fond
Model Checking Contest @ Petri Nets 2016
6th edition, Toruń, Poland, June 21, 2016
Execution of r001kn-ebro-146347648900438
Last Updated
June 30, 2016

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for CSRepetitions-COL-02

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
494.430 31525.00 40980.00 221.10 FFFTFFFTTFFFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-2979
Executing tool itstools
Input is CSRepetitions-COL-02, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r001kn-ebro-146347648900438
=====================================================================


--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-0
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-1
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-15
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-2
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-3
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-4
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-5
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-6
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-7
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-8
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-9

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1464023908752


its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/eclipse/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.201605191313/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.gal -t CGAL -LTL /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.ltl -c -stutter-deadlock
Read 16 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((((("Client0.clientSending_0>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1"))||(("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))||(("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))||(("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1"))))
Formula 0 simplified : !(("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1"))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
30 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.340413,29512,1,0,14135,130,349,19706,77,775,26382
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-0 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 1 : !((X(G(F((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))))))
Formula 1 simplified : !XGF(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
16 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.5184,35860,1,0,25088,130,405,28725,78,813,47771
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 1 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-1 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 2 : !((((("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1")||("Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1"))||("Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1"))||("Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1")))
Formula 2 simplified : !("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1" | "Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1" | "Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1" | "Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1")
1 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
0 transitions explored
1 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.519842,36108,1,0,25088,130,426,28725,78,813,47778
no accepting run found
Formula 2 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 3 : !((G((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))))
Formula 3 simplified : !G(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.523936,36344,1,0,25088,130,463,28725,78,813,47915
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 3 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-3 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 4 : !((G(G(X(F((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))))))))
Formula 4 simplified : !GXF(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
1 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.530324,36556,1,0,25172,130,463,28942,78,817,48131
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 4 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-4 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 5 : !(((G(F(G(((("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1")||("Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1"))||("Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1"))||("Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1")))))U(G(F(((("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1")||("Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1"))||("Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1"))||("Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1"))))))
Formula 5 simplified : !(GFG("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1" | "Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1" | "Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1" | "Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1") U GF("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1" | "Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1" | "Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1" | "Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1"))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
6 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.594463,37736,1,0,29037,130,472,31657,78,828,55193
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 5 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-5 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 6 : !((G((((("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1")||("Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1"))||("Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1"))||("Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1"))U((((("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1")||("Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1"))||("Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1"))||("Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1"))U((((((((("Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1"))||(("Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")))||(("Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1")))||(("Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")))))))
Formula 6 simplified : !G(("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1" | "Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1" | "Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1" | "Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1") U (("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1" | "Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1" | "Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1" | "Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1") U (("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1") | ("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1"))))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
68 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,9.16865,59860,1,0,85118,130,943,82327,78,1137,153266
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 6 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-6 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 7 : !(((F(F(G(((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")||("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1"))||("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1"))||("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")))))U(X((((("Client0.clientSending_0>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1"))||(("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))||(("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))||(("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1"))))))
Formula 7 simplified : !(FG("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" | "Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" | "Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" | "Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1") U X(("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))
3 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
2 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,9.20088,60120,1,0,85118,130,943,82327,78,1137,153313
no accepting run found
Formula 7 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-7 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 8 : !((G(X((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))))))
Formula 8 simplified : !GX(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
1 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,9.20904,60144,1,0,85422,130,943,82558,78,1137,154131
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 8 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-8 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 9 : !((G((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))))
Formula 9 simplified : !G(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
1 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,9.21214,60144,1,0,85422,130,943,82558,78,1137,154131
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 9 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 10 : !((G((((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))U((((((((("Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1"))||(("Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")))||(("Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1")))||(("Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1"))))U(F(X((((((((("Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1"))||(("Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")))||(("Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1")))||(("Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1"))))))))
Formula 10 simplified : !G(((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")) U (("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1") | ("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1"))) U FX(("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1") | ("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1")))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
25 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,19.3654,73392,1,0,107938,130,949,95558,78,1143,191951
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 10 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 11 : !((F(X(X(X(((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")||("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1"))||("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1"))||("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")))))))
Formula 11 simplified : !FXXX("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" | "Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" | "Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" | "Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")
4 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
2 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,19.3842,73392,1,0,110150,130,967,96687,78,1143,196188
no accepting run found
Formula 11 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 12 : !((G(X(((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))U((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))))))
Formula 12 simplified : !GX(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1"))
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,19.3888,73392,1,0,110150,130,967,96687,78,1143,196188
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 12 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 13 : !((((((("Client0.clientSending_0>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1"))||(("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))||(("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))||(("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")&&("requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")))U((((((((("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1"))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1")))||(("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))||(("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1")&&("Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))))
Formula 13 simplified : !((("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "requestBufferSlots.requestBufferSlots[0]>=1")) U (("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server0.serverWaiting_0>=1") | ("Client0.requestBuffer_0>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client1.requestBuffer_1>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client2.requestBuffer_2>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1") | ("Client3.requestBuffer_3>=1" & "Server1.serverWaiting_1>=1")))
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,19.4083,73392,1,0,110150,130,1008,96687,78,1143,196214
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 13 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 14 : !((F(F(X(G(G(((("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1")||("Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1"))||("Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1"))||("Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1"))))))))
Formula 14 simplified : !FXG("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1" | "Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1" | "Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1" | "Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1")
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
3 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
37 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,19.7804,77744,1,0,131770,130,1029,123421,78,1239,235121
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 14 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 15 : !(((X(X(X((((((((("Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1"))||(("Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1")))||(("Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1")&&("Client0.clientSending_0>=1")))||(("Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1")&&("Client1.clientSending_1>=1")))||(("Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1")&&("Client2.clientSending_2>=1")))||(("Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1")&&("Client3.clientSending_3>=1"))))))U(((("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1")||("Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1"))||("Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1"))||("Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1"))))
Formula 15 simplified : !(XXX(("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation0.serverAnwering_0>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation2.serverAnwering_2>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation4.serverAnwering_4>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation6.serverAnwering_6>=1") | ("Client0.clientSending_0>=1" & "Computation1.serverAnwering_1>=1") | ("Client1.clientSending_1>=1" & "Computation3.serverAnwering_3>=1") | ("Client2.clientSending_2>=1" & "Computation5.serverAnwering_5>=1") | ("Client3.clientSending_3>=1" & "Computation7.serverAnwering_7>=1")) U ("Client0.clientWaiting_0>=1" | "Client1.clientWaiting_1>=1" | "Client2.clientWaiting_2>=1" | "Client3.clientWaiting_3>=1"))
1 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
0 transitions explored
1 items max in DFS search stack
0 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,22.2984,118400,1,0,131770,130,1029,123421,78,1239,235121
no accepting run found
Formula 15 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA CSRepetitions-COL-02-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1464023940277

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ java -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.6 -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -Xss8m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m -Declipse.pde.launch=true -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -classpath /home/mcc/BenchKit//eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.3.100.v20150511-1540.jar org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main -application fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc -data /home/mcc/BenchKit//workspace -os linux -ws gtk -arch x86_64 -nl en_US -consoleLog -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit//yices/bin/yices -its
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=512m; support was removed in 8.0
May 23, 2016 5:18:32 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application transformPNML
INFO: Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
May 23, 2016 5:18:32 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PnmlToGalTransformer transform
INFO: Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
May 23, 2016 5:18:36 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PnmlToGalTransformer transform
INFO: Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 4096 ms
May 23, 2016 5:18:36 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: Transformed 6 places.
May 23, 2016 5:18:36 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: read order :VarOrder [vars=[requestBufferSlots[0], clientSending[0], clientSending[1], clientSending[2], clientSending[3], requestBuffer[0], requestBuffer[1], requestBuffer[2], requestBuffer[3], serverWaiting[0], serverWaiting[1], clientWaiting[0], clientWaiting[1], clientWaiting[2], clientWaiting[3], serverAnwering[0], serverAnwering[1], serverAnwering[2], serverAnwering[3], serverAnwering[4], serverAnwering[5], serverAnwering[6], serverAnwering[7]]]
May 23, 2016 5:18:36 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: sort/places :Server->serverWaiting,
Computation->serverAnwering,
Dot->requestBufferSlots,
Client->clientSending,requestBuffer,clientWaiting,

May 23, 2016 5:18:36 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.HLGALTransformer handlePage
INFO: Transformed 5 transitions.
May 23, 2016 5:18:36 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.pnml.togal.PnmlToGalTransformer transform
INFO: Computed order based on color domains : CompositeGalOrder [children=[VarOrder [vars=[serverWaiting[0]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverWaiting[1]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[0]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[1]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[2]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[3]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[4]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[5]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[6]]], VarOrder [vars=[serverAnwering[7]]], VarOrder [vars=[requestBufferSlots[0]]], VarOrder [vars=[clientSending[0], requestBuffer[0], clientWaiting[0]]], VarOrder [vars=[clientSending[1], requestBuffer[1], clientWaiting[1]]], VarOrder [vars=[clientSending[2], requestBuffer[2], clientWaiting[2]]], VarOrder [vars=[clientSending[3], requestBuffer[3], clientWaiting[3]]]]]
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.GALRewriter flatten
INFO: Flatten gal took : 38 ms
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application applyOrder
INFO: Applying decomposition
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder decomposeWithOrder
INFO: Decomposing Gal with order
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.GALRewriter flatten
INFO: Flatten gal took : 14 ms
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder decomposeWithOrder
INFO: Partition obtained :[serverWaiting[0], ],[serverWaiting[1], ],[serverAnwering[0], ],[serverAnwering[1], ],[serverAnwering[2], ],[serverAnwering[3], ],[serverAnwering[4], ],[serverAnwering[5], ],[serverAnwering[6], ],[serverAnwering[7], ],[requestBufferSlots[0], ],[clientSending[0], requestBuffer[0], clientWaiting[0], ],[clientSending[1], requestBuffer[1], clientWaiting[1], ],[clientSending[2], requestBuffer[2], clientWaiting[2], ],[clientSending[3], requestBuffer[3], clientWaiting[3], ],

May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder rewriteArraysToAllowPartition
INFO: Rewriting array clientSending to variables to allow decomposition.
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder rewriteArraysToAllowPartition
INFO: Rewriting array requestBuffer to variables to allow decomposition.
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder rewriteArraysToAllowPartition
INFO: Rewriting array serverWaiting to variables to allow decomposition.
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder rewriteArraysToAllowPartition
INFO: Rewriting array clientWaiting to variables to allow decomposition.
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.CompositeBuilder rewriteArraysToAllowPartition
INFO: Rewriting array serverAnwering to variables to allow decomposition.
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.gal.instantiate.Instantiator fuseIsomorphicEffects
INFO: Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil systemToFile
INFO: Time to serialize gal into /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.gal : 16 ms
May 23, 2016 5:18:37 PM fr.lip6.move.serialization.SerializationUtil serializePropertiesForITSLTLTools
INFO: Time to serialize properties into /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.ltl : 6 ms

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CSRepetitions-COL-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/users/gast00/fkordon/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CSRepetitions-COL-02.tgz
mv CSRepetitions-COL-02 execution

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test

cd execution
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-2979"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is CSRepetitions-COL-02, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r001kn-ebro-146347648900438"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;