About the Execution of ITS-Tools for UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 525.779 | 35886.00 | 67696.00 | 522.10 | FFFTFFTTFTFFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r276-smll-165307352800012.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r276-smll-165307352800012
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 268K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 29 18:02 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K Apr 29 18:02 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Apr 29 18:00 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 29 18:00 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K May 9 09:19 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 9 09:19 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 9 09:19 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 9 09:19 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 9 09:19 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 9 09:19 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 10 09:34 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1653116042834
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-21 06:54:05] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-21 06:54:05] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-21 06:54:05] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2022-05-21 06:54:06] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2022-05-21 06:54:06] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1181 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:06] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 72 PT places and 108.0 transition bindings in 41 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2022-05-21 06:54:06] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 18 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 3 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 9 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Finished random walk after 62 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 10 properties in 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 )
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
Domain [Cli(4), Z(2), Z(2)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 72 places and 108 transitions 340 arcs in 16 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Unfolded 12 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 59 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 37 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 338 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 378 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 59 out of 71 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Finished random walk after 123 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 12 properties in 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X((!F(G(p0)) U F(X(G((p0 U X(p1)))))))))'
Support contains 12 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 10 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:08] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 13 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:08] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 333 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:09] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 182 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 389 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s44 1) (GEQ s43 1) (GEQ s46 1) (GEQ s45 1)), p1:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8969 reset in 588 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8958 reset in 301 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), true, (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 410 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Finished random walk after 20 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), true, (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 666 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 73 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 66 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 16 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] Added : 10 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 84 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 12 out of 63 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 289 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 130 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), true, (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 518 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Finished random walk after 27 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), true, (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 679 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP to 3 states, 8 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 166 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 99 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 110 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 16 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:15] [INFO ] Added : 10 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 65 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8951 reset in 424 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 68579 steps with 6113 reset with depth 7 and stack size 7 in 383 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 finished in 7829 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X((X(X(p0))&&(F(p2)||p1)))))'
Support contains 12 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:16] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:16] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 188 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:16] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:16] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 114 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 278 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), true]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s15 1)), p2:(AND (LT s41 1) (LT s40 1) (LT s39 1) (LT s38 ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 14 steps with 2 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 finished in 643 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(!(!X((p0 U p1)) U (G((G(p2)&&p3))&&G(p1))))'
Support contains 16 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 63 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 62 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 62 transition count 68
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 58 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 58 transition count 64
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 54 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 54 transition count 56
Applied a total of 42 rules in 40 ms. Remains 54 /71 variables (removed 17) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 54 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 92 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 54/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(AND p3 p1 p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p3 p1 p2), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p3:(OR (GEQ s15 1) (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s14 1)), p1:(OR (GEQ s36 1) (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Initial state of product has no viable successors after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 finished in 418 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 11 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 43 transition count 56
Applied a total of 64 rules in 21 ms. Remains 43 /71 variables (removed 28) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 96 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s7 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s2 1) ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 475 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 150 steps with 0 reset with depth 151 and stack size 151 in 2 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 finished in 855 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 16 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 71 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 47 transition count 68
Applied a total of 48 rules in 12 ms. Remains 47 /71 variables (removed 24) and now considering 68/92 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 47 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:18] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [38]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 118 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/71 places, 68/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 46/71 places, 68/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s32 1) (GEQ s33 1) (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s36 1) (GEQ s37 1) (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s23 1) (GEQ s24 1) (GEQ s25 1) (GEQ s26 1) (GEQ s27 1) (GE...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13990 reset in 320 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 672 steps with 90 reset with depth 5 and stack size 5 in 3 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 finished in 579 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 8 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 47 transition count 68
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 45 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 41 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 41 transition count 44
Applied a total of 67 rules in 28 ms. Remains 41 /71 variables (removed 30) and now considering 44/92 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 06:54:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 72 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 41/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s15 1) (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s14 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11071 reset in 237 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11083 reset in 279 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 151 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 9 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 181 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 52 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 34 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 37 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 36/60/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Added : 24 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 75 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 8 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 66 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 41/41 places, 44/44 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 161 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 10 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 183 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 31 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 34 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 36/60/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:21] [INFO ] Added : 24 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 69 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11113 reset in 248 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11100 reset in 300 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13622940224727370920
[2022-05-21 06:54:22] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:22] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 06:54:22] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:22] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 06:54:22] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:22] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 06:54:22] [INFO ] Built C files in 23ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13622940224727370920
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13622940224727370920;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 495 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13622940224727370920;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 64 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13622940224727370920;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15609950117826375345.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 239 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 finished in 4274 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(F((X(p0)&&p1)))||F(p2))))'
Support contains 23 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:23] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:23] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:23] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 128 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p2:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s15 1) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s9 1) (GEQ s42 1)) (AND (GEQ s...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23609 reset in 506 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23650 reset in 533 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 410 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Finished random walk after 14 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 386 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:25] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 65 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 58 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Added : 62 causal constraints over 13 iterations in 159 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 61 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 36 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))
Support contains 23 out of 63 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 108 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 377 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Finished random walk after 14 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 375 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 55 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 70 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] Added : 62 causal constraints over 13 iterations in 220 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 57 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:28] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 33 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23641 reset in 213 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23662 reset in 255 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1613064992040568344
[2022-05-21 06:54:29] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1613064992040568344
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1613064992040568344;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 345 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1613064992040568344;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 42 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1613064992040568344;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16663826887144023563.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 187 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 finished in 7193 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 8 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 47 transition count 68
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 45 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 41 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 41 transition count 44
Applied a total of 67 rules in 20 ms. Remains 41 /71 variables (removed 30) and now considering 44/92 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:30] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:30] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 06:54:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:30] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 41/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s15 1) (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s14 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10912 reset in 231 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10927 reset in 256 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 151 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 10 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=10 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 190 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:31] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:31] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 29 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 28 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 36/60/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Added : 24 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 64 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 8 out of 41 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 41/41 places, 44/44 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 41 /41 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 81 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 41/41 places, 44/44 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 144 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 5 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 182 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 32 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 33 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 36/60/36 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Added : 24 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 65 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10930 reset in 249 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10892 reset in 257 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin8011334127408675042
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 44 transitions.
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 06:54:33] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin8011334127408675042
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8011334127408675042;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 259 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8011334127408675042;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 40 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin8011334127408675042;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased11655976026153155547.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 2753 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09 finished in 6641 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(G(p0))&&p1)))'
Support contains 19 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 59 transition count 80
Applied a total of 24 rules in 7 ms. Remains 59 /71 variables (removed 12) and now considering 80/92 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 59 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 59 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 59 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 74 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/71 places, 80/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 59/71 places, 80/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(OR (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s38 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s38 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s9 1) (GEQ s38 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s7 1) ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 379 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 402 steps with 0 reset with depth 403 and stack size 403 in 2 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 finished in 730 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(X(X(p0)))||(G(X(p1))&&G(p1))))'
Support contains 20 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-21 06:54:38] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 06:54:38] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 114 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 244 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (GEQ s41 1) (GEQ s40 1) (GEQ s39 1) (GEQ s38 1)) (OR (AND (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s49 1)) (AND (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s49 1)) (AND (GEQ s30 1) (GEQ s47 1))...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 332 reset in 154 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 341 steps with 0 reset with depth 342 and stack size 342 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15 finished in 770 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 33338 ms.
BK_STOP 1653116078720
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r276-smll-165307352800012"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;