Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r312-tall-165472281800138.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800138
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 520K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Jun 7 17:12 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K Jun 7 17:12 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Jun 7 17:12 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K Jun 7 17:12 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Jun 6 15:23 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K Jun 6 15:23 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Jun 6 15:23 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Jun 6 15:23 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 6 12:11 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Jun 7 17:13 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K Jun 7 17:13 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K Jun 7 17:12 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Jun 6 15:23 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Jun 6 15:23 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 6 12:11 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K Jun 6 12:11 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1654774299746

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-06-09 11:31:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-06-09 11:31:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 96 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Transformed 553 places.
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 553 places and 150 transitions in 199 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 444 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 444 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 66 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 150/150 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 139
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 97 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 133
Applied a total of 30 rules in 22 ms. Remains 96 /109 variables (removed 13) and now considering 133/150 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 96 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 96 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 383 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 96 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 101 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/109 places, 133/150 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 96/109 places, 133/150 transitions.
Support contains 66 out of 96 places after structural reductions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2271 resets, run finished after 510 ms. (steps per millisecond=19 ) properties (out of 61) seen :19
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 48 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 105 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 58 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 90 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 114 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 155 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 122 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 20 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 102 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 42) seen :4
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 91 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 44 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 38) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 38) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 88 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 114 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 37) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 37 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 96 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:31:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:31:43] [INFO ] After 689ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :5 sat :0 real:32
[2022-06-09 11:31:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:31:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 1 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-06-09 11:31:44] [INFO ] After 377ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :32
[2022-06-09 11:31:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 61 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:44] [INFO ] After 493ms SMT Verify possible using 61 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :32
[2022-06-09 11:31:45] [INFO ] After 1075ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :32
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 469 ms.
[2022-06-09 11:31:45] [INFO ] After 2107ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :5 sat :32
Fused 37 Parikh solutions to 32 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 6 properties in 176 ms.
Support contains 33 out of 96 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 282 edges and 96 vertex of which 95 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 95 transition count 131
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 89 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 89 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 89 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 88 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 88 transition count 117
Applied a total of 20 rules in 27 ms. Remains 88 /96 variables (removed 8) and now considering 117/133 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 88/96 places, 117/133 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2261 resets, run finished after 342 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 41 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 26) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 26) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 106 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 47 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 45 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 99 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 95 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 86 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 100 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 52 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 49 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 107 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 110 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 93 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 39 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 43 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 24) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 63701 steps, run visited all 24 properties in 352 ms. (steps per millisecond=180 )
Probabilistic random walk after 63701 steps, saw 26654 distinct states, run finished after 353 ms. (steps per millisecond=180 ) properties seen :24
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-06-09 11:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-06-09 11:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 96 places (down from 58) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 78 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 78 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 78 transition count 101
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 72 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 72 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 72 transition count 93
Applied a total of 51 rules in 7 ms. Remains 72 /96 variables (removed 24) and now considering 93/133 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/96 places, 93/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 72/96 places, 93/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17179340208796037111.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8219581354863669542.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17179340208796037111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8219581354863669542.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,69015,0.345029,16940,2,4048,5,46307,6,0,381,35280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((AF(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))) * AG((((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))||((p34>=1)&&(l122>=1))))) * (EX(EG(((s1<1)||(l505<1)))) * ((s1<1)||(l504<1)...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))||((p3...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t56, t59, t60, t61, t6...371
(forward)formula 0,0,2.67008,85896,1,0,270,399225,220,110,2725,324675,314
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 80 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 80 transition count 103
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 74 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 74 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 74 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 72 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 72 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 72 transition count 91
Applied a total of 53 rules in 8 ms. Remains 72 /96 variables (removed 24) and now considering 91/133 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 72 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/96 places, 91/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 72/96 places, 91/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13530724285145067623.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1118820263319409351.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13530724285145067623.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1118820263319409351.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,58385,0.458635,21120,2,4886,5,67516,6,0,379,43105,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(AX(EX(((s1<1)||(l491<1)))))) + AG(!(E((A(((s1>=1)&&(l133>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l3>=1))) + EF(((p39>=1)&&(l137>=1)))) U AX(A(((s1>=1)&&...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!(EX(((s1<1)||(l491<1)))))))))),TRUE),(!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l3>=1))) U (!(((...404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t55,...389
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.40283,131020,1,0,465,681629,236,219,2689,545254,559
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 75 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 75 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 75 transition count 92
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 66 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 66 transition count 81
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 63 transition count 75
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 63 transition count 74
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 61 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 59 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 59 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 59 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 58 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 58 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 58 transition count 64
Applied a total of 84 rules in 20 ms. Remains 58 /96 variables (removed 38) and now considering 64/133 (removed 69) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 58 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/96 places, 64/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 58/96 places, 64/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2316 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 501 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=1666 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 529 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=88 )
Probabilistic random walk after 529 steps, saw 284 distinct states, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=88 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 76 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 76 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 76 transition count 95
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 68 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 68 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 68 transition count 85
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 65 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 65 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 65 transition count 78
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 63 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 63 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 61 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 61 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 61 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 60 transition count 68
Applied a total of 80 rules in 22 ms. Remains 60 /96 variables (removed 36) and now considering 68/133 (removed 65) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 60 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/96 places, 68/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/96 places, 68/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2289 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 489 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=833 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 2811 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=87 )
Probabilistic random walk after 2811 steps, saw 1325 distinct states, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=87 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 76 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 76 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 76 transition count 93
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 67 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 67 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 67 transition count 82
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 64 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 64 transition count 76
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 64 transition count 75
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 62 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 62 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 60 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 60 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 60 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 59 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 59 transition count 67
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 59 transition count 66
Applied a total of 81 rules in 16 ms. Remains 59 /96 variables (removed 37) and now considering 66/133 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 59 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 49 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/96 places, 66/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/96 places, 66/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9636053734434072970.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10302743702839229545.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9636053734434072970.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10302743702839229545.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20630,0.131963,10224,2,2998,5,20775,6,0,302,16591,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((p25>=1)&&(l0>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((p25>=1)&&(l0>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t41, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t5...291
(forward)formula 0,0,0.659857,27320,1,0,141,87328,156,56,2113,69580,155
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 78 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 78 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 78 transition count 101
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 71 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 71 transition count 94
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 68 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 68 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 68 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 67 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 67 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 66 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 66 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 66 transition count 83
Applied a total of 64 rules in 20 ms. Remains 66 /96 variables (removed 30) and now considering 83/133 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 66 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/96 places, 83/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 66/96 places, 83/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18056941509394754890.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17797257310520199287.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18056941509394754890.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17797257310520199287.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,35268,0.218633,13928,2,3707,5,34322,6,0,347,26222,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((EF((((s1<1)||(l149<1))||(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1))))) * (p17>=1)) * (l126>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((E(TRUE U (((s1<1)||(l149<1))||(((p23>=1)&&(l0>=1))||((s1>=1)&&(l353>=1))))) * (p17>=1)) * ...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t47, t48, t49, t55, t6...366
(forward)formula 0,1,1.73361,57088,1,0,370,228466,195,192,2423,217351,353
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 78 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 78 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 78 transition count 97
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 71 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 71 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 71 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 70 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 70 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 69 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 69 transition count 86
Applied a total of 57 rules in 13 ms. Remains 69 /96 variables (removed 27) and now considering 86/133 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 69 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 69 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 69 cols
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/96 places, 86/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 69/96 places, 86/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18376401702008589794.gal : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:31:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8837457019942135667.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18376401702008589794.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8837457019942135667.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,54882,0.29081,15468,2,4016,5,41912,6,0,362,32513,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E(AF(!(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1)))) U ((A(!(((s1<1)||(l488<1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))) * !(((p32>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + EF(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1)...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EG(!(!(((s1>=1)&&(l485>=1)))))) U ((!((E(!(((s1>=1)&&(l509>=1))) U (!(!(((s1<1)||(l488...294
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t52, t53, t54, t55, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t7...321
(forward)formula 0,1,3.19691,99592,1,0,374,499156,210,170,2555,384953,456
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 78 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 78 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 78 transition count 101
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 69 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 69 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 69 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 66 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 66 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 66 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 65 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 65 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 64 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 64 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 63 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 63 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 63 transition count 78
Applied a total of 71 rules in 12 ms. Remains 63 /96 variables (removed 33) and now considering 78/133 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/96 places, 78/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/96 places, 78/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5597035400968117652.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6436625313896066289.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5597035400968117652.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6436625313896066289.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,29633,0.110019,9624,2,2534,5,19124,6,0,330,13300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX((((s1<1)||(l33<1))||((s1<1)||(l123<1)))) * EF(((AF(((p30<1)||(l0<1))) * (((s1<1)||(l340<1))||((s1<1)||(l149<1)))) + EG(((s1<1)||(l...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!((((s1<1)||(l33<1))||((s1<1)||(l123<1)))))) * E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!(((p30<1)||(l0<1))))) * (((s1<1...228
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t45, t46, t47,...364
(forward)formula 0,1,1.87847,65584,1,0,381,290045,196,194,2284,297722,392
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 76 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 76 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 76 transition count 97
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 68 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 68 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 66 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 66 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 66 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 65 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 65 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 64 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 64 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 63 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 63 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 63 transition count 77
Applied a total of 72 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /96 variables (removed 33) and now considering 77/133 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 63 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 43 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/96 places, 77/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/96 places, 77/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16248232922005702300.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12877858914635646089.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16248232922005702300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12877858914635646089.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,29730,0.185738,12284,2,3513,5,27543,6,0,329,21972,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(E(AG(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))) U EX(EF(((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1)))))) U (A(((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1)) U ((p37>=1)&&(l122>=1))) + AG(AF((((s1>=1)&&(l...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l339>=1))))) U EX(E(TRUE U ((s1>=1)&&(l110>=1))))))))) * !(...482
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t48, t56, t57, t58, t5...341
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.17029,98472,1,0,383,475936,203,190,2339,411434,450
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 81 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 81 transition count 104
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 75 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 75 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 75 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 74 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 74 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 74 transition count 93
Applied a total of 47 rules in 8 ms. Remains 74 /96 variables (removed 22) and now considering 93/133 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 74 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 74 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 74 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 52 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/96 places, 93/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 74/96 places, 93/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7987892099234942244.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17133312845900200656.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7987892099234942244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17133312845900200656.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,78672,0.293666,15620,2,3457,5,42719,6,0,389,31764,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AG(AX(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1)))))) U !(EF(((((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l334>=1))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1))&&((s2>=1)&&(l497>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l...292
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(EG(((s1>=1)&&(l502>=1))))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U ((((!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l334>=1)))...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t49, t50, t52, t53, t54, t58, t59, t60, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t7...356
(forward)formula 0,1,3.35909,101604,1,0,494,478047,237,251,2735,464403,589
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 76 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 76 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 76 transition count 97
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 68 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 68 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 68 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 67 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 67 transition count 86
Applied a total of 61 rules in 9 ms. Remains 67 /96 variables (removed 29) and now considering 86/133 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 67 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/96 places, 86/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 67/96 places, 86/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability380342614562053842.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7177415258681763940.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability380342614562053842.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7177415258681763940.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,45240,0.294714,15856,2,4225,5,43859,6,0,354,33061,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((EX(AX(((s1<1)||(l339<1)))) + (EX(((s1<1)||(l509<1))) * EG(((s1<1)||(l510<1))))) + (((!(A(((s1>=1)&&(l91>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l335>=1)...279
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((((EX(!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l339<1)))))) + (EX(((s1<1)||(l509<1))) * EG(((s1<1)||(l510<1))))) + (((!(!...421
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1/0/85
(forward)formula 0,0,1.33853,44096,1,0,20,166239,20,4,1880,105644,16
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 79 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 79 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 79 transition count 96
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 72 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 72 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 72 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 71 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 71 transition count 87
Applied a total of 54 rules in 7 ms. Remains 71 /96 variables (removed 25) and now considering 87/133 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 71 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 71 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 71 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/96 places, 87/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 71/96 places, 87/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12156237949313767208.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13202043639617548673.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12156237949313767208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13202043639617548673.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,49688,0.286936,15624,2,3841,5,44972,6,0,371,29100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((AX(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))) + !(E(!(((p30<1)||(l0<1))) U ((p36>=1)&&(l137>=1))))) + (A(((p19>=1)&&(l126>=1)) U AG(((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((!(EX(!(((s1>=1)&&(l355>=1))))) + !(E(!(((p30<1)||(l0<1))) U ((p36>=1)&&(l137>=1))))) + (!((E(!(...346
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t54, t62, t63, t64, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t7...316
(forward)formula 0,1,2.9273,92248,1,0,342,418627,214,189,2633,355852,361
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 77 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 77 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 77 transition count 100
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 69 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 69 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 66 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 66 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 66 transition count 85
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 64 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 64 transition count 82
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 62 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 62 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 62 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 61 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 61 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 61 transition count 75
Applied a total of 76 rules in 16 ms. Remains 61 /96 variables (removed 35) and now considering 75/133 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 61 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/96 places, 75/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 61/96 places, 75/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10779863496874157148.gal : 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4599432621965666522.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10779863496874157148.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4599432621965666522.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23788,0.154487,10632,2,3013,5,24171,6,0,319,17879,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1)))) U !(((s1<1)||(l149<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(((s1>=1)&&(l354>=1))))))) * !(((s1<1)||(l149<1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t42, t43, t44, t50, t5...351
(forward)formula 0,1,1.95949,69256,1,0,347,291829,179,182,2164,292422,398
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 78 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 78 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 78 transition count 101
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 70 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 70 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 70 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 69 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 69 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 68 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 68 transition count 88
Applied a total of 60 rules in 13 ms. Remains 68 /96 variables (removed 28) and now considering 88/133 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 68 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 68 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 68 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 51 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/96 places, 88/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 68/96 places, 88/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13403723856923380618.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15166928601978676528.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13403723856923380618.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15166928601978676528.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,48084,0.25772,14704,2,3179,5,37097,6,0,360,26443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((((AX(((s1<1)||(l486<1))) + (((s1<1)||(l33<1))&&((s1<1)||(l150<1)))) * A(!(((s1<1)||(l510<1))) U ((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))) * (((s1<1...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((s1>=1)&&(l150>=1)))))))),!(((((!(EX(!(((s1<1)||(l486<1))))) +...372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t51, t52, t53,...369
(forward)formula 0,0,2.25572,73388,1,0,285,364757,214,117,2601,278492,331
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 79 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 79 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 79 transition count 100
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 73 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 73 transition count 94
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 70 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 70 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 70 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 69 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 69 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 68 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 68 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 68 transition count 83
Applied a total of 61 rules in 8 ms. Remains 68 /96 variables (removed 28) and now considering 83/133 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 68 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 68 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 68 cols
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 46 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/96 places, 83/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 68/96 places, 83/133 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability447086506853247554.gal : 1 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6986201845981861444.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability447086506853247554.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6986201845981861444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,46758,0.328885,16520,2,3744,5,48945,6,0,355,35029,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(((AX(((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1))) + EF(((p15>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1))&&(l353>=1)))) U (A(((s1>=1)&&(l123>=1)) U ((s1>=1)&&(l34...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((s6>=1)&&(l0>=1))))) + E(TRUE U ((p15>=1)&&(l0>=1)))) + (((s1>=1)&&(l484>=1))&&(l...501
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t5, t6, t9, t10, t28, t42, t43, t44, t51, t53, t54, t55, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t65, t6...336
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.4997,104628,1,0,339,516556,209,160,2592,427215,388
FORMULA DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-06-09 11:32:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-06-09 11:32:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 42968 ms.

BK_STOP 1654774344652

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r312-tall-165472281800138"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05.tgz
mv DBSingleClientW-PT-d0m05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;