About the Execution of ITS-Tools for TCPcondis-PT-05
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 958.216 | 123242.00 | 131318.00 | 343.40 | TTTTTFTFFTFTTTTT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r258-tall-165303545700442.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is TCPcondis-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r258-tall-165303545700442
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 272K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K Apr 29 12:55 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K Apr 29 12:55 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K Apr 29 12:55 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K Apr 29 12:55 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 9 09:14 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 9 09:14 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 09:14 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 9 09:14 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 09:14 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 09:14 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 10 09:34 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1653136921695
Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-21 12:42:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-21 12:42:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-21 12:42:02] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2022-05-21 12:42:02] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2022-05-21 12:42:02] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 59 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions in 153 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 18 ms.
Support contains 30 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 57 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 30 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10002 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 220 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 56) seen :52
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 30 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 4) seen :3
Finished Best-First random walk after 224 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=224 )
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 33 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1068569809961526966.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1187310377549999905.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1068569809961526966.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1187310377549999905.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.479559,21760,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((((EF(!(((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT2>=1)))) + ((EG((CLOSEWAIT>=1)) * (FINACK>=1)) * (xCLOSING>=1))) + (EF((((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1))||((FINA...604
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,(((E(TRUE U !(((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT2>=1)))) + ((EG((CLOSEWAIT>=1)) * (FINACK>=1)) * (xCLOSING>=1...755
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,6.08447,166488,1,0,149,870848,116,87,1198,1.01328e+06,189
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 33 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12042785750099772531.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11459943821033270391.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12042785750099772531.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11459943821033270391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.473374,22016,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((FINACK>=1)&&(xLASTACK>=1)) + ((xCLOSED>=1) * ((EF((((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))&&((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1)))) + AG(((((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xF...711
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(Init,(((FINACK>=1)&&(xLASTACK>=1)) + ((xCLOSED>=1) * ((E(TRUE U (((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))&&((LISTE...2445
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,7.04904,207728,1,0,193,1.09918e+06,98,156,1158,1.34221e+06,262
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 31
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 29 transition count 29
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 29 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 28 transition count 28
Applied a total of 6 rules in 17 ms. Remains 28 /30 variables (removed 2) and now considering 28/32 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 28 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 28 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 28 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 37 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/30 places, 28/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 28/30 places, 28/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4042923766814493247.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3253320393191192934.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4042923766814493247.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3253320393191192934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52538e+06,0.5022,22480,2,7201,5,104928,6,0,143,98042,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG((CLOSED>=1)) + EF((((EG((xTIMEWAIT>=1)) * (((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))||(xCLOSEWAIT>=1))) * (xESTAB<1)) + E(((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xFIN>=...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !((CLOSED>=1)))) + E(TRUE U (((EG((xTIMEWAIT>=1)) * (((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))||(xCLOSEW...255
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t18, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,4.0895,126420,1,0,133,674005,94,79,1105,715401,173
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 13 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 35 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6161015729510511868.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9663308707112813366.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6161015729510511868.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9663308707112813366.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,352494,0.171636,11872,2,4589,5,42971,6,0,128,38900,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((EF(AG(((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT2>=1)))) + (xTIMEWAIT>=1))) U ((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT2>=1)))))) + (xTIMEWAIT>=1)))) * ((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSIN...172
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,2.01141,69604,1,0,111,358914,21,105,773,434049,163
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 39 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17412044266209700414.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5545278340856181522.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17412044266209700414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5545278340856181522.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.455762,21944,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((AX(((SYNRCVD<1)||(xSYNACK<1))) + EX(((FINACK<1)||(xLASTACK<1)))) + ((FIN<1)||(xFINWAIT2<1))) + (((CLOSEWAIT<1)||(SYNSENT<1)) + ((xS...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((!(EX(!(((SYNRCVD<1)||(xSYNACK<1))))) + EX(((FINACK<1)||(xLASTACK<1)))) + ((FIN<1)||(xFINWAIT2<1)))...263
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,6.09332,182680,1,0,170,987570,92,157,1137,1.22206e+06,202
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 34 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17826520098913872555.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4270945625973353867.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17826520098913872555.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4270945625973353867.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.476545,21992,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!((((((((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))||(CLOSEWAIT>=1))||((xESTAB>=1)||((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1))))&&(!((LASTACK>=1)&&(xFINACK>=1)))) * (E...393
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!((((SYN>=1)&&(SYNACK>=1))&&(xSYNSENT>=1))))) * !((EX(!((E(!((CLOSEWAIT>=1)) U (!(((SYN>=...963
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,22.3255,573324,1,0,166,3.19929e+06,116,105,1203,3.38184e+06,189
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5688335839237052811.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4207329238957895602.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5688335839237052811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4207329238957895602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.461966,21720,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((EX(((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1))) * (((ESTAB<1)||(CLOSING<1))||(xFINACK<1))) * ((xLISTEN>=1)||((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((EX(((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1))) * (((ESTAB<1)||(CLOSING<1))||(xFINACK<1))) * ((xLISTEN>=1...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,3.01431,87500,1,0,71,443392,91,42,1190,431985,93
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 28 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability480357158100070824.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:42:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18334181815098352526.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability480357158100070824.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18334181815098352526.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.456003,21932,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AG(!(E(((SYN>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1)) U ((CLOSING>=1)&&(xFINACK>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E(((SYN>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1)) U ((CLOSING>=1)&&(xFINACK>=1)))))))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,0,4.08369,129548,1,0,133,661106,89,78,1135,796070,171
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 30 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17466175403630575362.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5557623200790710805.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17466175403630575362.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5557623200790710805.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.461628,21804,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(AX(!((!(((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xFINACK>=1))) + A(((SYN>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1)) U ((FINACK>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1)))))) U (!(((((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1...527
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(!(EX(!(!((!(((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xFINACK>=1))) + !((E(!(((FINACK>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1))) U (!(((SYN>=1)&...779
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,0,2.16238,67712,1,0,64,340335,85,35,1137,311336,79
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2819508451607238731.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17784952294072981695.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2819508451607238731.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17784952294072981695.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.442936,21772,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((((((((xLISTEN>=1)&&(xTIMEWAIT>=1))&&((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1)))&&(xSYNACK>=1)) + EF((xCLOSED>=1))) * !(AX((xCLOSEWAIT>=1)))) * ((SYN...327
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(E(!((((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1))&&((FINACK>=1)&&(xLASTACK>=1)))) U ((!(E(TRUE U !(((FIN>=1)&&(x...722
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,2.52287,78852,1,0,76,400107,100,41,1175,383025,93
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 36 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14197305841154578741.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9105013149839413655.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14197305841154578741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9105013149839413655.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.446759,21712,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AG(EX((((CLOSEWAIT>=1)&&(SYNSENT>=1))&&(xSYN>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX((((CLOSEWAIT>=1)&&(SYNSENT>=1))&&(xSYN>=1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,0,1.88888,59616,1,0,66,299252,85,35,1136,265193,78
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 24 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4732522682130167278.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13424706687617491635.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4732522682130167278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13424706687617491635.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.455272,21968,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(((((FINWAIT2<1)||(xFIN<1)) + (AX(((CLOSING<1)||(xFINACK<1))) + ((((LASTACK<1)||(xFINACK<1))&&((FIN<1)||(xFINWAIT2<1)))&&(((SYNRCVD<1...636
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU(((EY(Init) * !((((FINWAIT2<1)||(xFIN<1)) + (!(EX(!(((CLOSING<1)||(xFINACK<1))))) + ((((LASTACK<1)||(x...1468
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,2.97459,96268,1,0,97,510130,126,58,1189,544081,117
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 25 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7066845773995023926.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6660227467881211632.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7066845773995023926.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6660227467881211632.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.440176,21924,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((TIMEWAIT>=1) U (AX((xCLOSED>=1)) * !(AF((AX(((FINACK>=1)&&(xLASTACK>=1))) + ((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xFINACK>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!((xCLOSED>=1)))) * !(!(EG(!((!(EX(!(((FINACK>=1)&&(xLASTACK>=1))))) + ((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(x...450
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6507538636039164755.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6507538636039164755.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6507538636039164755.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6507538636039164755.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6507538636039164755.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15615753776930282278.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17204770626143210914.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15615753776930282278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17204770626143210914.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.614776,29032,2635,517,43073,3960,147,120320,52,55506,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((u4.TIMEWAIT>=1) U (AX((u5.xCLOSED>=1)) * !(AF((AX(((i4.i1.u2.FINACK>=1)&&(i4.i1.u8.xLASTACK>=1))) + ((u4.FINWAIT1>=1)&&(u4.xFINACK>=1)...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!((u5.xCLOSED>=1)))) * !(!(EG(!((!(EX(!(((i4.i1.u2.FINACK>=1)&&(i4.i1.u8.xLASTACK>=1)))))...534
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,15.0021,371912,1,0,466094,26962,660,2.6096e+06,295,300585,492200
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Applied a total of 8 rules in 7 ms. Remains 26 /30 variables (removed 4) and now considering 28/32 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 28 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/30 places, 28/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 26/30 places, 28/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5721103860543606076.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4683541411118837791.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5721103860543606076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4683541411118837791.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,557019,0.254962,14460,2,5455,5,57461,6,0,135,52611,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(((SYNRCVD>=1)&&(xSYNACK>=1))) * ((((FINACK<1)||(xFINWAIT1<1)) + (EF((LISTEN<1)) + E(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1)) U (xCLOSED>=1)))) + (...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U ((SYNRCVD>=1)&&(xSYNACK>=1))) * ((((FINACK<1)||(xFINWAIT1<1)) + (E(TRUE U (LISTEN<1)) + E((...314
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/7/8
(forward)formula 0,1,1.00033,36348,1,0,12,163567,29,4,893,151244,19
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 18 rules in 4 ms. Remains 22 /30 variables (removed 8) and now considering 22/32 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 25 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1974895554575388576.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6388075270340506609.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1974895554575388576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6388075270340506609.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,71436,0.137687,10488,2,4389,5,35410,6,0,113,31862,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((FINACK<1)||(xFINWAIT1<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((FINACK<1)||(xFINWAIT1<1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 15/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.528482,23512,1,0,7,97295,19,1,712,81450,8
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8265982886415233967.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:43:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16515402951693123115.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8265982886415233967.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16515402951693123115.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.459857,21940,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((SYN>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1)) * AX((((FINACK>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1)) + (AG((((SYNSENT<1)||(xSYN<1))||(xSYNACK<1))) * EG(((CLOSING<1)||(xFINA...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((SYN>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1))) * !(EX(!((((FINACK>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1)) + (!(E(TRUE U !((((SYNSE...237
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,7.19684,198116,1,0,388,1.0991e+06,95,166,1152,1.14082e+06,500
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
[2022-05-21 12:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-21 12:44:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 122053 ms.
BK_STOP 1653137044937
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r258-tall-165303545700442"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-05.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;