fond
Model Checking Contest @ Petri Nets 2016
6th edition, Toruń, Poland, June 21, 2016
Execution of r158kn-blw3-146416414400097
Last Updated
June 30, 2016

About the Execution of LoLa for S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
117.920 308.00 10.00 0.00 FFTFFTFTTFFTTFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-2979
Executing tool lola
Input is S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17, examination is ReachabilityCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r158kn-blw3-146416414400097
=====================================================================


--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-0
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-1
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-15
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-2
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-3
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-4
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-5
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-6
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-7
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-8
FORMULA_NAME IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-9

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1464204172336

bkconf 3600
===========================================================================================
===========================================================================================
S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17: translating Petri net model.pnml into LoLA format
S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17: translating formula ReachabilityCardinality into LoLA format
===========================================================================================
/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/pnml2lola.py model.pnml > model.pnml.lola
===========================================================================================
/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/formula2lola.py ReachabilityCardinality.xml
touch formulae;


in benchkit_head lolaszeit 3540
ReachabilityCardinality @ S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-0 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-1 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-3 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-4 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-5 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-8 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
FORMULA IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARALLEL_PROCESSING EXPLICIT SAT_SMT STATE_COMPRESSION STUBBORN_SETS TOPOLOGICAL
lola: LoLA will run for 3540 seconds at most (--timelimit)
lola: NET
lola: reading net from model.pnml.lola
lola: finished parsing
lola: closed net file model.pnml.lola
lola: 156/65536 symbol table entries, 0 collisions
lola: preprocessing...
lola: finding significant places
lola: 111 places, 45 transitions, 44 significant places
lola: computing forward-conflicting sets
lola: computing back-conflicting sets
lola: 70 transition conflict sets
lola: TASK
lola: reading formula from IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality.task
lola: read: AG (((!(3 <= Status_p21_5) AND (3 <= MerchantOffer_p2 OR 1 <= p12_0)) OR !((2 <= p11_8 OR Delivery_p22_1 <= PaidFor_p11_1)))) : AG (MerchantDelivery_p4_6 <= Status_p21_14) : EF ((!((2 <= p3_4 OR p6_3 <= Status_p22_7)) AND (!(p7_3 <= p4_4) AND !(1 <= Organization_p22_2)))) : AG (p11_8 <= p12_0) : AG (DeliveryNote_p22_14 <= p4_4) : EF (!(2 <= PaymentHandlerPayment_p5_0)) : AG (!(((p6_6 <= p3_3 OR 1 ... (shortened)
lola: formula length: 1161
lola: computing a collection of formulas
lola: RUNNING
lola: subprocess 0 will run for 221 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (((-Status_p21_5 > -3 AND (-MerchantOffer_p2 <= -3 OR -p12_0 <= -1)) OR (-p11_8 > -2 AND Delivery_p22_1 + -PaidFor_p11_1 > 0)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 10 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 1 will run for 236 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (-Status_p21_14 + MerchantDelivery_p4_6 <= 0)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 1 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 2 will run for 252 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: EF ((-p3_4 > -2 AND (p6_3 + -Status_p22_7 > 0 AND (-p4_4 + p7_3 > 0 AND -Organization_p22_2 > -1))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 4 literals
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: calling and running sara
lola: subprocess 3 will run for 272 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (-p12_0 + p11_8 <= 0)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 1 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-3.sara
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 4 will run for 295 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (DeliveryNote_p22_14 + -p4_4 <= 0)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 1 literals
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-4.sara
lola: calling and running sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 5 will run for 321 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: EF (-PaymentHandlerPayment_p5_0 > -2)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 1 literals
sara: try reading problem file IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-2.sara.
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-5.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 6 will run for 354 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (((p6_6 + -p3_3 > 0 AND -p4_2 > -1) OR (-Status_p21_5 > -1 OR -OfferResponce_p10 > -3)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 6 literals
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara
lola: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-6.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic


lola: sara:solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The predicate is invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 7 will run for 393 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (((Delivery_p22_8 + -p11_4 > 0 AND -PaymentAmount_p11_6 > -3) OR (p5_2 + -DeliveryRequest_p12_5 > 0 OR -PaymentResponse_p11_12 > -1)))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 6 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 8 will run for 442 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: EF (((-p10_2 <= -1 AND Status_p22_11 + -p2_2 > 0) OR (p4_1 + -WhatDeliver_p12_1 <= 0 AND (Organization_p21_2 + -p3_8 <= 0 AND -p7_2 + DeliveryRequest_p12_5 > 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 5 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 9 will run for 505 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (-PayReceipt_p21_12 > -2)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 1 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 10 will run for 590 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: EF (p11_8 + -Status_p22_13 <= 0)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 1 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 11 will run for 708 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG ((-p7_1 + p1_1 <= 0 OR Organization_p22_9 + -p4_5 <= 0))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 2 literals
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-11.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 12 will run for 885 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: AG (-p12_7 + WhatDeliver_p12_1 <= 0)
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking invariance
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 1 literals
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-12.sara
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is not invariant.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 13 will run for 1180 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: EF (((-HowDeliver_p12_2 > -3 OR -p11_8 > -2) AND -Status_p21_14 <= -1))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 4 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 14 will run for 1770 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: EF (((-p5_2 > -3 OR -Delivery_p22_8 + p3_8 <= 0) AND -PaidFor_p11_1 <= -2))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 4 literals
lola: write sara problem file to IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara
lola: calling and running sara
sara: try reading problem file IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17-ReachabilityCardinality-14.sara.
sara: place or transition ordering is non-deterministic

lola: sara:solution impossible
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: no
lola: The predicate is unreachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: subprocess 15 will run for 3540 seconds at most (--localtimelimit=0)
lola: ========================================
lola: ...considering subproblem: EF ((-p3_2 <= -3 AND (-Organization_p22_5 <= -2 OR (-PaymentRequest_p11_9 <= -2 AND Order_p22_10 + -p6_2 <= 0))))
lola: ========================================
lola: SUBTASK
lola: checking reachability
lola: Planning: workflow for reachability check: stateequation||search (--findpath=off)
lola: STORE
lola: using a bit-perfect encoder (--encoder=bit)
lola: using 176 bytes per marking, with 0 unused bits
lola: using a prefix tree store (--store=prefix)
lola: SEARCH
lola: using reachability graph (--search=depth)
lola: using reachability preserving stubborn set method with insertion algorithm (--stubborn=tarjan)
lola: RUNNING
lola: Transformation into DNF: expect 5 literals
lola: SUBRESULT
lola: result: yes
lola: The predicate is reachable.
lola: ========================================
lola: RESULT
lola: summary: no no yes no no yes yes no yes no yes no no yes no yes

BK_STOP 1464204172644

--------------------
content from stderr:

parsing of model.pnml complete

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="lola"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/home/hulinhub/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17.tgz
mv S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17 execution

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test

cd execution
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-2979"
echo " Executing tool lola"
echo " Input is S_IOTPpurchase-PT-C12M10P15D17, examination is ReachabilityCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r158kn-blw3-146416414400097"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property ReachabilityCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "ReachabilityCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;