fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
Execution of r258-tall-165303546000676
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for TriangularGrid-PT-3011

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
468.271 32329.00 54137.00 315.10 FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r258-tall-165303546000676.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is TriangularGrid-PT-3011, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r258-tall-165303546000676
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 288K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K Apr 29 11:35 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Apr 29 11:35 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Apr 29 11:34 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K Apr 29 11:34 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 9 09:16 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 9 09:16 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 9 09:16 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 9 09:16 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 9 09:16 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 09:16 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 70K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1653172289737

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-21 22:31:30] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-21 22:31:30] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Transformed 108 places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Transformed 90 transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 108 places and 90 transitions in 172 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 8 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 43 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 343 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 12 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 93 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Support contains 43 out of 108 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
Support contains 41 out of 108 places (down from 43) after GAL structural reductions.
Finished random walk after 97 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 24 properties in 33 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 )
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:32] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:32] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:32] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 160 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s23 1) (LT s67 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3600 reset in 541 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3598 reset in 541 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 15 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=7 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 129 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 39 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 40 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 73 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Added : 34 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 135 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 53 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 111 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 31 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 1 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 134 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 41 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 57 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:35] [INFO ] Added : 34 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 64 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 31 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3647 reset in 438 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3686 reset in 465 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin3100743751290072942
[2022-05-21 22:31:36] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 90 transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:31:36] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 22:31:36] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 90 transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:31:36] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 22:31:36] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 90 transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:31:36] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 22:31:36] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin3100743751290072942
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3100743751290072942;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 275 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3100743751290072942;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 33 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin3100743751290072942;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1726887198776955656.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 423 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-01 finished in 5063 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 104 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s32 1) (GEQ s81 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 17899 steps with 542 reset in 83 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-02 finished in 454 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((G(X(p0))&&G(p0)&&p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 55 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s2 1) (LT s56 1)), p1:(OR (LT s31 1) (LT s51 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 103 reset in 402 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10409 steps with 11 reset with depth 734 and stack size 734 in 59 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-03 finished in 816 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(G(G(X(X(G(p0))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:38] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:38] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:38] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:38] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 65 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (LT s32 1) (LT s85 1)) (OR (LT s11 1) (LT s61 1)))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 94 reset in 390 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 40969 steps with 46 reset with depth 840 and stack size 840 in 213 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-04 finished in 1013 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(X(X(G(p0))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:39] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:39] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:39] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 62 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s26 1) (LT s107 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 111 reset in 347 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 19046 steps with 20 reset with depth 877 and stack size 877 in 71 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-05 finished in 724 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((X((X(p0)&&G(p1)))||p2))&&F(p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 62 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 234 ms :[(NOT p2), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), true, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (GEQ s69 1) (GEQ s87 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s54 1) (GEQ s72 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s99 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 18 steps with 1 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-06 finished in 480 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((F((X(p1)&&p0))&&G(X(p2))) U (F(p1)&&p3))))'
Support contains 4 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 275 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=0, aps=[p3:(AND (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s53 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s53 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s33 1) (GEQ s46 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s53 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-07 finished in 523 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(G(X((F((F(p0) U p0)) U p1))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s15 1) (GEQ s100 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s29 1) (GEQ s79 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 466 steps with 0 reset in 7 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-09 finished in 369 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((G(F(F(p1)))&&p0))&&F(p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 180 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(OR (LT s27 1) (LT s42 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s30 1) (GEQ s44 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s77 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1996 reset in 474 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1938 reset in 510 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p2)), true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 281 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 3 AP to 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 73 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=10 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p2)), true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 441 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP to 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 47 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 44 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Added : 33 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 72 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 46 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 38 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Added : 35 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 61 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 6 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p2)), true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 340 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP to 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 99 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=33 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (NOT p2)), true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 353 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP to 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 45 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 43 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Added : 33 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 71 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 46 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 38 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 7 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:46] [INFO ] Added : 35 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 74 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2024 reset in 431 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2011 reset in 483 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 6 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:31:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:48] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:48] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 61 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2008 reset in 476 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1983 reset in 523 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin3822961444513567473
[2022-05-21 22:31:49] [INFO ] Built C files in 3ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin3822961444513567473
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3822961444513567473;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 165 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3822961444513567473;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 31 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin3822961444513567473;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2167002681705151327.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 582 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-10 finished in 8539 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(X(p0))||(p0 U (G(p2)&&p1)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:50] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:50] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:50] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 53 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p1) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s32 1) (GEQ s85 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s30 1) (GEQ s44 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s29 1) (GEQ s74 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3514 reset in 469 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3575 reset in 476 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (OR (AND (NOT p1) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 389 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 3 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 29 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=14 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (OR (AND (NOT p1) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) p0) (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 301 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 47 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 48 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Added : 32 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 73 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 67 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 30 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 92 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 49 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 45 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 46 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 63/63/63 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2022-05-21 22:31:53] [INFO ] Added : 32 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 65 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 88 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3582 reset in 429 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3531 reset in 460 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:31:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 54 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3553 reset in 494 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3463 reset in 529 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6517818472359319340
[2022-05-21 22:31:55] [INFO ] Built C files in 1ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6517818472359319340
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6517818472359319340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 161 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6517818472359319340;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 28 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6517818472359319340;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17483963619450375920.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 503 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-11 finished in 6589 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 49 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s57 1) (LT s75 1) (LT s55 1) (LT s73 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 271 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 273 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge :(X p0)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 80 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-13 finished in 924 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((F(p0)||p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:57] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:57] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:57] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 62 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s104 1)), p0:(OR (LT s30 1) (LT s50 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1186 reset in 436 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1140 reset in 482 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 167 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Finished random walk after 115 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 189 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 4 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 90/90 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:59] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:59] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 22:31:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-21 22:31:59] [INFO ] Computed 46 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 22:31:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 108/108 places, 90/90 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 374 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Finished random walk after 19 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=9 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 234 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 59 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1172 reset in 433 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1182 reset in 451 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2431920365379572558
[2022-05-21 22:32:01] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 90 transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:32:01] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 22:32:01] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 90 transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:32:01] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 22:32:01] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 90 transitions.
[2022-05-21 22:32:01] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-21 22:32:01] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2431920365379572558
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2431920365379572558;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 205 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2431920365379572558;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 30 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2431920365379572558;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5986829161608543249.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 192 ms.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property TriangularGrid-PT-3011-LTLFireability-14 finished in 4355 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 31146 ms.

BK_STOP 1653172322066

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TriangularGrid-PT-3011"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is TriangularGrid-PT-3011, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r258-tall-165303546000676"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TriangularGrid-PT-3011.tgz
mv TriangularGrid-PT-3011 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;