Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472281800154.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800154
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 488K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Jun 7 17:10 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K Jun 7 17:10 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Jun 7 17:10 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Jun 7 17:10 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 6 15:23 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Jun 6 15:23 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 6 15:24 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Jun 7 17:10 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K Jun 7 17:10 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K Jun 7 17:10 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K Jun 7 17:10 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:24 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654774500746

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-09 11:35:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-09 11:35:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 95 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions in 196 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 96 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 133
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 132
Applied a total of 32 rules in 25 ms. Remains 95 /109 variables (removed 14) and now considering 132/150 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 95 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 14 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 95 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 59 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 319 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 95 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 94 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/109 places, 132/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 95/109 places, 132/150 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 95 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2280 resets, run finished after 559 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 63) seen :27
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 85 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 36) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 36) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 35) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 94 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 103 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 35 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 96 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 89 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 34) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 34 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 95 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:35:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:35:04] [INFO ] After 462ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :4 sat :0 real:30
[2022-06-09 11:35:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:35:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:35:05] [INFO ] After 390ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :30
[2022-06-09 11:35:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 59 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:05] [INFO ] After 365ms SMT Verify possible using 59 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :30
[2022-06-09 11:35:06] [INFO ] After 889ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :30
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 350 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:35:06] [INFO ] After 1921ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :4 sat :30
Fused 34 Parikh solutions to 30 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 14 properties in 75 ms.
Support contains 20 out of 95 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 84 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 84 transition count 113
Applied a total of 22 rules in 17 ms. Remains 84 /95 variables (removed 11) and now considering 113/132 (removed 19) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 84/95 places, 113/132 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2284 resets, run finished after 257 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 101 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 40 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 200 resets, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 14902 steps, run visited all 16 properties in 154 ms. (steps per millisecond=96 )
Probabilistic random walk after 14902 steps, saw 6805 distinct states, run finished after 155 ms. (steps per millisecond=96 ) properties seen :16
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 75 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 75 transition count 94
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 67 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 67 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 67 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 64 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 64 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 64 transition count 77
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 62 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 62 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 60 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 60 transition count 72
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 60 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 59 transition count 67
Applied a total of 79 rules in 19 ms. Remains 59 /95 variables (removed 36) and now considering 67/132 (removed 65) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 52 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/95 places, 67/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/95 places, 67/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2516183748801107597.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10025529347313803989.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2516183748801107597.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10025529347313803989.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,599530,0.403337,19312,2,6515,5,58662,6,0,303,55280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(AF(((s2<1)||(l496<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),!(((s2<1)||(l496<1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 62/4/5
(forward)formula 0,1,1.1631,39768,1,0,16,161300,20,3,1649,81407,17
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 74 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 74 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 74 transition count 91
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 64 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 64 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 64 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 62 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 62 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 61 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 61 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 61 transition count 71
Applied a total of 74 rules in 28 ms. Remains 61 /95 variables (removed 34) and now considering 71/132 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 95 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/95 places, 71/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 61/95 places, 71/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16689245423093452644.gal : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4157394789124852851.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16689245423093452644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4157394789124852851.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04391e+06,1.88219,59712,2,10404,5,228906,6,0,315,198972,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/66/70
(forward)formula 0,0,3.39498,77904,1,0,16,352385,19,2,1802,198972,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 74 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 74 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 74 transition count 91
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 82 rules in 26 ms. Remains 58 /95 variables (removed 37) and now considering 64/132 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 14 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/95 places, 64/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 58/95 places, 64/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2163000848821346244.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16183703343749118482.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2163000848821346244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16183703343749118482.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,571520,0.591802,25772,2,7636,5,77016,6,0,296,84162,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t40, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t5...286
(forward)formula 0,0,4.14022,118004,1,0,181,540387,149,80,2022,482128,201
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 81 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 81 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 81 transition count 104
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 77 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 77 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 77 transition count 98
Applied a total of 40 rules in 7 ms. Remains 77 /95 variables (removed 18) and now considering 98/132 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 77 cols
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/95 places, 98/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 77/95 places, 98/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9855069881684955003.gal : 9 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7009005950993452608.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9855069881684955003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7009005950993452608.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.34304e+06,2.85035,86132,2,12342,5,299275,6,0,406,312347,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(!(((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l338>=1))) + EF(((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l487>=1))))) U (!((E(((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1)) ...492
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,E(!(((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l338>=1))) + E(TRUE U ((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))||((s1>=1...796
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t11, t19, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t58, t59, t6...396
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8658230501376626341.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8658230501376626341.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8658230501376626341.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8658230501376626341.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8658230501376626341.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 62 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8275975322765041186.gal : 14 ms
[2022-06-09 11:35:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2401943966586348467.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8275975322765041186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2401943966586348467.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.34304e+06,2.21261,61000,1770,1033,74116,12308,274,189266,124,167331,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(!(((EX(((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(i8.u8.l338>=1))) + EF(((i4.u10.s6>=1)&&(i1.u1.l0>=1)))) + (((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(u6.l150>=1))||((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(u4...685
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,E(!(((EX(((i1.u1.s1>=1)&&(i8.u8.l338>=1))) + E(TRUE U ((i4.u10.s6>=1)&&(i1.u1.l0>=1)))) + (((i1...1051
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t9, t19, t32, t58, t62, t63, t64, t72, t73, t74, t75, t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, ...344
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,13.3717,315288,1,0,370992,68030,1284,1.48016e+06,718,909302,656869
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 75 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 75 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 75 transition count 94
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 68 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 66 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 66 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 65 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 64 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 64 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 64 transition count 75
Applied a total of 68 rules in 8 ms. Remains 64 /95 variables (removed 31) and now considering 75/132 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:00] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 64 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 42 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/95 places, 75/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 64/95 places, 75/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7194041687220978137.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14420851034487442527.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7194041687220978137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14420851034487442527.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.6756e+06,1.14947,38764,2,7067,5,143775,6,0,331,134370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AX(((s1<1)||(l504<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l504<1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t45, t48, t49, t50, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t6...311
(forward)formula 0,1,2.8728,73664,1,0,164,310515,173,66,2289,295546,171
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 77 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 77 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 77 transition count 94
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 71 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 71 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 71 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 69 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 69 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 68 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 68 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 67 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 67 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 67 transition count 79
Applied a total of 62 rules in 9 ms. Remains 67 /95 variables (removed 28) and now considering 79/132 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/95 places, 79/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/95 places, 79/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16724160826016283093.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1382217615490591532.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16724160826016283093.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1382217615490591532.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52297e+06,1.79307,57352,2,10446,5,221625,6,0,347,185825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EX(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1)))) U ((((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1)) + ((EF(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l123>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l32>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((((p30>=1)&&(l0>=1)) + ((E(TRUE U EG(((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1)))) * (s1>=1)) * (l123>=1))) + ((s1>=1...452
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t51, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t6...306
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,17.3733,450580,1,0,489,2.52773e+06,194,276,2458,2.29402e+06,504
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 77 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 77 transition count 102
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 70 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 70 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 70 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 68 transition count 89
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 66 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 66 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 65 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 65 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 65 transition count 83
Applied a total of 64 rules in 6 ms. Remains 65 /95 variables (removed 30) and now considering 83/132 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 65 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 65 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 65 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/95 places, 83/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 65/95 places, 83/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6855532222053506381.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12166351034256209174.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6855532222053506381.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12166351034256209174.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.77502e+06,1.7933,54944,2,9820,5,199242,6,0,343,193004,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l491>=1)))) + !((EX(((s1>=1)&&(l496>=1))) * A(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l337>=1)))))) U AF(AG(EF(AG(((s1>=1)&...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1)))))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(!(E...509
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t52, t54, t55, t56, t6...356
(forward)formula 0,0,24.0439,628080,1,0,473,3.43965e+06,207,216,2405,3.00099e+06,554
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 80 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 80 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 80 transition count 105
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 74 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 74 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 72 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 72 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 72 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 70 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 70 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 70 transition count 89
Applied a total of 54 rules in 3 ms. Remains 70 /95 variables (removed 25) and now considering 89/132 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 70 cols
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 47 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/95 places, 89/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 70/95 places, 89/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18370192992025675384.gal : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:36:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16137504644314705737.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18370192992025675384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16137504644314705737.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.21477e+06,1.98004,64536,2,10053,5,240970,6,0,369,209172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((EF(((p33<1)||(l0<1))) * E(!((!(((s7>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + AG(((s9>=1)&&(l152>=1))))) U EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1))))))) + AG(((AF(AX(((p30<...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((p33<1)||(l0<1))) * E(!((!(((s7>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((s...681
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t47, t48, t49, t55, t5...391
(forward)formula 0,0,21.9661,605608,1,0,385,3.07372e+06,217,164,2665,2.72913e+06,449
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 75 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 75 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 75 transition count 94
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 68 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 65 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 65 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 61 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 61 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 60 transition count 68
Applied a total of 78 rules in 19 ms. Remains 60 /95 variables (removed 35) and now considering 68/132 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/95 places, 68/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/95 places, 68/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11438779395061055854.gal : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5396985081921322122.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11438779395061055854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5396985081921322122.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,917228,0.595165,27268,2,7629,5,88184,6,0,308,90557,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((s1<1)||(l488<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((s1<1)||(l488<1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t41, t42, t43, t44, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t5...301
(forward)formula 0,1,2.31548,73844,1,0,140,303068,157,55,2107,262208,146
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 78 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 78 transition count 99
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 72 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 72 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 72 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 70 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 68 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 68 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 67 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 67 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 67 transition count 82
Applied a total of 59 rules in 4 ms. Remains 67 /95 variables (removed 28) and now considering 82/132 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 48 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/95 places, 82/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/95 places, 82/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8672757440738260314.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15440179043970371841.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8672757440738260314.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15440179043970371841.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.20051e+06,0.96248,36604,2,7017,5,129235,6,0,350,128100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E(AX(EG(((s2>=1)&&(l497>=1)))) U (A(((s1>=1)&&(l505>=1)) U ((s1<1)||(l488<1))) + ((p27>=1)&&(l0>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(EG(((s2>=1)&&(l497>=1)))))) U (!((E(!(((s1<1)||(l488<1))) U (!(((s1>=1)&&(l505>=1...250
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t49, t50, t51, t52, t55, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t6...326
(forward)formula 0,1,2.91075,86888,1,0,245,407099,200,105,2430,399734,277
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 81 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 81 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 81 transition count 106
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 76 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 76 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 76 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 75 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 75 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 75 transition count 97
Applied a total of 43 rules in 2 ms. Remains 75 /95 variables (removed 20) and now considering 97/132 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 75 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 75 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 75 cols
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 51 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/95 places, 97/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 75/95 places, 97/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6029618292828028574.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2699308801485918791.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6029618292828028574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2699308801485918791.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.94823e+06,3.43554,100496,2,12247,5,350392,6,0,397,361046,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((!(A(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l37>=1))) U (((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((p32>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) + !(((s1<1)||(l504<1)))) U ((AX(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1))...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),(!(!((E(!((((s1>=1)&&(l149>=1))||((p32>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) U (!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l37>=1)))))...815
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t19, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t55,...414
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph852784344481264749.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph852784344481264749.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph852784344481264749.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph852784344481264749.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph852784344481264749.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 83 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 43 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability877972790442147456.gal : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:37:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6587324977129333951.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability877972790442147456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6587324977129333951.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.94823e+06,4.93362,127664,2368,1108,99528,23787,294,733131,124,383563,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((!(A(AF(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l37>=1))) U (((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(u5.l149>=1))||((i4.u12.p32>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1))))) + !(((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i...336
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),(!(!((E(!((((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(u5.l149>=1))||((i4.u12.p32>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1)))) U (!(!(EG(!(...1099
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t7, t8, t9, t19, t25, t55, t56, t63, t64, t65, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t8...355
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 78 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 78 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 78 transition count 101
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 71 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 71 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 69 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 69 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 67 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 67 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 66 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 66 transition count 82
Applied a total of 63 rules in 10 ms. Remains 66 /95 variables (removed 29) and now considering 82/132 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 41 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/95 places, 82/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 66/95 places, 82/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3997921911147668472.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7517364020136234085.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3997921911147668472.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7517364020136234085.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.79441e+06,1.0722,44188,2,8035,5,145521,6,0,346,141999,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(A(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1)))) * AF(EX(((s1<1)||(l505<1))))) * EG((((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l336>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))) U (!(((s5>=1)&&(l0>=1))) * !(((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))))) + EG...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t48, t49, t50,...374
(forward)formula 0,0,4.34703,130492,1,0,234,581289,194,84,2461,569747,256
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 76 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 76 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 76 transition count 95
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 70 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 70 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 69 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 69 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 68 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 67 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 67 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 67 transition count 80
Applied a total of 61 rules in 3 ms. Remains 67 /95 variables (removed 28) and now considering 80/132 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 41 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/95 places, 80/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/95 places, 80/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3069771964317529266.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5893587815097310395.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3069771964317529266.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5893587815097310395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.12484e+06,1.44403,53496,2,10130,5,178873,6,0,348,196600,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((s1<1)||(l504<1))&&((p19<1)||(l126<1)))) * AX(!(E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l114>=1))) U (((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s0>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((s1<1)||(l504<1))&&((p19<1)||(l126<1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(EY(Init),!(((s1>=1)&&(l114>...215
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/79
(forward)formula 0,0,4.64898,126288,1,0,10,491954,16,1,715,503113,5
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 77 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 77 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 77 transition count 98
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 71 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 71 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 69 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 69 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 69 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 68 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 68 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 67 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 67 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 67 transition count 80
Applied a total of 62 rules in 18 ms. Remains 67 /95 variables (removed 28) and now considering 80/132 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/95 places, 80/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/95 places, 80/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8375253699800981143.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4148806302018591263.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8375253699800981143.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4148806302018591263.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.45404e+06,1.19454,46220,2,8781,5,153807,6,0,348,178217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(A((((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1))) U ((s1<1)||(l504<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((s1<1)||(l504<1))) U (!((((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l488>=1)))) * ...222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t46, t47, t48, t49, t52, t53, t54, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t6...331
(forward)formula 0,1,9.85512,281176,1,0,289,1.37298e+06,192,123,2426,1.4251e+06,324
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 79 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 79 transition count 105
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 72 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 72 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 72 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 70 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 70 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 68 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 67 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 67 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 67 transition count 86
Applied a total of 60 rules in 8 ms. Remains 67 /95 variables (removed 28) and now considering 86/132 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 41 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/95 places, 86/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/95 places, 86/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13073078270187181978.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability509197585220334531.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13073078270187181978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability509197585220334531.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5727e+06,1.20762,45672,2,9480,5,158038,6,0,354,148666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(E(E(((E(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l114>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))) + ((s2>=1)&&(l497>=1))) U (EX(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1))) + AG...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(E(((E(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l114>=1))) + ((s1>=1)&&(l33>=1))) + ((s2>=1)&&(l497>=1)))...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t48, t49, t50,...374
(forward)formula 0,1,9.86951,276692,1,0,446,1.14981e+06,214,248,2456,1.51125e+06,410
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 81 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 81 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 81 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 80 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 80 transition count 111
Applied a total of 31 rules in 5 ms. Remains 80 /95 variables (removed 15) and now considering 111/132 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 47 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 80 cols
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/95 places, 111/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 80/95 places, 111/132 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15743550569316217273.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7628153182341965403.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15743550569316217273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7628153182341965403.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07095e+07,5.79217,160984,2,10254,5,583055,6,0,431,442119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((AF(((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * ((l502>=1)&&(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1)))))) + E(((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1)) U A(E...582
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(!(((!(((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1))) * EX(!(((s1<1)||(l504<1))))) * !(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l334>=1))))))...1474
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t53, t54, t55,...456
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4761138821457440968.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4761138821457440968.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4761138821457440968.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4761138821457440968.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4761138821457440968.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 104 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 62 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13287109686045848107.gal : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9883063044000580320.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13287109686045848107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9883063044000580320.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07095e+07,18.9337,484632,2291,2068,371587,260354,324,3.08528e+06,141,2.47426e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((AF(((AF(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i4.u10.l335>=1))) * (i0.u0.s1>=1)) * ((i0.u0.l502>=1)&&(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i0.u0.l345>=1))||((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i...837
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(!(((!(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i4.u10.l335>=1))) * EX(!(((i0.u0.s1<1)||(i0.u0.l504<1))))) * !(EX(!...2013
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t24, t25, t28, t29, t30, t32, t33, t85, t86, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t93, t94, t...534
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3515872809695591628.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3515872809695591628.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3515872809695591628.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3515872809695591628.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3515872809695591628.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 139 redundant transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 95 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9540167687011539439.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18206028869289694073.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9540167687011539439.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18206028869289694073.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.56756e+07,110.162,2115412,5265,2899,1.33393e+06,759571,377,1.58635e+07,134,7.87234e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((!(A(AF(((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u1.l37>=1))) U (((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u4.l149>=1))||((i0.u11.p32>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1))))) + !(((i0.u0.s1<1)|...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),(!(!((E(!((((i0.u0.s1>=1)&&(i2.u4.l149>=1))||((i0.u11.p32>=1)&&(i0.u0.l0>=1)))) U (!(!(EG...1109
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t21, t26, t27, t29, t30, t31, t34, t71, t72, t73, t76, t77, t78, t82, t83, t84, t97, ...538
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,615.98,3691168,1,0,1.33393e+06,759571,939,4.30587e+07,449,7.87234e+06,1540293
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-06-09 12:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 12:01:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11869381811006085502.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 12:01:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16689675128318856887.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11869381811006085502.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16689675128318856887.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.56756e+07,19.3928,464332,2,24564,5,1.79661e+06,6,0,512,949504,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((AF(((AF(((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1))) * (s1>=1)) * ((l502>=1)&&(((s1>=1)&&(l345>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1)))))) + E(((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1)) U A(E...582
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(!(((!(((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1))) * EX(!(((s1<1)||(l504<1))))) * !(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l334>=1))))))...1474
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t19, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t54,...552
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,159.902,2213140,1,0,839,1.27776e+07,64,401,1855,9.18521e+06,760
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1737721 ms.

BK_STOP 1654776239704

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800154"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;