Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fko/mcc2022-input.r204-oct2-165281598800140.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fko/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r204-oct2-165281598800140
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.2M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K Apr 29 18:34 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Apr 29 18:34 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 29 18:25 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Apr 29 18:25 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 9 08:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 08:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 08:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 9 08:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 9 08:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 08:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 887K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652947780080

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 175 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Transformed 1030 places.
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Transformed 1020 transitions.
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 1030 places and 1020 transitions in 282 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 8 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 38 out of 1030 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 1030/1030 places, 1020/1020 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 117 ms. Remains 1030 /1030 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1020/1020 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1020 rows 1030 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:41] [INFO ] Computed 520 place invariants in 136 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1007 ms returned [1, 2, 13, 24, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 208, 209, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 498, 509, 520, 531, 542, 553, 564, 575, 586, 587, 598, 609, 620, 631, 642, 653, 664, 675, 686, 697, 698, 709, 720, 731, 742, 753, 764, 775, 786, 797, 808, 809, 820, 831, 842, 853, 864, 875, 886, 897, 908, 919, 920, 931, 942, 953, 964, 975, 986, 997, 1008, 1019]
Discarding 497 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 1040 ms to find 497 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 533/1030 places, 1020/1020 transitions.
Discarding 472 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 472 rule applications. Total rules 472 place count 61 transition count 548
Iterating global reduction 0 with 472 rules applied. Total rules applied 944 place count 61 transition count 548
Ensure Unique test removed 472 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 472 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 472 rules applied. Total rules applied 1416 place count 61 transition count 76
Applied a total of 1416 rules in 20 ms. Remains 61 /533 variables (removed 472) and now considering 76/1020 (removed 944) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 61 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 61 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 61/1030 places, 76/1020 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 61/1030 places, 76/1020 transitions.
Support contains 38 out of 61 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-19 08:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 329 ms. (steps per millisecond=30 ) properties (out of 27) seen :25
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=1111 ) properties (out of 2) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=1111 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 61 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] After 29ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 23 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] After 34ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :0
Fused 1 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 8 simplifications.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(!(p0 U ((G(p1) U G((p2 U p3)))||p4)))'
Support contains 14 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 48 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 48 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 48 transition count 50
Applied a total of 39 rules in 8 ms. Remains 48 /61 variables (removed 13) and now considering 50/76 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 48 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned [2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 27 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/61 places, 50/76 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 27 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 27 transition count 40
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 27 transition count 30
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 27 /37 variables (removed 10) and now considering 30/50 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 27 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 27 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 59 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/61 places, 30/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 27/61 places, 30/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 307 ms :[(OR p3 p4), true, p3, (AND p1 p3), (AND p1 p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p4)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p4, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p4) p2) (AND (NOT p4) p3)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p4) p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=p3, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p1 p3), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p1 p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p1 p3), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (EQ s2 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s22 1) (EQ s23 1)) (EQ s25 1)), p4:(EQ s...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true, true]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-01 finished in 465 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(X(F(G(X(p0)))))))'
Support contains 12 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 48 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 48 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 48 transition count 50
Applied a total of 39 rules in 7 ms. Remains 48 /61 variables (removed 13) and now considering 50/76 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 48 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/61 places, 50/76 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 24 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 24 transition count 38
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 24 transition count 26
Applied a total of 36 rules in 2 ms. Remains 24 /36 variables (removed 12) and now considering 26/50 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 24 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 24 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 50 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/61 places, 26/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 24/61 places, 26/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 31 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s23 0) (EQ s1 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s21 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 249 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 9 steps with 0 reset with depth 10 and stack size 10 in 0 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-02 finished in 388 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X(F(X(G(X((p0&&(X(p1)||G(p1))))))))))'
Support contains 12 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 48 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 48 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 48 transition count 50
Applied a total of 39 rules in 4 ms. Remains 48 /61 variables (removed 13) and now considering 50/76 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 48 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/61 places, 50/76 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 24 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 24 transition count 38
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 24 transition count 26
Applied a total of 36 rules in 2 ms. Remains 24 /36 variables (removed 12) and now considering 26/50 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 24 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 24 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/61 places, 26/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 24/61 places, 26/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s1 0) (EQ s12 0) (EQ s13 0) (EQ s14 0) (EQ s15 0) (EQ s16 0) (EQ s17 0) (EQ s18 0) (EQ s19 0) (EQ s20 0) (EQ s21 0)), p1:(EQ s23 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 152 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1 steps with 0 reset with depth 2 and stack size 2 in 0 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-03 finished in 288 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(X(p0))&&(F((X(p1)&&p2)) U X((G(p0)||p1)))))'
Support contains 13 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 48 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 48 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 48 transition count 50
Applied a total of 39 rules in 2 ms. Remains 48 /61 variables (removed 13) and now considering 50/76 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 48 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/61 places, 50/76 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 26 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 26 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 26 transition count 28
Applied a total of 33 rules in 0 ms. Remains 26 /37 variables (removed 11) and now considering 28/50 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 45 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 26/61 places, 28/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 26/61 places, 28/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 265 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=p2, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND p2 p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s2 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s22 1)), p2:(EQ s24 1), p1:(AND (...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11 reset in 135 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 9 steps with 0 reset with depth 10 and stack size 10 in 0 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-05 finished in 505 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 11 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 47 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 47 transition count 62
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 47 transition count 48
Applied a total of 42 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /61 variables (removed 14) and now considering 48/76 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 47 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 35 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/61 places, 48/76 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 23 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 23 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 23 transition count 24
Applied a total of 36 rules in 4 ms. Remains 23 /35 variables (removed 12) and now considering 24/48 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 23 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 23 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 23/61 places, 24/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 23/61 places, 24/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 28 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (EQ s1 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s21 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 126 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 5 steps with 0 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-09 finished in 263 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 48 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 48 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 48 transition count 50
Applied a total of 39 rules in 16 ms. Remains 48 /61 variables (removed 13) and now considering 50/76 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 48 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/61 places, 50/76 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 22 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 22 transition count 37
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 22 transition count 24
Applied a total of 39 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /35 variables (removed 13) and now considering 24/50 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/61 places, 24/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 22/61 places, 24/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}]], initial=3, aps=[p0:(EQ s21 0)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 47455 steps with 0 reset in 57 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-11 finished in 281 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!(p1 U p2)||p0))))'
Support contains 14 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 50 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 50 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 50 transition count 54
Applied a total of 33 rules in 7 ms. Remains 50 /61 variables (removed 11) and now considering 54/76 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 50 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 35 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/61 places, 54/76 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 26 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 26 transition count 42
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 26 transition count 30
Applied a total of 36 rules in 2 ms. Remains 26 /38 variables (removed 12) and now considering 30/54 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:46] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 52 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 26/61 places, 30/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 26/61 places, 30/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (EQ s22 1) (EQ s25 0)), p2:(EQ s23 1), p1:(AND (EQ s1 1) (EQ s12 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s19 1) (E...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 120 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 134 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 171 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 3 AP to 2 states, 4 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p2)]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 98 ms. (steps per millisecond=102 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 51 ms. (steps per millisecond=196 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Probably explored full state space saw : 1029 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 11279 steps, saw 1029 distinct states, run finished after 28 ms. (steps per millisecond=402 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 1029 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 11279 steps, saw 1029 distinct states, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=805 ) properties seen :0
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (G (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (G (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge :(G (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 148 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 3 AP to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-12 finished in 1051 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G((F(X((X(p0)||p1)))&&p2)))))'
Support contains 13 out of 61 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 61/61 places, 76/76 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 48 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 48 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 48 transition count 50
Applied a total of 39 rules in 3 ms. Remains 48 /61 variables (removed 13) and now considering 50/76 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 48 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:46] [INFO ] Computed 23 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/61 places, 50/76 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 26 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 26 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 26 transition count 28
Applied a total of 33 rules in 1 ms. Remains 26 /37 variables (removed 11) and now considering 28/50 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:47] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 26 cols
[2022-05-19 08:09:47] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-19 08:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 46 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 26/61 places, 28/76 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 26/61 places, 28/76 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(EQ s23 1), p1:(AND (EQ s1 1) (EQ s13 1) (EQ s14 1) (EQ s15 1) (EQ s16 1) (EQ s17 1) (EQ s18 1) (EQ s19 1) (EQ s20 1) (EQ s21 1) (EQ s22 1)), p0:(AND (...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500-LTLFireability-14 finished in 279 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 6084 ms.

BK_STOP 1652947787352

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r204-oct2-165281598800140"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500.tgz
mv RwMutex-PT-r0010w0500 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;