Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fko/mcc2022-input.r204-oct2-165281598900170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fko/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r204-oct2-165281598900170
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 440K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Apr 29 18:20 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K Apr 29 18:20 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Apr 29 18:19 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 29 18:19 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 9 08:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 08:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 9 08:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 08:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 9 08:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 08:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 215K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652947939766

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-19 08:12:20] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-19 08:12:20] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 219 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Transformed 320 places.
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Transformed 220 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 320 places and 220 transitions in 363 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 17 ms.
Support contains 176 out of 320 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 320/320 places, 220/220 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 29 ms. Remains 320 /320 variables (removed 0) and now considering 220/220 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 320 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Computed 210 place invariants in 35 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 365 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 34, 45, 56, 67, 100, 111, 112, 123, 134, 167, 189, 200, 211, 247, 248, 252, 253, 255, 257, 262, 266, 267, 268, 269, 272, 273, 274, 278, 280, 281, 282, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 291, 292, 294, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317]
Discarding 71 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 410 ms to find 71 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 249/320 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 243 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 243 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 243 transition count 208
Applied a total of 18 rules in 35 ms. Remains 243 /249 variables (removed 6) and now considering 208/220 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 243 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:21] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 16 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 243 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:22] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 381 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 243/320 places, 208/220 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 243/320 places, 208/220 transitions.
Support contains 176 out of 243 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-19 08:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 208 transitions.
Support contains 175 out of 243 places (down from 176) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 431 ms. (steps per millisecond=23 ) properties (out of 63) seen :60
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 33 ms. (steps per millisecond=303 ) properties (out of 3) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=312 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 243 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 139 positive place invariants in 22 ms returned sat
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] After 117ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:1
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 139 positive place invariants in 32 ms returned sat
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] After 79ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :0
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 208 transitions.
Support contains 173 out of 243 places (down from 174) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 23 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:23] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1617 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 37 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 1618 ms to find 37 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 203 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 203 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 203 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 6 ms. Remains 203 /204 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 203 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:25] [INFO ] Computed 102 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 713 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 203 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Computed 102 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 887 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 203/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 203/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5269656744342351616.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2195959081775722480.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5269656744342351616.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2195959081775722480.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16765892760963874429.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16765892760963874429.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16765892760963874429.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16765892760963874429.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16765892760963874429.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14941052373844786446.gal : 31 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6278801430255812252.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14941052373844786446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6278801430255812252.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.060853,6148,205,10,714,226,422,114,25,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((AX((u17.p145==0)) + (u81.p164==1)) + AF((((u23.p255==1)&&(u23.p45==1))&&((u99.p294==1)&&(u99.p84==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EX(!((u17.p145==0)))) + (u81.p164==1)) + !(EG(!((((u23.p255==1)&&(u23.p45==1)...204
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,0.15414,7172,1,0,1440,226,2280,628,92,132,13838
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 256 ms returned [1, 10, 134, 155, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 218, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 228, 229, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 278 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 211/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 210 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 210 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 210 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 4 ms. Remains 210 /211 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 210 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Computed 109 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 210 cols
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Computed 109 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 294 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 392 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 210/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 210/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8243787670432391573.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:12:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10321144958736228918.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8243787670432391573.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10321144958736228918.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:13:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:13:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16745631408333991093.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16745631408333991093.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16745631408333991093.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16745631408333991093.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16745631408333991093.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:13:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:13:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15640702526214128617.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14182433128152001896.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15640702526214128617.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14182433128152001896.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.075329,6268,205,10,714,226,425,114,28,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AX((A((((u1.p213==1)&&(u1.p3==1))||((u40.p18==1)&&(u40.p228==1))) U (((u13.p23==1)&&(u13.p233==1))&&((u26.p254==1)&&(u26.p44==1)))) * ...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(!(EX(!((!((E(!((((u13.p23==1)&&(u13.p233==1))&&((u26.p254==1)&&(u26.p44==1)))) U (!((((u1.p213==1)...557
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.156101,6768,1,0,1009,226,1963,223,102,132,12496
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 279 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 38 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 290 ms to find 38 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 203/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 202 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 202 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 202 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 5 ms. Remains 202 /203 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 202/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 202/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4387149571757827819.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5457543859252677890.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4387149571757827819.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5457543859252677890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10284674519124249455.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10284674519124249455.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10284674519124249455.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10284674519124249455.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10284674519124249455.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3159334836340310255.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8570785258281579414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3159334836340310255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8570785258281579414.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.059847,6116,205,10,662,226,422,114,25,135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(!(AG(((u1.p214==1)&&(u1.p4==1)))) U EF(AX((u63.p134==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((u63.p134==1))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((u63.p134==1)))))) U (...255
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,0.152021,7140,1,0,1076,226,2365,263,97,135,13276
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 155, 196, 197, 213, 215, 216, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 204 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 206 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 206 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 206 cols
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Computed 105 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 206 cols
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Computed 105 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 206/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 206/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1839701702545025564.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:13:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8038461587665958168.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1839701702545025564.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8038461587665958168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1218066950372841418.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1218066950372841418.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1218066950372841418.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1218066950372841418.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1218066950372841418.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12919088185642868216.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3162785110264702913.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12919088185642868216.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3162785110264702913.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.07077,6184,205,10,668,229,425,114,28,138,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!(A(!(((u69.p234==1)&&(u69.p24==1))) U (u87.p181==1)))) U !(E((AX(A((u88.p183==1) U ((u14.p251==1)&&(u14.p41==1)))) + E(AX(((u7.p242...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((u87.p181==1)) U (!(!(((u69.p234==1)&&(u69.p24==1)))) * !((u87.p181==1)))) + EG(!(...457
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,0.235152,7796,1,0,1802,229,2470,718,103,138,15970
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 9 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:14:29] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 36 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 200 ms to find 36 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 204 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 204 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 204 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /205 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 204 cols
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Computed 103 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 204 cols
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Computed 103 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 204/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 204/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17732688178681064857.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8592584184476972970.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17732688178681064857.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8592584184476972970.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph47505287484697917.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph47505287484697917.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph47505287484697917.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph47505287484697917.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph47505287484697917.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8170224417846664602.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7944264374824918077.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8170224417846664602.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7944264374824918077.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.060422,6200,205,10,659,226,422,114,25,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(E(AX(((u90.p198==1)||(u13.p136==1))) U (((EF(((u0.p213==1)&&(u0.p3==1))) + (u94.p204!=1)) + (((u27.p157==1)&&(u46.p191==1))||(u60.p1...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(((u90.p198==1)||(u13.p136==1))))) U (((E(TRUE U ((u0.p213==1)&&(u0.p3==1))) + (...355
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,0.167776,7480,1,0,1410,226,2292,903,93,132,13406
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 122 edges and 243 vertex of which 122 / 243 are part of one of the 61 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 61 places
Ensure Unique test removed 61 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 61 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 182 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 126 transition count 119
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 124 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 124 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 124 transition count 115
Applied a total of 91 rules in 19 ms. Remains 124 /243 variables (removed 119) and now considering 115/208 (removed 93) transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 27 transitions (discarded 88 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Computed 111 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [1, 122]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/243 places, 115/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 121 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 121 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 121 transition count 113
Applied a total of 3 rules in 11 ms. Remains 121 /122 variables (removed 1) and now considering 113/115 (removed 2) transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 88 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 121 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Computed 109 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 25 transitions (discarded 88 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 121 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Computed 109 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 121/243 places, 113/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 121/243 places, 113/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15139513881892077325.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4534247397113673720.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15139513881892077325.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4534247397113673720.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2049,0.06192,6844,2,2830,5,6540,6,0,511,4101,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AF((p208==1)) + ((p287==1)&&(p77==1))) + ((EF(((p282==1)&&(p72==1))) * ((AF((p117==1)) + (p259==0)) + (p49==0))) + (((E((p147==1) U ...309
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(EG(!((p208==1)))) + ((p287==1)&&(p77==1))))) * !((((E((p147==1) U ((p270==1)&&(p60==...659
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 111/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 111/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.501104,14824,1,0,28,21929,48,14,3516,15156,22
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 122 edges and 243 vertex of which 122 / 243 are part of one of the 61 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 61 places
Ensure Unique test removed 61 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 61 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 182 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 112 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 110 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 110 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 112 rules in 14 ms. Remains 110 /243 variables (removed 133) and now considering 108/208 (removed 100) transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 95 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 13 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Computed 104 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [1, 3]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/243 places, 108/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 107 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 107 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 107 transition count 106
Applied a total of 3 rules in 5 ms. Remains 107 /108 variables (removed 1) and now considering 106/108 (removed 2) transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 11 transitions (discarded 95 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Computed 102 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 11 transitions (discarded 95 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Computed 102 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 107/243 places, 106/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 107/243 places, 106/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2960816397294723100.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12467796186523945798.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2960816397294723100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12467796186523945798.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17,0.041436,5144,2,227,5,777,6,0,441,447,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((A(E((p205==1) U ((p272==1)&&(p62==1))) U EF(((p308==1)&&(p98==1)))) * (p127==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((p308==1)&&(p98==1)))) U (!(E((p205==1) U ((p272==1)&&(p62==1...268
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.301733,6612,1,0,8,1843,24,2,2765,839,10
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:01] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned [1, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 38 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 123 ms to find 38 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 203/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 202 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 202 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 202 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 5 ms. Remains 202 /203 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 202/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 202/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13321803644814283674.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16909232094795320218.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13321803644814283674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16909232094795320218.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5511881850606141797.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5511881850606141797.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5511881850606141797.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5511881850606141797.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5511881850606141797.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17808573804781723908.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3273573675131968130.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17808573804781723908.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3273573675131968130.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.089814,6292,205,10,661,226,422,114,25,135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF(EG(AX(((u5.p12==1)&&(u5.p222==1))))) * AF(EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!(((u5.p12==1)&&(u5.p222==1)))))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EX(TRUE)))] = ...161
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.209211,7260,1,0,1543,226,2503,623,100,135,13699
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 242 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 208, 211, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 38 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 244 ms to find 38 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 203/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 202 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 202 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 202 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 3 ms. Remains 202 /203 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2022-05-19 08:15:32] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 202/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 202/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11661409454611278306.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:15:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6216112701163086711.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11661409454611278306.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6216112701163086711.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4218120805460934235.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4218120805460934235.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4218120805460934235.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4218120805460934235.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4218120805460934235.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14584038465436990945.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17596359830032509721.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14584038465436990945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17596359830032509721.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.123801,6308,205,10,668,226,422,114,25,135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EF((u62.p144==1)) U AG(!(AF(AX((u34.p182==1)))))) * AX(EX(((u16.p245==0)||(u16.p35==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((u34.p182==1))))))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U (u62.p144==1)))),TRUE)...344
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.200281,7064,1,0,1542,226,1783,411,81,135,12965
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 36 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 156 ms to find 36 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 205 /205 variables (removed 0) and now considering 204/204 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 205/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17484574895430254499.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8337802792710664866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17484574895430254499.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8337802792710664866.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9370963715886665717.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9370963715886665717.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9370963715886665717.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9370963715886665717.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9370963715886665717.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 198 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3888953867911444359.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5223534681337628431.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3888953867911444359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5223534681337628431.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.127074,6388,255,11,760,228,431,119,28,136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(EX((((((((E((u75.p157==1) U ((u4.p12==1)&&(u4.p222==1))) + (u100.p110==0)) + ((u54.p212==0)||(u0.p213==0))) + (((u1.p214==0)||(u55....1807
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(EX((((((((E((u75.p157==1) U ((u4.p12==1)&&(u4.p222==1))) + (u100.p110==0)) + ((u54.p21...1861
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.230897,7940,1,0,2223,228,2756,1451,101,136,18722
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 124 edges and 243 vertex of which 124 / 243 are part of one of the 62 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 62 places
Ensure Unique test removed 62 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 62 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 181 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 107 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 105 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 105 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 105 transition count 105
Applied a total of 118 rules in 23 ms. Remains 105 /243 variables (removed 138) and now considering 105/208 (removed 103) transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 7 transitions (discarded 98 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 102 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/243 places, 105/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 103 transition count 103
Applied a total of 3 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 103/105 (removed 2) transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 5 transitions (discarded 98 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 5 transitions (discarded 98 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 101 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/243 places, 103/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/243 places, 103/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10264790715783351338.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11157245560260476079.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10264790715783351338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11157245560260476079.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3,0.038643,5196,2,206,5,719,6,0,419,410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((p293==0)||(p83==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p293==0)||(p83==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.174435,6068,1,0,5,940,15,0,2368,526,5
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 7 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 155, 196, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222, 224, 225, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 239, 240]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 195 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 207 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 207 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 207 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 19 ms. Remains 207 /208 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 207 cols
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 106 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 207 cols
[2022-05-19 08:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 106 place invariants in 17 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 207/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 207/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6973734732419161405.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13247740648604548266.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6973734732419161405.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13247740648604548266.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8996786132601717970.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8996786132601717970.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8996786132601717970.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8996786132601717970.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8996786132601717970.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6006367435939322490.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4625877215327845476.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6006367435939322490.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4625877215327845476.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.077128,6252,205,10,714,226,425,114,28,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(AF((E((((u99.p300==1)&&(u99.p90==1))||((u62.p234==1)&&(u62.p24==1))) U ((u2.p216==1)&&(u2.p6==1))) + !(((u98.p256==1)&&(u98.p46==1)))...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(EX(!(EG(((u4.p219==1)&&(u4.p9==1)))))))) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!(((u22.p259==1)&&(u22.p49==1)))...548
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,0.179273,8012,1,0,2371,226,2618,1645,110,132,16656
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 122 edges and 243 vertex of which 122 / 243 are part of one of the 61 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 61 places
Ensure Unique test removed 61 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 61 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 182 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 102 transition count 104
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 102 transition count 103
Applied a total of 125 rules in 17 ms. Remains 102 /243 variables (removed 141) and now considering 103/208 (removed 105) transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 5 transitions (discarded 98 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 102 cols
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Computed 100 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 5 transitions (discarded 98 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 102 cols
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Computed 100 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 5 transitions (discarded 98 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 102 cols
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Computed 100 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 65 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/243 places, 103/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 102/243 places, 103/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14789568007544452673.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17970038528585627119.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14789568007544452673.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17970038528585627119.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3,0.035887,5168,2,204,5,713,6,0,415,408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p319==1)||(p160==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p319==1)||(p160==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.169077,5992,1,0,6,935,14,0,2346,521,5
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 242 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 242 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 242 transition count 206
Applied a total of 3 rules in 5 ms. Remains 242 /243 variables (removed 1) and now considering 206/208 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 206 rows 242 cols
[2022-05-19 08:17:05] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 208, 212, 214, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 233, 235, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 246 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/243 places, 206/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 209 /209 variables (removed 0) and now considering 206/206 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 209/243 places, 206/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 206 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15091190484438527529.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8759939904532854297.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15091190484438527529.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8759939904532854297.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9235695467611320276.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9235695467611320276.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9235695467611320276.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9235695467611320276.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9235695467611320276.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 394 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7495624558564073112.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6770687237135805581.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7495624558564073112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6770687237135805581.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.126298,6500,258,13,830,230,437,125,28,143,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((((EF((u77.p166==1)) * (u32.p178==0)) * (u1.p320==0)) + EX(AX(AG((u69.p152==1)))))) * EG(((EF((u59.p132==0)) * ((u22.p161==0)||(((u3...406
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!((((E(TRUE U (u77.p166==1)) * (u32.p178==0)) * (u1.p320==0)) + EX(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((u69.p152==1...549
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,0.333832,9048,1,0,3625,230,3958,2819,124,143,22100
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 211 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 208, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240]
Discarding 39 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 222 ms to find 39 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 202/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 201 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 201 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 201 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 2 ms. Remains 201 /202 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 201 cols
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Computed 100 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 201 cols
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Computed 100 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 201/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 201/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17433157417089645582.gal : 19 ms
[2022-05-19 08:17:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9736784338641227510.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17433157417089645582.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9736784338641227510.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph772459364972961475.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph772459364972961475.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph772459364972961475.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph772459364972961475.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph772459364972961475.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16544716181618954128.gal : 13 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14696136510535660444.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16544716181618954128.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14696136510535660444.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.062454,6304,204,9,712,224,417,111,21,128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF((u88.p181==1)) + (u43.p116==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !((u43.p116==1))) * !(E(TRUE U (u88.p181==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.112891,6800,1,0,926,224,1935,218,72,128,12170
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 208/208 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 241 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 241 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 28 ms. Remains 241 /243 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Computed 139 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned [1, 10, 61, 72, 123, 134, 155, 196, 197, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 240]
Discarding 37 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 206 ms to find 37 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/243 places, 204/208 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 203 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 203 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 203 transition count 202
Applied a total of 3 rules in 3 ms. Remains 203 /204 variables (removed 1) and now considering 202/204 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 203 cols
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Computed 102 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 203 cols
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Computed 102 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 203/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 203/243 places, 202/208 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8034827425016861708.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4883361389865738548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8034827425016861708.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4883361389865738548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15560348975319172489.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15560348975319172489.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15560348975319172489.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15560348975319172489.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15560348975319172489.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4557505841483244060.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12970192926271755112.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4557505841483244060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12970192926271755112.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.061456,6368,205,10,648,226,422,114,25,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((AF(((u99.p308==1)&&(u99.p98==1))) * !(((AG((u37.p168==1)) + (u99.p208==1)) + (((u57.p197==1)&&(u0.p113==1))&&((u22.p241==1)&&(u22.p31...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * E((!(EG(!(((u99.p308==1)&&(u99.p98==1))))) * !(((!(E(TRUE U !((u37.p168==1)))) + (u99.p208==1)...308
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.112575,6748,1,0,875,226,1949,223,87,132,12024
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-19 08:18:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Total runtime 377342 ms.

BK_STOP 1652948318410

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r204-oct2-165281598900170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010.tgz
mv RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;