo " Executing tool lola"
echo " Input is BridgeAndVehicles-PT-V04P05N02, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r008-csrt-149436126300439"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;