fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
Execution of r222-tall-165286025600660
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldPPPt-PT-040A

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
621.283 57399.00 77487.00 977.50 FFTFFFFFFFFFFFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r222-tall-165286025600660.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-040A, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r222-tall-165286025600660
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 29 13:51 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K Apr 29 13:51 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Apr 29 13:45 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 29 13:45 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 08:55 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 9 08:55 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 9 08:56 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 08:56 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 08:56 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 08:56 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 268K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1653028230080

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 136 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Transformed 1003 places.
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Transformed 723 transitions.
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1003 places and 723 transitions in 266 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 54 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 106 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:31] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 760 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:32] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1011 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1801 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:33] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 11 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 526 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 1003 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-20 06:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 148 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 722 transitions.
Support contains 53 out of 1003 places (down from 54) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 608 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 30) seen :9
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 27 ms. (steps per millisecond=37 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 21) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 21 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:35] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 441 positive place invariants in 72 ms returned sat
[2022-05-20 06:30:36] [INFO ] After 1340ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:21
[2022-05-20 06:30:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 441 positive place invariants in 65 ms returned sat
[2022-05-20 06:30:39] [INFO ] After 2102ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :21
[2022-05-20 06:30:42] [INFO ] After 4392ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :21
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 2126 ms.
[2022-05-20 06:30:44] [INFO ] After 7441ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :21
Finished Parikh walk after 1354 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 21 properties in 67 ms. (steps per millisecond=20 )
Parikh walk visited 21 properties in 69 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:44] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 545 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:45] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1044 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1590 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:46] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:46] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 477 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 189 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s868 1) (EQ s875 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 310 reset in 776 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 35 steps with 0 reset with depth 36 and stack size 36 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-00 finished in 3111 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||(X(X(p1))&&X(F(p2))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:47] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 519 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:48] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 968 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1491 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:49] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 489 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 903 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s868 1) (EQ s875 1)), p2:(OR (EQ s204 0) (EQ s223 0)), p1:(AND (EQ s904 1) (EQ s923 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 288 reset in 737 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10 steps with 0 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-01 finished in 3680 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((F(X(p1))||X(p1)||p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 1001 transition count 720
Applied a total of 4 rules in 72 ms. Remains 1001 /1003 variables (removed 2) and now considering 720/722 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 720 rows 1001 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:51] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 552 ms returned [994]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 554 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1000/1003 places, 720/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 1000 transition count 718
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 998 transition count 718
Applied a total of 4 rules in 47 ms. Remains 998 /1000 variables (removed 2) and now considering 718/720 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 718 rows 998 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:52] [INFO ] Computed 440 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 532 ms returned [981, 985]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 533 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 996/1003 places, 718/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 994 transition count 716
Applied a total of 4 rules in 54 ms. Remains 994 /996 variables (removed 2) and now considering 716/718 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:52] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 542 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:53] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1061 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1605 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s251 1) (AND (EQ s515 1) (EQ s549 1))), p1:(EQ s924 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1146 reset in 650 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 35 steps with 0 reset with depth 36 and stack size 36 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-03 finished in 3621 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(F((G((G(p0)||p1))||F(G((G(p1)||p0))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 1002 transition count 721
Applied a total of 2 rules in 50 ms. Remains 1002 /1003 variables (removed 1) and now considering 721/722 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 721 rows 1002 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:55] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 543 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 721 rows 1002 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:55] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1053 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1599 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-20 06:30:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 721 rows 1002 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:56] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 455 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1002/1003 places, 721/722 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1002/1003 places, 721/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={1} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s738 1) (EQ s752 1)), p1:(EQ s994 1)], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 626 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-04 finished in 2867 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(X(p0))||X(p1)||(X(F((p1 U p3)))&&p2))))'
Support contains 5 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:58] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 553 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:58] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:30:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1052 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1606 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:30:59] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 460 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 492 ms :[true, (NOT p3), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=6 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 3}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=7 dest: 5}]], initial=6, aps=[p3:(AND (EQ s758 1) (EQ s775 1)), p0:(EQ s799 1), p1:(AND (EQ s15 1) (EQ s49 1)), p2:(AND (EQ s15 1) (EQ s49 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-05 finished in 2601 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 1001 transition count 720
Applied a total of 4 rules in 49 ms. Remains 1001 /1003 variables (removed 2) and now considering 720/722 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 720 rows 1001 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:00] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 537 ms returned [994]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 538 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1000/1003 places, 720/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 1000 transition count 718
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 998 transition count 718
Applied a total of 4 rules in 31 ms. Remains 998 /1000 variables (removed 2) and now considering 718/720 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 718 rows 998 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:01] [INFO ] Computed 440 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 496 ms returned [981, 985]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 497 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 996/1003 places, 718/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 994 transition count 716
Applied a total of 4 rules in 40 ms. Remains 994 /996 variables (removed 2) and now considering 716/718 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:01] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 528 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:02] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1032 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1562 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s940 1) (EQ s974 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 598 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 62 steps with 0 reset with depth 63 and stack size 63 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-06 finished in 3370 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(X(X((p0 U p1)))))&&X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:04] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 536 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:04] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 988 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1526 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:05] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 474 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 239 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 6}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 6}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 6}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 6}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=5, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s706 1) (EQ s721 1)), p1:(AND (EQ s436 1) (EQ s446 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-07 finished in 2285 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0) U G((X(p1)&&X(F(p0)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 1000 transition count 720
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 1000 transition count 718
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 998 transition count 718
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 997 transition count 717
Applied a total of 9 rules in 64 ms. Remains 997 /1003 variables (removed 6) and now considering 717/722 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 717 rows 997 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:06] [INFO ] Computed 440 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 470 ms returned [980, 984]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 472 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 995/1003 places, 717/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 993 transition count 715
Applied a total of 4 rules in 38 ms. Remains 993 /995 variables (removed 2) and now considering 715/717 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 715 rows 993 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:06] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 478 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 715 rows 993 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:07] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 907 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1387 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 993/1003 places, 715/722 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 993/1003 places, 715/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (EQ s616 1) (EQ s618 1)), p0:(EQ s446 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 577 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 25 steps with 0 reset with depth 26 and stack size 26 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-09 finished in 2639 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(!p0) U (p1 U p2))))'
Support contains 4 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:08] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 543 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:09] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 996 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1540 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:10] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 437 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, p0, (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(EQ s222 1), p0:(AND (EQ s533 1) (EQ s550 1)), p1:(EQ s970 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 592 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 819 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), true, (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 509 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 10 edges and 3 AP to 4 states, 7 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[p0, (OR (NOT p2) p0), (OR (NOT p2) p0), true]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 288 ms. (steps per millisecond=34 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 64 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 65 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 59 ms. (steps per millisecond=169 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 32211 steps, run visited all 3 properties in 462 ms. (steps per millisecond=69 )
Probabilistic random walk after 32211 steps, saw 31611 distinct states, run finished after 464 ms. (steps per millisecond=69 ) properties seen :3
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), true, (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 513 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 7 edges and 2 AP to 4 states, 7 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[p0, (OR (NOT p2) p0), (OR (NOT p2) p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[p0, (OR (NOT p2) p0), (OR (NOT p2) p0), true]
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:14] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 441 positive place invariants in 130 ms returned unsat
Proved EG (NOT p2)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), true, (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p0))), (G (NOT p2))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p2))
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 203 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 7 edges and 2 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-10 finished in 6869 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X((G(p0)&&G(F(p1))&&p2))))'
Support contains 6 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 23 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:15] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 510 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:16] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1036 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1547 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:17] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 483 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p0 p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s708 0) (EQ s725 0)), p2:(OR (EQ s542 0) (EQ s544 0)), p1:(AND (EQ s8 1) (EQ s25 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 583 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 29 steps with 0 reset with depth 30 and stack size 30 in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-11 finished in 2810 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((G(p0)||G(F(G(X(G(F(G(p1))))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 1001 transition count 720
Applied a total of 4 rules in 40 ms. Remains 1001 /1003 variables (removed 2) and now considering 720/722 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 720 rows 1001 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:18] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 512 ms returned [994]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 515 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1000/1003 places, 720/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 1000 transition count 718
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 998 transition count 718
Applied a total of 4 rules in 26 ms. Remains 998 /1000 variables (removed 2) and now considering 718/720 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 718 rows 998 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:19] [INFO ] Computed 440 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 533 ms returned [981, 985]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 534 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 996/1003 places, 718/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 994 transition count 716
Applied a total of 4 rules in 36 ms. Remains 994 /996 variables (removed 2) and now considering 716/718 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:19] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 521 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:20] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 989 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1515 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s237 1) (EQ s239 1)), p1:(AND (EQ s255 1) (EQ s272 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 575 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 38 steps with 0 reset with depth 39 and stack size 39 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-13 finished in 3341 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 1003 /1003 variables (removed 0) and now considering 722/722 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 540 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:22] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 991 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1533 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 722 rows 1003 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:23] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 448 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s931 0) (EQ s946 0))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 617 steps with 0 reset in 12 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-14 finished in 2116 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((F(((G((p1 U p2))||p1)&&p0))||p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 1003 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1003/1003 places, 722/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 1001 transition count 720
Applied a total of 4 rules in 37 ms. Remains 1001 /1003 variables (removed 2) and now considering 720/722 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 720 rows 1001 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:24] [INFO ] Computed 441 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 543 ms returned [994]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 544 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1000/1003 places, 720/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 1000 transition count 718
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 998 transition count 718
Applied a total of 4 rules in 22 ms. Remains 998 /1000 variables (removed 2) and now considering 718/720 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 718 rows 998 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:24] [INFO ] Computed 440 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 538 ms returned [981, 985]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 539 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 996/1003 places, 718/722 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 994 transition count 716
Applied a total of 4 rules in 31 ms. Remains 994 /996 variables (removed 2) and now considering 716/718 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:25] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 501 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 716 rows 994 cols
[2022-05-20 06:31:25] [INFO ] Computed 438 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-20 06:31:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 972 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1475 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 3 iterations. Remains : 994/1003 places, 716/722 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (EQ s203 1) (EQ s226 1)), p0:(AND (EQ s191 1) (EQ s202 1)), p1:(AND (EQ s343 1) (EQ s350 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 614 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 162 steps with 0 reset with depth 163 and stack size 163 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldPPPt-PT-040A-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3325 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 56170 ms.

BK_STOP 1653028287479

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-040A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-040A, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r222-tall-165286025600660"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-040A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-040A execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;