About the Execution of Marcie for SimpleLoadBal-COL-02
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
5437.160 | 33749.00 | 33059.00 | 20.20 | TFTTTTFFTFFFTFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-2979
Executing tool marcie
Input is SimpleLoadBal-COL-02, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 1
Run identifier is r125kn-qhx2-146373370900003
=====================================================================
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-0
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-1
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-15
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-3
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-4
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-5
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-6
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-7
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-8
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-9
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1464427398310
Marcie rev. 8535M (built: crohr on 2016-04-27)
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets
authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)
Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)
Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)
marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de
called as: marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mcc-file=CTLCardinality.xml --mcc-mode --memory=6 --suppress
parse successfull
net created successfully
Unfolding complete |P|=32|T|=51|A|=284
Time for unfolding: 0m 4.174sec
Net: SimpleLoadBal_COL_02
(NrP: 32 NrTr: 51 NrArc: 284)
net check time: 0m 0.000sec
parse formulas
formulas created successfully
place and transition orderings generation:0m 0.000sec
init dd package: 0m19.473sec
RS generation: 0m 0.073sec
-> reachability set: #nodes 977 (9.8e+02) #states 832
starting MCC model checker
--------------------------
checking: 2<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)
normalized: 2<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)
abstracting: (2<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)) states: 32
-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-0 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.235sec
checking: ~ [~ [AX [~ [1<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)]]]]
normalized: ~ [EX [1<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)]]
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)) states: 304
.-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-1 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.236sec
checking: AG [EX [~ [3<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [~ [3<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]]]]
abstracting: (3<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)) states: 0
.-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-2 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.208sec
checking: EG [~ [EF [2<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]]
normalized: EG [~ [E [true U 2<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]]
abstracting: (2<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)) states: 32
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.309sec
checking: [1<=sum(P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_1) & AF [~ [~ [1<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1]]]]
normalized: [1<=sum(P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_1) & ~ [EG [~ [1<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1]]]]
abstracting: (1<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1) states: 324
..........10:612........
EG iterations: 18
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_1)) states: 365
-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-3 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.309sec
checking: P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1)
normalized: P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1)
abstracting: (P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1)) states: 632
-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.203sec
checking: ~ [AF [sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]]
normalized: EG [~ [sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]]
abstracting: (sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)) states: 648
......
EG iterations: 6
-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-4 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.228sec
checking: AG [EX [sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [EX [sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]]]
abstracting: (sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)) states: 368
.-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-9 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.221sec
checking: [EX [~ [3<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]] | AG [EX [P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)]]]
normalized: [~ [E [true U ~ [EX [P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)]]]] | EX [~ [3<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]]]
abstracting: (3<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)) states: 0
.abstracting: (P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)) states: 468
.-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-8 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.346sec
checking: [~ [~ [AX [sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)]]] | EF [EG [2<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1]]]
normalized: [E [true U EG [2<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1]] | ~ [EX [~ [sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)]]]]
abstracting: (sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)) states: 590
.abstracting: (2<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1) states: 0
.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.148sec
checking: sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)
normalized: sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)
abstracting: (sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)) states: 832
-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-6 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.150sec
checking: [2<=sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1) | [~ [sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1] & sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]]
normalized: [2<=sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1) | [sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1) & ~ [sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1]]]
abstracting: (sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1) states: 656
abstracting: (sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)) states: 564
abstracting: (2<=sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)) states: 54
-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.515sec
checking: [~ [~ [EF [2<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)]]] | ~ [EF [[1<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1) & 1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)]]]]
normalized: [~ [E [true U [1<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1) & 1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)]]] | E [true U 2<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)]]
abstracting: (2<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)) states: 832
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)) states: 624
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)) states: 304
-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.447sec
checking: AG [~ [~ [[3<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0) & sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)<=sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)]]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[3<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0) & sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)<=sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)]]]]
abstracting: (sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)<=sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)) states: 0
abstracting: (3<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)) states: 0
-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-5 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 0.239sec
checking: [~ [[[~ [sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1] | [sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_1) & sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)<=sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)]] | EF [sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]] & A [[2<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1) | 1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)] U ~ [sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]]]
normalized: [[~ [EG [sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]] & ~ [E [sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1) U [sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1) & ~ [[2<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1) | 1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)]]]]]] & ~ [[[[sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_1) & sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)<=sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)] | ~ [sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1]] | E [true U sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)]]]]
abstracting: (sum(P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_2, P_lb_routing_C_lb_id_1_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_client_ack_C_client_id_2, P_client_ack_C_client_id_1)) states: 720
abstracting: (sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)<=P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1) states: 592
abstracting: (sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)<=sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)) states: 32
abstracting: (sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_ack_C_server_id_1)) states: 648
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)) states: 624
abstracting: (2<=sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)) states: 32
abstracting: (sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)) states: 832
abstracting: (sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)) states: 832
abstracting: (sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)) states: 832
EG iterations: 0
-> the formula is FALSE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-7 FALSE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 1.089sec
checking: [AX [[[sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0) | P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)] | 1<=sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)]] & [[[1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1) & ~ [sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)]] | EF [1<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)]] | ~ [[[sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0) & 1<=P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1] | [2<=sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1) & 3<=sum(P_client_waiting_C_client_id_2, P_client_waiting_C_client_id_1)]]]]]
normalized: [[[[1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1) & ~ [sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)]] | E [true U 1<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)]] | ~ [[[sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0) & 1<=P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1] | [2<=sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1) & 3<=sum(P_client_waiting_C_client_id_2, P_client_waiting_C_client_id_1)]]]] & ~ [EX [~ [[1<=sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1) | [sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0) | P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)]]]]]]
abstracting: (P_lb_idle_C_lb_id_1<=sum(P_server_notification_C_server_id_2, P_server_notification_C_server_id_1)) states: 647
abstracting: (sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)) states: 832
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_server_processed_C_server_id_2, P_server_processed_C_server_id_1)) states: 356
.abstracting: (3<=sum(P_client_waiting_C_client_id_2, P_client_waiting_C_client_id_1)) states: 0
abstracting: (2<=sum(P_server_idle_C_server_id_2, P_server_idle_C_server_id_1)) states: 57
abstracting: (1<=P_lb_balancing_C_lb_id_1) states: 364
abstracting: (sum(P_client_request_C_client_id_2, P_client_request_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)) states: 832
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_2_C_clients_no_0, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_2, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_1, P_lb_load_C_server_id_1_C_clients_no_0)) states: 832
abstracting: (sum(P_client_idle_C_client_id_2, P_client_idle_C_client_id_1)<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)) states: 740
abstracting: (1<=sum(P_server_waiting_C_server_id_2, P_server_waiting_C_server_id_1)) states: 624
-> the formula is TRUE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-COL-02-CTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES SEQUENTIAL_PROCESSING DECISION_DIAGRAMS UNFOLDING_TO_PT
MC time: 0m 1.104sec
Total processing time: 0m33.686sec
BK_STOP 1464427432059
--------------------
content from stderr:
check for maximal unmarked siphon
ok
check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok
.........10 977.................................
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SimpleLoadBal-COL-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="marcie"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/home/fko/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SimpleLoadBal-COL-02.tgz
mv SimpleLoadBal-COL-02 execution
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
cd execution
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-2979"
echo " Executing tool marcie"
echo " Input is SimpleLoadBal-COL-02, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 1"
echo " Run identifier is r125kn-qhx2-146373370900003"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;