Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472282900898.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282900898
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 836K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K Jun 7 17:04 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Jun 7 17:04 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K Jun 7 17:04 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K Jun 7 17:04 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Jun 6 15:32 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 6 15:32 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 15:32 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Jun 6 15:32 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K Jun 7 17:05 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Jun 6 15:32 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:32 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 450K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654951152039

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 130 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Transformed 1295 places.
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Transformed 749 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1295 places and 749 transitions in 234 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1036 places in 9 ms
Reduce places removed 1036 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 259 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 259/259 places, 749/749 transitions.
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 240 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 240 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 257 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 242 transition count 509
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 282 place count 217 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 217 transition count 469
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 217 transition count 460
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 325 place count 208 transition count 451
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 208 transition count 451
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 338 place count 204 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 204 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 33 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 33 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 204 transition count 414
Applied a total of 375 rules in 62 ms. Remains 204 /259 variables (removed 55) and now considering 414/749 (removed 335) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 414 rows 204 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 414 rows 204 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:13] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 272 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:39:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 859 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 414 rows 204 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:14] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 177 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/259 places, 414/749 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 204/259 places, 414/749 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 204 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-11 12:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 414 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 204 places (down from 72) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2220 resets, run finished after 556 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 73) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 109 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 66) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 66 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 414 rows 204 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:16] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:17] [INFO ] After 470ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:65
[2022-06-11 12:39:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 3 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:20] [INFO ] After 2787ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :58
[2022-06-11 12:39:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 272 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:39:26] [INFO ] After 6173ms SMT Verify possible using 272 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :8 sat :58
[2022-06-11 12:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:39:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 186 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-06-11 12:39:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 97 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:33] [INFO ] After 13483ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :9 sat :57
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 5988 ms.
[2022-06-11 12:39:39] [INFO ] After 22777ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :9 sat :57
Fused 66 Parikh solutions to 57 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 6 properties in 868 ms.
Support contains 47 out of 204 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 734 edges and 204 vertex of which 203 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 203 transition count 412
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 192 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 192 transition count 397
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 192 transition count 381
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 184 transition count 373
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 184 transition count 373
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 184 transition count 371
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 179 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 179 transition count 366
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 179 transition count 349
Applied a total of 86 rules in 67 ms. Remains 179 /204 variables (removed 25) and now considering 349/414 (removed 65) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 179/204 places, 349/414 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2249 resets, run finished after 440 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 38 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 118 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 98 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 51) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 287967 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=95 ) properties seen :{0=1, 1=1, 2=1, 3=1, 4=1, 5=1, 6=1, 7=1, 8=1, 9=1, 10=1, 11=1, 12=1, 15=1, 18=1, 20=1, 21=1, 22=1, 23=1, 24=1, 25=1, 26=1, 27=1, 28=1, 29=1, 31=1, 32=1, 33=1, 35=1, 36=1, 37=1, 38=1, 39=1, 40=1, 41=1, 43=1, 44=1, 45=1, 46=1, 48=1, 49=1, 50=1}
Probabilistic random walk after 287967 steps, saw 117217 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=95 ) properties seen :42
Running SMT prover for 9 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 349 rows 179 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:44] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:45] [INFO ] After 219ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:9
[2022-06-11 12:39:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-11 12:39:45] [INFO ] After 341ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :9
[2022-06-11 12:39:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 223 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:39:46] [INFO ] After 454ms SMT Verify possible using 223 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :9
[2022-06-11 12:39:46] [INFO ] After 1058ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :9
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 542 ms.
[2022-06-11 12:39:47] [INFO ] After 2034ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :9
Fused 9 Parikh solutions to 7 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 59 ms.
Support contains 11 out of 179 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 179/179 places, 349/349 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 156 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 156 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 156 transition count 221
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 136 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 136 transition count 201
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 136 transition count 194
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 126 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 126 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 126 transition count 178
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 124 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 124 transition count 175
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 122 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 122 transition count 173
Applied a total of 127 rules in 29 ms. Remains 122 /179 variables (removed 57) and now considering 173/349 (removed 176) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 122/179 places, 173/349 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2228 resets, run finished after 190 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 463 resets, run finished after 73 ms. (steps per millisecond=136 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 1018 resets, run finished after 65 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 1039 resets, run finished after 159 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 490 resets, run finished after 119 ms. (steps per millisecond=84 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 487 resets, run finished after 68 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 481 resets, run finished after 68 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 463 resets, run finished after 67 ms. (steps per millisecond=149 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 468 resets, run finished after 64 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 464 resets, run finished after 66 ms. (steps per millisecond=151 ) properties (out of 9) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 313106 steps, run visited all 9 properties in 2152 ms. (steps per millisecond=145 )
Probabilistic random walk after 313106 steps, saw 118174 distinct states, run finished after 2152 ms. (steps per millisecond=145 ) properties seen :9
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 414 transitions.
Support contains 53 out of 204 places (down from 55) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 82 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 167 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 167 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 167 transition count 226
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 133 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 133 transition count 192
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 133 transition count 178
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 115 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 115 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 115 transition count 147
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 110 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 110 transition count 140
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 105 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 105 transition count 135
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 231 place count 101 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 101 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 101 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 97 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 97 transition count 123
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 95 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 95 transition count 121
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 94 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 94 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 93 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 93 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 92 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 92 transition count 117
Applied a total of 256 rules in 18 ms. Remains 92 /204 variables (removed 112) and now considering 117/414 (removed 297) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 17 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 56 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 298 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 92 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/204 places, 117/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 92/204 places, 117/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7380068135125085489.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1900565838774150940.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7380068135125085489.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1900565838774150940.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,98965,0.478836,23540,2,2964,5,77325,6,0,485,32904,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l1188>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1200>=1)))) U EG(!(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l922>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l922>=1))))))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l922>=1)))))))) U (!(E...262
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t44, t48, t50, t53, t54, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73...385
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.49511,109008,1,0,568,595327,263,313,3338,357262,652
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 167 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 167 transition count 240
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 167 transition count 235
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 133 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 133 transition count 201
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 133 transition count 188
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 115 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 115 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 115 transition count 155
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 111 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 111 transition count 149
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 107 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 107 transition count 145
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 104 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 104 transition count 141
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 101 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 101 transition count 138
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 99 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 99 transition count 136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 241 place count 98 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 98 transition count 134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 97 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 97 transition count 133
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 96 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 96 transition count 132
Applied a total of 246 rules in 18 ms. Remains 96 /204 variables (removed 108) and now considering 132/414 (removed 282) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 96 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 96 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 69 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 96 cols
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 80 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/204 places, 132/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/204 places, 132/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9926973867927731163.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:39:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12964693635703784764.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9926973867927731163.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12964693635703784764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,98133,1.26133,48144,2,3234,5,204508,6,0,516,64417,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1186>=1))) U AF(E(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1188>=1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(E(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1188>=1))))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(E(!...333
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t45, t47, t51, t53, t55, t57, t59, t70, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85...412
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,5.41015,151036,1,0,819,841753,301,494,3532,465892,997
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 172 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 172 transition count 268
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 172 transition count 261
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 146 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 146 transition count 235
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 146 transition count 224
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 133 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 133 transition count 209
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 133 transition count 199
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 131 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 131 transition count 197
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 176 place count 129 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 129 transition count 195
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 128 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 128 transition count 193
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 127 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 127 transition count 192
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 126 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 126 transition count 191
Applied a total of 184 rules in 11 ms. Remains 126 /204 variables (removed 78) and now considering 191/414 (removed 223) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 126 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 126 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 103 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 258 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 335 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 126 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 76 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/204 places, 191/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 126/204 places, 191/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9928886341835570115.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5685497099028903305.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9928886341835570115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5685497099028903305.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,160469,1.57515,64604,2,5073,5,199727,6,0,695,63569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1194>=1)))) + A(E(A(((p13>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))) U E(((s1>=1)&&(l1190>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l28>=1)))) U ...427
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!((EX(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l161>=1)))))) * EX(((((s1>=1)&&(l1200>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l1190>=1)))||(...1515
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t11, t20, t29, t30, t31, t32, t34, t35, t36, t38, t43, t45, t57, t58, t59, t60, t69, ...506
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,14.8794,399060,1,0,1862,2.20992e+06,455,994,4967,1.34506e+06,2095
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 165 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 165 transition count 218
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 165 transition count 215
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 129 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 129 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 129 transition count 164
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 109 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 109 transition count 141
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 109 transition count 129
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 103 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 103 transition count 121
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 97 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 97 transition count 115
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 93 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 93 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 93 transition count 108
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 89 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 89 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 264 place count 87 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 87 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 267 place count 86 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 86 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 85 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 85 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 84 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 84 transition count 98
Applied a total of 272 rules in 9 ms. Remains 84 /204 variables (removed 120) and now considering 98/414 (removed 316) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:15] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 49 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/204 places, 98/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 84/204 places, 98/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8779316674412471567.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11017311396838429608.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8779316674412471567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11017311396838429608.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,67981,0.26609,16184,2,2431,5,48429,6,0,434,24738,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((s1>=1)&&(l1186>=1))) * EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l1186>=1))))) * TRUE)] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t44, t46, t59, t67, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t84, t85, t88, t89...275
(forward)formula 0,1,0.758939,30808,1,0,195,122367,217,104,2911,59784,255
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 173 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 173 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 173 transition count 271
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 147 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 147 transition count 245
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 147 transition count 238
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 134 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 134 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 134 transition count 208
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 131 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 131 transition count 203
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 128 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 128 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 127 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 127 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 126 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 126 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 125 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 125 transition count 196
Applied a total of 187 rules in 10 ms. Remains 125 /204 variables (removed 79) and now considering 196/414 (removed 218) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 125 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:16] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 125 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 110 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 225 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 308 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 125 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 100 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/204 places, 196/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 125/204 places, 196/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9190843806327226248.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18022898901982335964.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9190843806327226248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18022898901982335964.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,179061,2.2923,83996,2,4974,5,286507,6,0,696,80989,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EX(EG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l161>=1))))) * EF(AX(((s2>=1)&&(l152>=1))))) * (AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1196>=1))) * (EG(((s1>=1)&&(l202>=1))) + ((s1>=1...386
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EX(EG(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l161>=1))))) * E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((s2>=1)&&(l152>=1))))))) * (!...1039
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t32, t33, t34, t40, t42, t44, t45, t57, t58, t59, t60, t68, t70,...538
(forward)formula 0,0,9.23639,264148,1,0,946,1.35724e+06,455,407,4865,703577,1227
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 169 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 169 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 169 transition count 237
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 137 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 137 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 137 transition count 193
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 121 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 121 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 121 transition count 164
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 117 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 117 transition count 158
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 113 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 113 transition count 154
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 111 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 111 transition count 152
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 111 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 109 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 109 transition count 146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 224 place count 108 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 108 transition count 145
Applied a total of 225 rules in 9 ms. Remains 108 /204 variables (removed 96) and now considering 145/414 (removed 269) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 108 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:26] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 108 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:26] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 71 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 108 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:26] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/204 places, 145/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/204 places, 145/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 145 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1012632688940342923.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5887289158698414133.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1012632688940342923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5887289158698414133.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,117737,0.635443,30476,2,4579,5,91949,6,0,577,44376,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(E(!(((s1<1)||(l1193<1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l917>=1))) U E(((s1>=1)&&(l1192>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l356>=1)))) * (EG(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l1189>=1)))...189
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l1192>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l356>=1)))) U (!(E(!(((s1<1)||(l1193<1))) ...634
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t11, t19, t23, t25, t26, t28, t29, t43, t44, t45, t46, t49, t50, t51, t52, t57, t60, t63,...514
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,4.37434,142392,1,0,501,691953,336,249,4067,433258,571
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 165 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 165 transition count 218
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 165 transition count 215
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 129 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 129 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 129 transition count 164
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 109 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 109 transition count 141
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 109 transition count 129
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 226 place count 103 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 103 transition count 121
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 97 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 97 transition count 115
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 248 place count 93 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 93 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 93 transition count 108
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 89 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 89 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 264 place count 87 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 87 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 267 place count 86 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 86 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 85 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 85 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 271 place count 84 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 84 transition count 98
Applied a total of 272 rules in 26 ms. Remains 84 /204 variables (removed 120) and now considering 98/414 (removed 316) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 52 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/204 places, 98/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 84/204 places, 98/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2247 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 487 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=1666 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 46256 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=906 )
Probabilistic random walk after 46256 steps, saw 19471 distinct states, run finished after 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=906 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 173 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 173 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 173 transition count 271
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 147 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 147 transition count 245
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 147 transition count 236
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 133 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 133 transition count 218
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 133 transition count 205
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 176 place count 130 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 130 transition count 200
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 127 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 127 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 126 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 126 transition count 195
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 125 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 125 transition count 194
Applied a total of 189 rules in 8 ms. Remains 125 /204 variables (removed 79) and now considering 194/414 (removed 220) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 125 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 125 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 111 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 266 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 343 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 125 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 83 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/204 places, 194/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 125/204 places, 194/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3517253721224045030.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12171421037326667921.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3517253721224045030.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12171421037326667921.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,141813,2.36028,78048,2,5584,5,248295,6,0,694,87252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((AF(((s6<1)||(l39<1))) * !(A(((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l957>=1))))) * ((s1>=1)&&(l1189>=1))) * ((((EF(!(A(((s1>=1)&&(l199>=...332
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((!(EG(!(((s6<1)||(l39<1))))) * !(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l957>=1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1))) * !(((s...598
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t15, t16, t29, t30, t31, t38, t40, t42, t44, t45, t50, t58, t59, t60, t61, t66, t69, ...673
(forward)formula 0,0,10.0268,269956,1,0,748,1.1299e+06,443,322,4929,638107,966
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 169 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 169 transition count 252
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 169 transition count 246
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 137 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 137 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 137 transition count 202
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 121 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 121 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 121 transition count 173
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 118 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 118 transition count 168
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 115 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 115 transition count 165
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 113 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 113 transition count 163
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 111 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 111 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 110 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 110 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 109 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 109 transition count 158
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 108 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 108 transition count 157
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 107 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 107 transition count 156
Applied a total of 223 rules in 16 ms. Remains 107 /204 variables (removed 97) and now considering 156/414 (removed 258) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 288 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/204 places, 156/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 107/204 places, 156/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7661075131919375615.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3257401129645999252.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7661075131919375615.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3257401129645999252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,132237,1.61792,58068,2,3773,5,231678,6,0,584,69506,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((s1>=1)&&(l1198>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l917>=1))) + EX((((EF(((s1<1)||(l1197<1))) * AG(((s1<1)||(l1195<1)))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l1193>=1))) + AG...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((s1>=1)&&(l1198>=1))) * ((s1>=1)&&(l917>=1)))] != FALSE + (([((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l1197...324
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/144/154
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t35, t37, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t50, t53, t56, t58, t62, t63, t66, t69, t79, t80, t81,...450
(forward)formula 0,0,2.67953,61680,1,0,277,256221,344,143,4123,127100,390
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 167 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 167 transition count 223
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 167 transition count 221
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 132 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 132 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 17 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 17 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 132 transition count 169
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 113 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 113 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 113 transition count 136
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 107 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 107 transition count 128
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 101 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 101 transition count 122
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 98 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 98 transition count 116
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 95 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 95 transition count 113
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 93 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 93 transition count 111
Applied a total of 254 rules in 12 ms. Remains 93 /204 variables (removed 111) and now considering 111/414 (removed 303) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 51 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 93 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/204 places, 111/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 93/204 places, 111/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9564167468734500187.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7469653448332846307.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9564167468734500187.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7469653448332846307.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,72239,0.243138,14908,2,2950,5,37315,6,0,483,22455,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AG(((s1>=1)&&(l163>=1))) + (AG(AF(((s1<1)||(l224<1)))) * EX(AF(((s1<1)||(l1193<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l163>=1))))))),TRUE),!(((s1<1)||(l224<1))))] = FALSE * [((EY(I...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t18, t22, t26, t27, t33, t34, t47, t48, t57, t60, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76,...356
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/107/109
(forward)formula 0,1,1.25143,47712,1,0,272,161401,262,110,3645,108948,331
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 170 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 170 transition count 256
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 170 transition count 250
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 139 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 139 transition count 219
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 139 transition count 205
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 123 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 123 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 123 transition count 174
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 119 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 119 transition count 168
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 115 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 115 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 114 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 114 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 113 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 113 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 112 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 112 transition count 161
Applied a total of 216 rules in 16 ms. Remains 112 /204 variables (removed 92) and now considering 161/414 (removed 253) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 112 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 112 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 200 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 255 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 112 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/204 places, 161/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 112/204 places, 161/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9501527748014447994.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6107400093453186957.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9501527748014447994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6107400093453186957.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,116377,1.0594,41528,2,4065,5,130391,6,0,609,52825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(AG(!(E(((s1>=1)&&(l164>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l1187>=1)))))) U (AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1196>=1))) * EF(!(((!(((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1))) + EF(((s1>=1)...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1196>=1))))) * E(TRUE U !(((!(((s1>=1)&&(l1201>=1))) + E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(...603
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t18, t22, t26, t27, t31, t33, t44, t46, t49, t50, t51, t52, t60, t62, t65, t66, t70, t72,...493
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,7.02744,195468,1,0,729,987595,367,401,4255,602774,940
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 169 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 169 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 169 transition count 237
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 137 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 137 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 137 transition count 192
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 119 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 119 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 119 transition count 160
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 115 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 115 transition count 155
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 212 place count 111 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 111 transition count 151
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 109 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 109 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 107 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 107 transition count 146
Applied a total of 224 rules in 10 ms. Remains 107 /204 variables (removed 97) and now considering 146/414 (removed 268) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 75 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 107 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 68 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/204 places, 146/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 107/204 places, 146/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11254103994935162829.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6090800599012484848.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11254103994935162829.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6090800599012484848.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,106453,0.816045,36124,2,3863,5,112630,6,0,574,45012,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l1189>=1))) U A(((EX((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l25>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l915>=1)))) * (p25>=1)) * (l0>=1)) U EX(AG((((s1>=1)&&(l1195>=1...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(((s1>=1)&&(l1189>=1)))) * !(EG(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((s1>=1)&&(l1195>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l1187>=1)))))...413
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t18, t22, t25, t26, t28, t29, t38, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t55, t61, t64, t77, t86, ...413
(forward)formula 0,0,1.65354,44840,1,0,254,168925,319,119,3917,93475,315
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 414/414 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 170 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 170 transition count 273
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 170 transition count 265
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 139 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 139 transition count 234
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 139 transition count 223
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 123 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 123 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 123 transition count 190
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 120 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 120 transition count 186
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 204 place count 117 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 117 transition count 183
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 115 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 115 transition count 180
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 213 place count 113 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 113 transition count 178
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 112 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 112 transition count 177
Applied a total of 217 rules in 9 ms. Remains 112 /204 variables (removed 92) and now considering 177/414 (removed 237) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 112 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 112 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 101 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-11 12:40:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 216 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 286 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 112 cols
[2022-06-11 12:40:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 86 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/204 places, 177/414 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 112/204 places, 177/414 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 177 transitions.
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9296072349395730069.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-11 12:40:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5813298711539608009.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9296072349395730069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5813298711539608009.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,122209,1.8073,70192,2,4096,5,257338,6,0,625,71778,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((((s1>=1)&&(l1187>=1)) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1186>=1)))) * ((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1194>=1))) + AX(((s1>=1)&&(l1187>=1)))) + ((s1<1)||(l1200<...267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((((s1>=1)&&(l1187>=1)) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l1186>=1)))) * ((!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&...736
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t17, t21, t24, t25, t26, t27, t43, t44, t45, t46, t56, t58, t61, t65, t67, t70, t71, t82,...495
(forward)formula 0,0,5.41382,148632,1,0,536,735838,388,238,4362,374158,709
FORMULA SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-06-11 12:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-11 12:41:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Total runtime 109328 ms.

BK_STOP 1654951262579

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472282900898"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06.tgz
mv SieveSingleMsgMbox-PT-d1m06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;