fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
Execution of r258-tall-165303545800484
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for TCPcondis-PT-30

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
1706.691 49478.00 139520.00 256.40 FFFFFFFFFFTFFFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r258-tall-165303545800484.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r258-tall-165303545800484
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 228K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Apr 29 12:56 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Apr 29 12:56 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K Apr 29 12:56 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K Apr 29 12:56 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 09:14 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 9 09:14 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 09:14 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 9 09:14 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 09:14 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 09:14 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1653144366704

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-21 14:46:07] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-21 14:46:07] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-21 14:46:07] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2022-05-21 14:46:07] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2022-05-21 14:46:07] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 65 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions in 163 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 28 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 58 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 28 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Finished random walk after 5775 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 23 properties in 47 ms. (steps per millisecond=122 )
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((G(p1) U p2)&&p0)))'
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 59 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 359 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND p2 p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}]], initial=4, aps=[p1:(GEQ s14 1), p0:(AND (OR (LT s6 1) (LT s20 1)) (OR (LT s10 1) (LT s28 1))), p2:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s20 1)))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00 finished in 603 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(F(p0)))&&((F(p1) U p2)||F(p3))))'
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 45 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 198 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (GEQ s11 1) (GEQ s27 1)), p3:(OR (LT s5 1) (LT s21 1)), p1:(GEQ s15 1), p0:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s17 1))], nbAcceptance=0, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1379 reset in 285 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1347 reset in 245 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p3 p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 329 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 4 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 249 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=249 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p3 p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 277 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Added : 23 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 62 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 85 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 82 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 683 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=341 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 85 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 105 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2022-05-21 14:46:12] [INFO ] Added : 23 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 31 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1392 reset in 194 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1372 reset in 294 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 30 transition count 32
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 29 transition count 29
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 10 rules in 14 ms. Remains 29 /30 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 29 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 29 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/30 places, 31/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 29/30 places, 31/32 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2021 reset in 194 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3741 steps with 77 reset with depth 42 and stack size 40 in 8 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02 finished in 4092 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 10 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 28 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s15 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1849 reset in 176 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 784 steps with 15 reset with depth 46 and stack size 46 in 1 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03 finished in 369 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(X(F(G(p0))))||X(p1)||p2))))'
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(GEQ s15 1), p1:(OR (LT s10 1) (LT s11 1) (LT s28 1)), p0:(OR (LT s4 1) (LT s18 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 217 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 354 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 p0), (X p2), true, (X (X p1)), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 172 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP to 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 1396 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=349 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 p0), (X p2), true, (X (X p1)), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 215 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP to 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 226 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:15] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 28 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 p0), (X p2), true, (X (X p1)), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 199 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP to 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 137 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 559 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 p0), (X p2), true, (X (X p1)), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 258 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP to 4 states, 6 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 124 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 245 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 27615 steps with 0 reset with depth 27616 and stack size 27616 in 78 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04 finished in 3273 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s10 1) (GEQ s24 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10684 reset in 127 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 8524 steps with 909 reset with depth 19 and stack size 19 in 11 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05 finished in 354 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(F(X(!(p0 U F((G(p1)||X(p0)))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 26
Applied a total of 10 rules in 8 ms. Remains 26 /30 variables (removed 4) and now considering 26/32 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 25 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 26/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(OR p0 p1), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s0 1), p1:(OR (GEQ s0 1) (AND (GEQ s8 1) (GEQ s19 1)))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 185 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3193 steps with 0 reset with depth 3194 and stack size 3194 in 6 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06 finished in 399 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(X(F((X(((p0 U X(p0)) U p1))||p2))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 59 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 34 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s17 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s17 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3721 reset in 147 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3324 steps with 119 reset with depth 26 and stack size 26 in 6 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07 finished in 347 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s13 1) (LT s25 1) (LT s26 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23691 reset in 67 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22939 reset in 109 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, true]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 105 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 63 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=63 )
Knowledge obtained : [p0, true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 116 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 39 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, true]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 77 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 63 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=63 )
Knowledge obtained : [p0, true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 104 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 137 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23550 reset in 86 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23829 reset in 78 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 30 transition count 32
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 28 transition count 28
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 28 /30 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
[2022-05-21 14:46:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 28 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 30 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24357 reset in 125 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24278 reset in 126 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin3969205957376067222
[2022-05-21 14:46:21] [INFO ] Built C files in 10ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin3969205957376067222
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3969205957376067222;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 184 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3969205957376067222;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 43 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin3969205957376067222;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased7468792670775113494.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 27 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin12943578370667382229
[2022-05-21 14:46:36] [INFO ] Built C files in 1ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin12943578370667382229
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12943578370667382229;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 94 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12943578370667382229;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 29 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin12943578370667382229;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased7335313744804173903.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 11129 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08 finished in 29158 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(X(!p0)) U (!F(X(p0))&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 26 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[p0, true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s19 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s17 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 29 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12 finished in 220 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p1)||p0) U G(X((p1 U X(p2))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 298 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s18 1) (AND (GEQ s12 1) (GEQ s26 1))), p1:(AND (GEQ s9 1) (GEQ s25 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s12 1) (GEQ s26 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6739 reset in 178 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6838 reset in 178 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 739 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP to 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 285 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Finished random walk after 1272 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 8 properties in 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=127 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F p2), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 886 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP to 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 248 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 338 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Added : 26 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 33 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 35 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 687 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP to 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 301 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Finished random walk after 1675 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 8 properties in 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=152 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F p2), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 940 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP to 7 states, 17 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 241 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 241 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 7 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2022-05-21 14:46:53] [INFO ] Added : 26 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 26 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 260 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6820 reset in 142 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6811 reset in 143 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, true, false, false, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 244 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 30 transition count 32
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 28 transition count 29
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 10 rules in 8 ms. Remains 28 /30 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
[2022-05-21 14:46:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 28 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 35 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6830 reset in 132 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6854 reset in 144 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4265307907805168057
[2022-05-21 14:46:55] [INFO ] Built C files in 8ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4265307907805168057
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4265307907805168057;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 110 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4265307907805168057;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 26 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4265307907805168057;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14456134250258479449.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 105 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13 finished in 7625 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U X((X(p1) U (X(p1)||p2)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 14:46:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 14:46:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 197 ms :[(NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 0}]], initial=2, aps=[p1:(GEQ s0 1), p0:(AND (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s20 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s19 1) (LT s14 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 61 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 70 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge :(X (X p1))
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 125 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 10 edges and 3 AP to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15 finished in 576 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 48208 ms.

BK_STOP 1653144416182

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-30"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r258-tall-165303545800484"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-30.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-30 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;