fond
Model Checking Contest @ Petri Nets 2013
Milano, Italy, June 25, 2013
marcie: CTLFireability on Kanban/0050 (P/T)
Last Updated
Apr. 26, 2013

Introduction

This page shows the outputs produced by the execution of marcie on Kanban/0050 (P/T). We provide:

About the Execution

Execution Summary
Memory (MB) CPU (s) End
1006.23 8.46 normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

export BK_INPUT=Kanban-PT-0050
export BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
export BK_TOOL=marcie
export BK_RESULT_DIR=/tmp
export BK_LOG_FILE=/tmp/BenchKit_head_log_file.1665
export BIN_DIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin
cd /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Kanban-PT-0050
echo =====================================================================
echo ' Generated by BenchKit 1.0'
echo ' Executing tool marcie:'
echo ' Test is Kanban-PT-0050, examination is CTLFireability'
echo =====================================================================
echo
echo --------------------
echo 'content from stdout:'
echo
bash /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh

Execution Outputs of marcie for Kanban/0050 (P/T)

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.


execution on node 35: cluster1u37.lip6.fr (runId=136950569100876_n_35)
=====================================================================
runnning marcie on Kanban-PT-0050 (CTLFireability)
We got on stdout:
Probing ssh
Waiting ssh to respond
Ssh up and responding
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 1.0
Executing tool marcie:
Test is Kanban-PT-0050, examination is CTLFireability
=====================================================================

--------------------
content from stdout:

START 1369521607

Marcie rev. 1103M (build: rohrch on 2013-02-17)
A model checker for Generalized Stochastic Petri nets

authors: Alex Tovchigrechko (IDD package and CTL model checking)

Martin Schwarick (Symbolic numerical analysis and CSL model checking)

Christian Rohr (Simulative and approximative numerical model checking)

marcie@informatik.tu-cottbus.de

called as: marcie --net-file=model.pnml --mem=4 --mcc-file=CTLFireability.txt

constant oo registered with value < INFINITY >
parse successfull!


(NrP: 16 NrTr: 16)

net check time: 0m0sec

parse mcc successfull!

place and transition orderings generation:0m0sec

init dd package: 0m1sec


RS generation: 0m4sec


-> reachability set: #nodes 13466 (1.3e+04) #states 10,425,941,194,901,336 (16)



starting CTL model checker
--------------------------

checking: AF [[Pback3 \in [1, oo) & Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo)]]
normalized: ~ [EG [~ [[Pback3 \in [1, oo) & Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo)]]]]

.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA p_1441_fireability_and FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m0sec

checking: AG [[Pback3 \in [1, oo) | Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo)]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[Pback3 \in [1, oo) | Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo)]]]]

-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA p_1442_fireability_or FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m5sec

checking: AG [[Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo) & Pback3 \in [1, oo)]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo) & Pback3 \in [1, oo)]]]]

-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA p_1443_fireability_and_notx FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m2sec

checking: EG [[Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo) | Pback3 \in [1, oo)]]
normalized: EG [[Pback3 \in [1, oo) | Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo)]]

.
EG iterations: 1
-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA p_1444_fireability_or_notx FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m1sec

checking: AG [AG [[AG [P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo) && Pout4 \in [1, oo)] & Pback3 \in [1, oo)]]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U E [true U ~ [[Pback3 \in [1, oo) & ~ [E [true U ! (Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo))]]]]]]]

-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA p_1445_fireability_x FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m0sec

checking: EF [[P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo) && Pout4 \in [1, oo) & Pout3 \in [1, oo) && Pout2 \in [1, oo) && P1 \in [1, oo)]]
normalized: E [true U [P1 \in [1, oo) && Pout3 \in [1, oo) && Pout2 \in [1, oo) & Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo)]]

-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA p_1476_fireability_and TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m0sec

checking: AG [[P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo) && Pout4 \in [1, oo) | Pout3 \in [1, oo) && Pout2 \in [1, oo) && P1 \in [1, oo)]]
normalized: ~ [E [true U ~ [[P1 \in [1, oo) && Pout3 \in [1, oo) && Pout2 \in [1, oo) | Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo)]]]]

-> the formula is FALSE

FORMULA p_1477_fireability_or FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m4sec

checking: EG [[~ [P2 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo) && Pout4 \in [1, oo)] & ~ [Pout3 \in [1, oo) && Pout2 \in [1, oo) && P1 \in [1, oo)]]]
normalized: EG [[! (P1 \in [1, oo) && Pout3 \in [1, oo) && Pout2 \in [1, oo)) & ! (Pout4 \in [1, oo) && P2 \in [1, oo) && P3 \in [1, oo))]]

..
EG iterations: 2
-> the formula is TRUE

FORMULA p_1478_fireability_and_notx TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS

mc time: 0m0sec


total processing time: 0m22sec

STOP 1369521629

--------------------
content from stderr:

check if there are places and transitions
ok
check if there are transitions without pre-places
ok
check if at least one transition is enabled in m0
ok
check if there are transitions that can never fire
ok


initing FirstDep: 0m0sec

86230 18648 13623
iterations count:3366 (210), effective:1050 (65)

initing FirstDep: 0m0sec


iterations count:23 (1), effective:2 (0)

iterations count:16 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:23 (1), effective:1 (0)

iterations count:16 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:16 (1), effective:0 (0)

iterations count:81 (5), effective:19 (1)

iterations count:36 (2), effective:2 (0)

--------------------
content from /tmp/BenchKit_head_log_file.1665: