Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472281800162.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800162
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Jun 7 17:15 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K Jun 7 17:15 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Jun 7 17:15 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Jun 7 17:15 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 6 15:24 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K Jun 7 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K Jun 7 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Jun 7 17:15 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Jun 7 17:15 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654774580688

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 92 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions in 196 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 100 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 137
Applied a total of 22 rules in 24 ms. Remains 100 /109 variables (removed 9) and now considering 137/150 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 359 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 109 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/109 places, 137/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 100/109 places, 137/150 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 100 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2317 resets, run finished after 517 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 71) seen :28
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 43) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 42) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 41) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 75 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 40) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 40) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 78 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 156 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=58 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 114 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 111 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 46 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 112 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 33) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 33 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 100 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:23] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:36:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:36:24] [INFO ] After 188ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :3 sat :0 real:30
[2022-06-09 11:36:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:36:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:36:25] [INFO ] After 646ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :28
[2022-06-09 11:36:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:25] [INFO ] After 458ms SMT Verify possible using 62 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :28
[2022-06-09 11:36:25] [INFO ] After 977ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :28
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 424 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:36:26] [INFO ] After 2233ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :28
Fused 33 Parikh solutions to 28 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 190 ms.
Support contains 33 out of 100 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 296 edges and 100 vertex of which 99 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 99 transition count 135
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 94 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 94 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 94 transition count 125
Applied a total of 16 rules in 21 ms. Remains 94 /100 variables (removed 6) and now considering 125/137 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 94/100 places, 125/137 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2299 resets, run finished after 287 ms. (steps per millisecond=34 ) properties (out of 28) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 87 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 92 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 64 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 104 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 82755 steps, run visited all 26 properties in 432 ms. (steps per millisecond=191 )
Probabilistic random walk after 82755 steps, saw 34276 distinct states, run finished after 432 ms. (steps per millisecond=191 ) properties seen :26
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 137 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 100 places (down from 66) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 82 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 82 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 82 transition count 103
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 74 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 74 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 74 transition count 94
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 72 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 72 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 72 transition count 90
Applied a total of 60 rules in 12 ms. Remains 72 /100 variables (removed 28) and now considering 90/137 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/100 places, 90/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 72/100 places, 90/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1878264536177841012.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15523976388700937440.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1878264536177841012.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15523976388700937440.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.32829e+07,7.38265,197380,2,18887,5,710312,6,0,378,729323,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U (A((!(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) * EF(((s1>=1)&&(l37>=1)))) U AF(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))) + AG(EX((((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1))...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U (!((E(!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))))) U (!((!(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) * E(TR...448
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t56, t57, t6...376
(forward)formula 0,0,21.2229,431936,1,0,233,2.11863e+06,206,96,2686,1.81446e+06,253
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 66 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 66 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 65 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 65 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 64 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 63 transition count 73
Applied a total of 80 rules in 17 ms. Remains 63 /100 variables (removed 37) and now considering 73/137 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 49 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/100 places, 73/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/100 places, 73/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15053922230670582695.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5575366760359488785.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15053922230670582695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5575366760359488785.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.94667e+06,2.74815,87792,2,14183,5,273576,6,0,325,357985,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((((p37<1)||(l122<1))&&((s5<1)||(l0<1)))) + AF((AG(((s1<1)||(l355<1))) * EX(((s4<1)||(l0<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p37<1)||(l122<1))&&((s5<1)||(l0<1)))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t43, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t6...301
(forward)formula 0,1,12.6761,319536,1,0,180,1.52536e+06,168,77,2262,1.40234e+06,200
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 81 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 81 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 81 transition count 102
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 74 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 74 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 73 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 73 transition count 94
Applied a total of 56 rules in 16 ms. Remains 73 /100 variables (removed 27) and now considering 94/137 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/100 places, 94/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 73/100 places, 94/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10369230663552843872.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7479204083763271229.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10369230663552843872.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7479204083763271229.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.28483e+07,6.44961,171600,2,17664,5,760156,6,0,386,558571,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!(EX(AF(((p19>=1)&&(l126>=1))))) + (AF(((p19>=1)&&(l126>=1))) * AG(((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1)))))) U (AF(!(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))) * (EX(AG((...299
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))))) * (EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1)))))) + (!(EG(!(!(!(EX...926
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t60, t61, t69, t70, t71, t72,...359
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:37:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:37:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11218234242199015298.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11218234242199015298.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11218234242199015298.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11218234242199015298.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11218234242199015298.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:37:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:37:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:37:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 88 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 63 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5994796838700518851.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9304704709270107395.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5994796838700518851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9304704709270107395.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.28483e+07,2.55813,83064,1494,1075,80564,28355,298,390358,98,314142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!(EX(AF(((i0.u9.p19>=1)&&(i4.u7.l126>=1))))) + (AF(((i0.u9.p19>=1)&&(i4.u7.l126>=1))) * AG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u3.l32>=1)))))) U (AF...409
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u11.l354>=1)))))) * (EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i3.u10.l353...1184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t8, t9, t28, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t61, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t7...341
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 78 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 78 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 78 transition count 97
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 66 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 66 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 64 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 64 transition count 75
Applied a total of 78 rules in 13 ms. Remains 64 /100 variables (removed 36) and now considering 75/137 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 39 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/100 places, 75/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 64/100 places, 75/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8457514205918089878.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16213853517559170679.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8457514205918089878.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16213853517559170679.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.9752e+06,3.39753,98632,2,12358,5,410372,6,0,331,315541,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(EG(((AX(((s1<1)||(l491<1))) + (p16<1)) + (l115<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(((!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l491<1))))) + (p16<1)) + (l115<1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t45, t47, t48, t49, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t6...311
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,21.2576,517076,1,0,306,2.98523e+06,181,157,2327,2.62028e+06,323
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 80 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 80 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 80 transition count 101
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 71 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 69 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 69 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 69 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 68 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 68 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 67 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 67 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 66 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 66 transition count 80
Applied a total of 74 rules in 20 ms. Remains 66 /100 variables (removed 34) and now considering 80/137 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 56 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/100 places, 80/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 66/100 places, 80/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7635723054476740344.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5568216312438080061.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7635723054476740344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5568216312438080061.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.07123e+06,5.17423,117496,2,15902,5,398316,6,0,344,538077,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((s1<1)||(l149<1))) * (EG(((s1>=1)&&(l125>=1))) + !(A(((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1)) U ((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l149<1)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(!((E(!(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t48, t49, t57, t58, t5...356
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6677621083421995761.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6677621083421995761.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6677621083421995761.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6677621083421995761.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6677621083421995761.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 33 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4724717735522368154.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6221115929745057992.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4724717735522368154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6221115929745057992.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.07123e+06,6.78297,119724,2129,448,141405,3346,274,318112,65,26575,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((i4.u3.s1<1)||(i5.u8.l149<1))) * (EG(((i4.u3.s1>=1)&&(i5.u11.l125>=1))) + !(A(((i4.u3.s1>=1)&&(i0.u6.l490>=1)) U ((i4.u7.s5>=1)&&...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((i4.u3.s1<1)||(i5.u8.l149<1)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(!((E(!(((i...359
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t9, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t48, t49, t57, t58, t59, t61, t62, t63, ...351
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 81 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 81 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 81 transition count 104
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 72 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 72 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 71 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 71 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 70 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 92
Applied a total of 61 rules in 12 ms. Remains 70 /100 variables (removed 30) and now considering 92/137 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/100 places, 92/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 70/100 places, 92/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8425459990835032828.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7581927734517495254.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8425459990835032828.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7581927734517495254.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.20114e+07,6.14373,137156,2,14879,5,596130,6,0,372,477256,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(AG(EX(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l149<1)))))) U (AF(((s1<1)||(l149<1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))) U (AX(A(A(((s1>=1)&&(l336>=1)) U ((p27>=1)&&(l0>...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(!((E(!(((EX(((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + ((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))) U (!...1921
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t51, t52, t53, t59, t6...376
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17917371490889874783.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17917371490889874783.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17917371490889874783.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17917371490889874783.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17917371490889874783.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 90 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 64 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17337724227560099058.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3414791771938397836.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17337724227560099058.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3414791771938397836.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.20114e+07,19.4605,281224,2252,665,222743,7741,255,2.18529e+06,86,102563,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(AG(EX(EX(!(((i2.u3.s1<1)||(i0.u8.l149<1)))))) U (AF(((i2.u3.s1<1)||(i0.u8.l149<1))) + ((i2.u3.s1>=1)&&(i5.u10.l337>=1)))) U (AX(A(A((...432
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(!((E(!(((EX(((i7.u2.p30>=1)&&(i2.u3.l0>=1))) + ((i5.u10.p18>=1)&&(i5.u13.l115>=1))) + (...2623
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t9, t30, t32, t33, t34, t51, t52, t53, t67, t68, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t...325
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 78 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 78 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 78 transition count 95
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 67 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 67 transition count 83
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 64 transition count 76
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 62 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 62 transition count 73
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 60 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 60 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 60 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 59 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 59 transition count 68
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 59 transition count 66
Applied a total of 89 rules in 14 ms. Remains 59 /100 variables (removed 41) and now considering 66/137 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 42 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/100 places, 66/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/100 places, 66/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16767272282772195804.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14482326611966969356.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16767272282772195804.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14482326611966969356.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.31111e+06,2.10896,65132,2,11780,5,251594,6,0,302,231802,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(A(!(AG(((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1))) U (!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1)...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t41, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t5...291
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8473079059290414529.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8473079059290414529.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8473079059290414529.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8473079059290414529.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8473079059290414529.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 62 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16780234379564613127.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7611626031697086458.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16780234379564613127.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7611626031697086458.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.31111e+06,0.241201,15676,1007,437,19441,2047,226,36826,69,15326,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(A(!(AG(((i6.u12.p30>=1)&&(i1.u0.l0>=1)))) U ((i1.u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u0.l110>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(!((E(!(((i1.u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u0.l110>=1))) U (!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i6.u12.p30>=1)&&(i1.u0.l0>=1))))))...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t9, t28, t41, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t63, ...289
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,3.68428,126140,1,0,238446,15743,999,329790,410,108694,447499
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 77 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 77 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 92 rules in 15 ms. Remains 58 /100 variables (removed 42) and now considering 64/137 (removed 73) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 38 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/100 places, 64/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 58/100 places, 64/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4027434243999511279.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3302191988205222235.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4027434243999511279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3302191988205222235.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.28703e+06,1.07502,40852,2,10587,5,133082,6,0,296,156612,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l124>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l124>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...286
(forward)formula 0,0,5.84615,161816,1,0,158,728002,149,68,2013,686597,172
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 82 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 82 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 82 transition count 101
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 74 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 73 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 73 transition count 92
Applied a total of 55 rules in 6 ms. Remains 73 /100 variables (removed 27) and now considering 92/137 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 52 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/100 places, 92/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 73/100 places, 92/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12155673949719223447.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16298315741332612621.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12155673949719223447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16298315741332612621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76416e+07,8.48092,205700,2,18915,5,880087,6,0,384,739423,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EX((((EG((((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))||((p32>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + (!(((s1>=1)&&(l503>=1))) * AF(((s1>=1)&&(l1>=1))))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))||(...386
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(!(((p24>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE ...633
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t48, t49, t50, t56, t58, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t7...346
(forward)formula 0,1,12.4544,205700,1,0,183,880087,216,70,2732,739423,205
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 79 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 79 transition count 100
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 70 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 70 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 68 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 67 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 81
Applied a total of 72 rules in 11 ms. Remains 66 /100 variables (removed 34) and now considering 81/137 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/100 places, 81/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 66/100 places, 81/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13458482013846291452.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2616416201620033634.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13458482013846291452.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2616416201620033634.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02232e+07,2.77725,85844,2,10064,5,371269,6,0,345,314903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF(((s1<1)||(l353<1)))) + AG(((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(((s1<1)||(l353<1)))))))),TRUE) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l504>=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t42, t43, t44, t50, t53, t54, t55, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t6...331
(forward)formula 0,1,21.4716,534556,1,0,332,2.98182e+06,193,144,2426,2.8729e+06,367
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 79 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 79 transition count 100
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 68 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 66 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 66 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 65 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 64 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 63 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 63 transition count 77
Applied a total of 80 rules in 20 ms. Remains 63 /100 variables (removed 37) and now considering 77/137 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 49 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/100 places, 77/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/100 places, 77/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1912317760966152073.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:41:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10535674832145420504.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1912317760966152073.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10535674832145420504.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.03308e+06,5.72852,152540,2,16842,5,614407,6,0,329,563208,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) * (AG(AX(((s1<1)||(l150<1)))) + AF((EF(((s1<1)||(l510<1))) * AF(((p29<1)||(l0<1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) * (!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l150<1)))))))) + !(EG(!((E(TRUE U ...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t48, t56, t57, t58, t5...341
(forward)formula 0,1,21.3906,474312,1,0,282,2.40717e+06,195,123,2329,2.13797e+06,330
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 82 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 82 transition count 109
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 73 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 100
Applied a total of 54 rules in 19 ms. Remains 73 /100 variables (removed 27) and now considering 100/137 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 73 cols
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 84 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/100 places, 100/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 73/100 places, 100/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13634022877675908197.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6381550162130557256.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13634022877675908197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6381550162130557256.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.28764e+07,6.11696,161028,2,12170,5,712175,6,0,392,465123,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((s1>=1)&&(l501>=1))) + (EF(((((s1<1)||(l510<1))||(((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1))))||(((s1>=1)&&(l497>=1))&&((s2>=1)&&(l49...363
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((s1>=1)&&(l501>=1)))] != FALSE + [(((Init * E(TRUE U ((((s1<1)||(l510<1))||(((p30>=1)&&(l0...549
(forward)formula 0,1,6.12199,161028,1,0,7,712175,8,1,400,465123,1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 78 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 78 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 78 transition count 97
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 68 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 66 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 66 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 66 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 65 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 64 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 63 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 63 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 63 transition count 77
Applied a total of 78 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /100 variables (removed 37) and now considering 77/137 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/100 places, 77/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/100 places, 77/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16371428328674467453.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3475055037642142828.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16371428328674467453.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3475055037642142828.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.12408e+06,3.03929,91132,2,12602,5,345888,6,0,329,313714,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EG(A((!(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1))) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))) U (EF(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))) + !(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))))))) * AX(((s1>=1)&&(l0>...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(EG(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))) + !(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))))) U (!((!(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1)))...381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t41, t42, t48, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t6...311
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18257716928162371708.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18257716928162371708.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18257716928162371708.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18257716928162371708.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18257716928162371708.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 62 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:42:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9609894571473501346.gal : 30 ms
[2022-06-09 11:42:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9890002737562235063.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9609894571473501346.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9890002737562235063.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.12408e+06,2.39947,59960,1301,1003,59676,9520,222,296809,109,122021,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EG(A((!(((u2.s1>=1)&&(i2.u4.l7>=1))) + EX(((u2.s1>=1)&&(u2.l509>=1)))) U (EF(((u2.s1>=1)&&(i3.u9.l354>=1))) + !(((u2.s1>=1)&&(u10.l34...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(EG(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((u2.s1>=1)&&(i3.u9.l354>=1))) + !(((u2.s1>=1)&&(u10.l345>=1))))) U (!((!(((u...450
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t28, t40, t41, t42, t48, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, ...305
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 79 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 79 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 79 transition count 102
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 69 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 69 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 69 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 66 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 66 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 83
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 64 transition count 80
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 62 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 62 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 62 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 61 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 61 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 61 transition count 73
Applied a total of 86 rules in 8 ms. Remains 61 /100 variables (removed 39) and now considering 73/137 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/100 places, 73/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 61/100 places, 73/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7158745768899387498.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12035523169239939436.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7158745768899387498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12035523169239939436.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17804e+06,2.48124,70408,2,12702,5,241709,6,0,317,297956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(EG(EX(A(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1)) U !(((s1<1)||(l149<1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(EX(!((E(!(!(((s1<1)||(l149<1)))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1))) * !(!(((s1<1)||(l149<1)))))) + E...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t46, t47, t48, t49, t5...346
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,24.44,638928,1,0,441,3.26153e+06,180,208,2277,3.34762e+06,492
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 83 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 83 transition count 106
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 74 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 74 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 72 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 72 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 72 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 71 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 70 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 70 transition count 87
Applied a total of 64 rules in 9 ms. Remains 70 /100 variables (removed 30) and now considering 87/137 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 55 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/100 places, 87/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 70/100 places, 87/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7171499179806786100.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:43:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11050808996564473059.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7171499179806786100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11050808996564473059.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28464e+07,4.96871,115460,2,13064,5,474238,6,0,367,407212,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))) * (((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) + AF(((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1))))) * (!(A(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1)))) * (AG...349
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(((!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))))) * (((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) + !(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1))))))) * (...529
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t28, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t53, t56, t57, t58, t62, t63,...369
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14211297082515898568.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14211297082515898568.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14211297082515898568.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14211297082515898568.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14211297082515898568.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 96 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 69 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9770697636829191885.gal : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17228412312715583772.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9770697636829191885.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17228412312715583772.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28464e+07,12.0237,317060,3604,497,240390,13213,292,2.85786e+06,72,223481,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((AF(((i0.u1.s1>=1)&&(i4.u10.l33>=1))) * (((i0.u1.s1>=1)&&(i4.u9.l339>=1)) + AF(((i0.u1.s1>=1)&&(i2.u6.l90>=1))))) * (!(A(((i2.u4.s5>=...499
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(((!(EG(!(((i0.u1.s1>=1)&&(i4.u10.l33>=1))))) * (((i0.u1.s1>=1)&&(i4.u9.l339>=1)) + !(EG(!(((i...705
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t28, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t53, t56, t57, t58, t62, t63, t65, t66, t67, t68, ...349
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 137/137 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 90 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 90 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 90 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 88 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 88 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 87 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 87 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 87 transition count 112
Applied a total of 29 rules in 9 ms. Remains 87 /100 variables (removed 13) and now considering 112/137 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 87 cols
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 87 cols
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 87 cols
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 56 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/100 places, 112/137 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 87/100 places, 112/137 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9677853818814466705.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:44:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16515084997797772182.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9677853818814466705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16515084997797772182.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.97655e+07,17.1905,379572,2,39565,5,1.58792e+06,6,0,460,1.064e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((((AG((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))) + E(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l501>=1))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l112>=1))))) + ((...766
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EX((((!(E(TRUE U !((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))))) + E(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l501>=1))))) ...2301
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t19, t21, t26, t31, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t60, t62,...462
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2466293485447953093.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2466293485447953093.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2466293485447953093.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2466293485447953093.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2466293485447953093.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 128 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 78 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4786637725589106018.gal : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:45:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17286136646552900937.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4786637725589106018.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17286136646552900937.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7645922498422081269.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7645922498422081269.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7645922498422081269.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7645922498422081269.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7645922498422081269.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 136 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 110 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5739222883438044851.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:45:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3384188205771923816.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5739222883438044851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3384188205771923816.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.50188e+08,75.4997,1004264,8044,3046,609154,72512,339,7.72674e+06,144,2.04124e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!(EX(AF(((i4.u9.p19>=1)&&(i8.u14.l126>=1))))) + (AF(((i4.u9.p19>=1)&&(i8.u14.l126>=1))) * AG(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i1.u2.l32>=1)))))) U (...408
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i8.u7.l354>=1)))))) * (EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i8.u7.l353>=...1177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t7, t8, t9, t26, t32, t59, t60, t61, t73, t74, t75, t78, t79, t80, t85, t86, t87, t89...473
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2022-06-09 11:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:51:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11580022987576326657.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:51:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16338144210520896205.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11580022987576326657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16338144210520896205.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.50188e+08,59.7445,1294960,2,64593,5,4.59324e+06,6,0,537,3.0047e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!(EX(AF(((p19>=1)&&(l126>=1))))) + (AF(((p19>=1)&&(l126>=1))) * AG(((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1)))))) U (AF(!(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))) * (EX(AG((...299
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))))) * (EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1)))))) + (!(EG(!(!(!(EX...926
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t19, t21, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35,...577
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,422.276,3023652,1,0,342,1.83359e+07,10,183,1794,1.3053e+07,71
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((EF(((s1<1)||(l149<1))) * (EG(((s1>=1)&&(l125>=1))) + !(A(((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1)) U ((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l149<1)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(!((E(!(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=...286
(forward)formula 1,0,466.868,3023652,1,0,342,1.83359e+07,25,183,1856,1.3053e+07,340
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(A(AG(EX(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l149<1)))))) U (AF(((s1<1)||(l149<1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))) U (AX(A(A(((s1>=1)&&(l336>=1)) U ((p27>=1)&&(l0>...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(!((E(!(((EX(((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + ((p18>=1)&&(l115>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))) U (!...1921
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,0,643.424,3358020,1,0,619,2.00139e+07,53,320,1914,1.43508e+07,738
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(EG(A((!(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1))) + EX(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))) U (EF(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))) + !(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))))))) * AX(((s1>=1)&&(l0>...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(EG(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))) + !(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))))) U (!((!(((s1>=1)&&(l7>=1)))...381
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,1,759.286,3671284,1,0,619,2.21648e+07,28,320,1942,1.54277e+07,352
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (E(((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))) * (((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) + AF(((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1))))) * (!(A(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1)))) * (AG...349
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(((!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))))) * (((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1)) + !(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l90>=1))))))) * (...529
(forward)formula 4,1,781.929,3732844,1,0,619,2.22946e+07,55,327,1973,1.7257e+07,661
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX((((AG((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))) + E(AX(((s1>=1)&&(l501>=1))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l490>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l112>=1))))) + ((...766
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EX((((!(E(TRUE U !((((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))&&((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1)))))) + E(!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l501>=1))))) ...2301
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 5,0,1316.72,5181352,1,0,730,3.1977e+07,40,414,1960,2.36903e+07,568
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 2212903 ms.

BK_STOP 1654776794832

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800162"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m08 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;