Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r168-tall-165277016600418.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is PhilosophersDyn-PT-10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r168-tall-165277016600418
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 4.7M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K Apr 30 07:53 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 182K Apr 30 07:53 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 318K Apr 30 07:51 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6M Apr 30 07:51 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 9 08:27 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 9 08:27 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 126K May 9 08:27 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 469K May 9 08:27 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 9 08:27 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 9 08:27 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8M May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652844039692

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-18 03:20:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-18 03:20:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 220 ms
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Transformed 170 places.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Transformed 2310 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 170 places and 2310 transitions in 354 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 75 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 45 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 45 transitions.
Support contains 170 out of 170 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 2265/2265 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 41 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2265/2265 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:20:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1905 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1905 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:20:42] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 75 ms
[2022-05-18 03:20:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 1146 ms found 380 transitions.
Found 380 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions removed 380 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 380 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:20:43] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 57 ms
[2022-05-18 03:20:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:20:43] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 50 ms
[2022-05-18 03:20:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:20:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 681 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 793 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/170 places, 1885/2265 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/2265 transitions.
Support contains 170 out of 170 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-18 03:20:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 463 ms
[2022-05-18 03:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 479 ms
[2022-05-18 03:20:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1191 resets, run finished after 1457 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 ) properties (out of 59) seen :40
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 10 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 461 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 166 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 19) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 19) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 18) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 6 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 17) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 7 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 8 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 16 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:20:53] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 45 ms
[2022-05-18 03:21:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:21:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:21:04] [INFO ] After 340ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:15
[2022-05-18 03:21:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:21:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:21:06] [INFO ] After 1688ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :6
[2022-05-18 03:21:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:21:10] [INFO ] After 4245ms SMT Verify possible using 1010 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :6
[2022-05-18 03:21:13] [INFO ] After 6850ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :6
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 7089 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:21:20] [INFO ] After 16026ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :10 sat :6
Fused 16 Parikh solutions to 6 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 201 ms.
Support contains 160 out of 170 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 208 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:21:20] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 46 ms
[2022-05-18 03:21:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 805 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1198 resets, run finished after 1390 ms. (steps per millisecond=7 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Interrupted Best-First random walk after 9752 steps, including 62 resets, run timeout after 5006 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 ) properties seen 0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 81 resets, run finished after 1660 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 83 resets, run finished after 128 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 75 resets, run finished after 127 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 86 resets, run finished after 101 ms. (steps per millisecond=99 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 81 resets, run finished after 119 ms. (steps per millisecond=84 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 509043 steps, run timeout after 24001 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 ) properties seen :{}
Probabilistic random walk after 509043 steps, saw 125705 distinct states, run finished after 24004 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 ) properties seen :0
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:21:53] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:02] [INFO ] After 234ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:6
[2022-05-18 03:22:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:05] [INFO ] After 1964ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2022-05-18 03:22:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:22:10] [INFO ] After 5285ms SMT Verify possible using 1010 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2022-05-18 03:22:27] [INFO ] After 22794ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 2 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:22:27] [INFO ] After 25024ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 193 ms.
Support contains 160 out of 170 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 119 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 145 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:22:28] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 40 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:22:28] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 37 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 990 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1094 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 03:22:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 137 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:22:29] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 38 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 715 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 47 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:22:30] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:39] [INFO ] After 239ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:6
[2022-05-18 03:22:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 03:22:41] [INFO ] After 1834ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2022-05-18 03:22:42] [INFO ] After 3373ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 1179 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:22:43] [INFO ] After 4812ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2022-05-18 03:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 128 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 122 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12250712244320998400.gal : 25 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16706488245522790193.prop : 25 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /tmp/redAtoms9854879984946642994;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12250712244320998400.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16706488245522790193.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp...321
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16706488245522790193.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :10 after 19
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :19 after 65
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :65 after 91
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :91 after 326
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :326 after 570
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :570 after 871
SDD proceeding with computation,6 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :871 after 3681
Reachability property AtomicPropp20 is true.
Reachability property AtomicPropp16 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :3681 after 18285
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :18285 after 21987
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :21987 after 120645
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :120645 after 759293
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :759293 after 975216
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:22:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 94 ms
[2022-05-18 03:22:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:22:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 93 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9837778728878370705.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9837778728878370705.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9837778728878370705.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9837778728878370705.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9837778728878370705.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:22:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:22:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:23:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2767 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:23:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 491 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 22 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:23:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18307429732498573117.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3524879402306427825.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /tmp/redAtoms9854879984946642994;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18307429732498573117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3524879402306427825.prop' '--nowitness'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp...299
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3524879402306427825.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 59
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :59 after 1283
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :1283 after 21882
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :21882 after 48365
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :48365 after 1.99621e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,4 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1.99621e+06 after 1.32173e+08
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin8973731676551992272
[2022-05-18 03:23:15] [INFO ] Built C files in 57ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin8973731676551992272
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8973731676551992272;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread failed on error :java.lang.RuntimeException: Compilation or link of executable timed out.java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Subprocess running cd /tmp/ltsmin8973731676551992272;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c' killed by timeout after 3 SECONDS
java.lang.RuntimeException: Compilation or link of executable timed out.java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Subprocess running cd /tmp/ltsmin8973731676551992272;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c' killed by timeout after 3 SECONDS
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner$1.run(LTSminRunner.java:94)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Successfully simplified 10 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-18 03:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 462 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 468 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 206 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:23:25] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 37 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 740 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:23:26] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 35 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:23:26] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:23:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2697 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2884 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 03:23:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 110 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:23:29] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 38 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 724 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 92 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 115 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 133 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7364784220074943233.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 03:23:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13134689580107726806.ctl : 13 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7364784220074943233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13134689580107726806.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 121 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:24:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 123 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3739640193529372841.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3739640193529372841.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3739640193529372841.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3739640193529372841.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3739640193529372841.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:24:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:24:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:24:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 750 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:24:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7181927945924651477.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9527299233824668831.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7181927945924651477.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9527299233824668831.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,10.2761,213716,7700,3156,181355,15073,5201,95321,1306,111960,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((((((((((((((u9.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u9.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u9.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u6.Forks_7>=1)&&(u6.Thi...96330
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((((((((((((((u9.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u9.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u9.Fork...96181
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 289 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:24:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 38 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 691 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:24:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:24:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:24:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1399 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1507 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 03:24:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 49 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:24:35] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 672 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 111 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 143 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 152 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 129 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10360693454232337382.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 03:24:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6994294505883204067.ctl : 12 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10360693454232337382.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6994294505883204067.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:25:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 132 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:25:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 139 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12303195745056492354.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12303195745056492354.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12303195745056492354.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12303195745056492354.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12303195745056492354.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:25:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:25:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:25:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3116 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:25:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 385 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:25:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3454219316962886535.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8781140601579977123.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3454219316962886535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8781140601579977123.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,10.2537,212648,8070,870,175008,2456,5890,102595,710,16367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((((((((((E(AF(EG((((((i8.u16.Think_9>=1)||(i9.u18.Think_1>=1))||((i6.u17.Think_2>=1)||(i5.u10.Think_5>=1)))||(((i2.u5.Think_3>=1)||(i...219154
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((((((((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((((((((((i0.u1.Neighbourhood_3_8>=1)&&(i0.u1.Forks_8>=1))&&((i2.u5.Forks...219117
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 124 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:25:38] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 655 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:25:39] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 37 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:25:39] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:25:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 561 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 658 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 03:25:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:25:40] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 647 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:25:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 106 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 136 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 135 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14098174090676871741.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-18 03:25:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8229890125744290385.ctl : 18 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14098174090676871741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8229890125744290385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 152 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 127 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16223399289301168722.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16223399289301168722.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16223399289301168722.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16223399289301168722.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16223399289301168722.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:26:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:26:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:26:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 403 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6511923841571115413.gal : 18 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10942753896465504917.ctl : 18 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6511923841571115413.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10942753896465504917.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,24.0543,507856,7990,8460,372776,48969,6313,793140,1628,2.27652e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((i8.u3.Neighbourhood_9_4>=1)&&(i0.u10.WaitRight_9>=1))&&(i8.u3.Forks_4>=1))||(((i1.u2.WaitRight_5>=1)&&(i9....225179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((i8.u3.Neighbourhood_9_4>=1)&&(i0.u10.WaitRight_9>=1))...221284
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:26:42] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 628 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:26:43] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:26:43] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 923 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1025 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:26:44] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 982 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 144 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:26:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 142 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 137 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7865970597640743968.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:26:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability829473220909045993.ctl : 21 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7865970597640743968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability829473220909045993.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 137 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 137 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8495555493545961010.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8495555493545961010.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8495555493545961010.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8495555493545961010.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8495555493545961010.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:27:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:27:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:27:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:27:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 431 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:27:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7899869845281240334.gal : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10468015505337116071.ctl : 34 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7899869845281240334.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10468015505337116071.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,9.21828,228048,7673,3092,187841,14351,5220,100132,1324,105823,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((EG(((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u4.Forks_7>=1)&&(u4.T...297172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!((((((((EG(E((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=...517931
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 198 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:27:48] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 835 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:27:49] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 343 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:27:49] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 32 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6969 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7316 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 03:27:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 56 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 675 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 81 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10872458319716304985.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:27:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12957440315982817075.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10872458319716304985.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12957440315982817075.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2022-05-18 03:28:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11494896473867275471.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11494896473867275471.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11494896473867275471.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11494896473867275471.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11494896473867275471.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:28:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:28:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:28:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:28:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 380 ms
[2022-05-18 03:28:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:28:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16855004085037816553.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 03:28:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17476954527524471393.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16855004085037816553.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17476954527524471393.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.76277,228128,7674,2978,188060,13952,5222,97351,1327,99611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:28:58] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:28:59] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 652 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:28:59] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:28:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:28:59] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:28:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:29:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1399 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1541 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:29:00] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 645 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:29:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 99 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 122 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 122 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3808218648795916352.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6020640600740317149.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3808218648795916352.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6020640600740317149.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 121 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:29:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 120 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11885913863305381569.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11885913863305381569.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11885913863305381569.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11885913863305381569.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11885913863305381569.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:29:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:29:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:29:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 434 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11778514087267538459.gal : 17 ms
[2022-05-18 03:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8584194300484195604.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11778514087267538459.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8584194300484195604.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,10.4202,233944,7667,3045,189275,15118,5215,102842,1320,108283,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((((((((((((((u3.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u3.Think_2>=1))&&((u7.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u3.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u8.Forks_7>=1)&&(u8.Think_...214358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((((((((((((u3.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u3.Think_2>=1))&&((u7.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u3.Forks_2>=...404137
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:30:03] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:04] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 661 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:30:04] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 35 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:30:04] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:30:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 505 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 588 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:30:04] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 665 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:30:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 125 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 186 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 175 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 166 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9405553747986076533.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10801870103407894730.ctl : 25 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9405553747986076533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10801870103407894730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 166 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 165 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5185259713101077158.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5185259713101077158.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5185259713101077158.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5185259713101077158.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5185259713101077158.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 453 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5514961585179004696.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 03:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10331534767006265342.ctl : 28 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5514961585179004696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10331534767006265342.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.67308,222760,7682,3121,182927,14707,5222,98097,1327,109563,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((!(A(((((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u3.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u5.Forks_7>=1)&&(u...495873
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((E((((((u7.Think_9>=1)||(u9.Think_1>=1))||((u8.Think_2>=1)||(u4.Think_5>=1)))||(((u2.Thi...1826558
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:31:08] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 37 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 667 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:31:08] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:31:08] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 33 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:31:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 959 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1040 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:31:09] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 38 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 672 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 111 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 154 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:31:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 131 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 132 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4298719818009553895.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11387099223226016146.ctl : 15 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4298719818009553895.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11387099223226016146.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 131 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 134 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2333184601398844327.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2333184601398844327.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2333184601398844327.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2333184601398844327.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2333184601398844327.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:31:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:31:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:31:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2750 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 383 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12500747969321254365.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-18 03:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12750665300707981236.ctl : 20 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12500747969321254365.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12750665300707981236.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.41913,217996,8069,1100,175787,3534,5839,104232,852,22592,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(A(EG((((((((((((i8.u14.Neighbourhood_1_9>=1)&&(i5.u1.HasLeft_1>=1))&&(i5.u9.HasRight_1>=1))||(((i7.u7.HasRight_10>=1)&&(i4.u8.Neighb...319907
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!((E(!((((((((((((((i7.u13.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(i1.u15.Think_2>=1))&&((i1.u15.Neighbourhood...536156
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 346 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:32:13] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 660 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:32:13] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 371 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:32:14] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:32:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6929 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7300 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 03:32:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:32:21] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 99 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 674 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:32:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:32:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 91 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3021908051603871468.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1076985807615111036.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3021908051603871468.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1076985807615111036.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:32:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:32:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4799213632914321979.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4799213632914321979.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4799213632914321979.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4799213632914321979.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4799213632914321979.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:32:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:32:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:32:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3026 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 327 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1352773166082740900.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13383542945741866309.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1352773166082740900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13383542945741866309.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.66221,222804,7789,2979,184109,14720,5400,104514,1292,102534,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((((u9.Neighbourhood_8_9<1)||(u9.Think_8<1))||((u9.Forks_8<1)||(u0.Neighbourhood_10_8<1)))||((((u2.Neighbourhood_4_10<1)||(u2.HasRi...271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((((u9.Neighbourhood_8_9<1)||(u9.Think_8<1))||((u9.Forks_8<1)||(u0.Neighbourhood_10_8<1)))||...320
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t4, t13, t15, t18, t22, t26, t28, t33, t41, t45, t46, t47, t48, t50, t54, t59, t60, t...5362
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:33:23] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 653 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:33:23] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:33:24] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:33:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6309 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 6583 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:33:30] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 670 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1790252654156541715.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:33:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2828214285098651757.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1790252654156541715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2828214285098651757.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:34:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:34:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13507852316513562059.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13507852316513562059.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13507852316513562059.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13507852316513562059.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13507852316513562059.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:34:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:34:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:34:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2760 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 312 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:34:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14457097246604891792.gal : 13 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1147606686448983973.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14457097246604891792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1147606686448983973.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,10.0053,219108,7993,1044,177265,2677,5841,98654,829,16049,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:34:32] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 37 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 663 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:34:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 364 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:34:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 33 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 7070 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:34:40] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 600 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 80 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 80 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13869600136688145193.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:34:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14727390262768502201.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13869600136688145193.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14727390262768502201.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11562084721089036052.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11562084721089036052.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11562084721089036052.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11562084721089036052.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11562084721089036052.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:35:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:35:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:35:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:35:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 327 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:35:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13968527946470859468.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15401439848097146306.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13968527946470859468.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15401439848097146306.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,9.48568,225276,7674,2978,186197,14077,5219,96828,1325,101527,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 124 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:35:42] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 654 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:35:43] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 372 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:35:43] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:35:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6875 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7249 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 03:35:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:35:50] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 679 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14698559659781739964.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 03:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10501504173249352474.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14698559659781739964.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10501504173249352474.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13790765857224953906.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13790765857224953906.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13790765857224953906.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13790765857224953906.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13790765857224953906.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 354 ms
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6583737587255635616.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 03:36:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11267907945087529892.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6583737587255635616.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11267907945087529892.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,9.67999,222280,7663,2993,185849,14478,5204,98165,1309,100921,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:36:52] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 35 ms
[2022-05-18 03:36:53] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 622 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:36:53] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:36:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 297 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:36:53] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 34 ms
[2022-05-18 03:36:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:36:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 6461 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:36:59] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 38 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:00] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 673 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability785418090239199112.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9035600298258309209.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability785418090239199112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9035600298258309209.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph560180052505143002.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph560180052505143002.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph560180052505143002.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph560180052505143002.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph560180052505143002.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3026 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 319 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17016251349430222205.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 03:37:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4294551252291028901.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17016251349430222205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4294551252291028901.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,9.91429,224924,7786,2991,186410,14509,5464,102192,1297,112070,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:38:01] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:02] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 609 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:38:02] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 334 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:38:02] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 03:38:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6869 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 03:38:09] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 33 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 617 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 89 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17300163116146816401.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13594736768391032498.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17300163116146816401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13594736768391032498.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 91 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6521039447027532288.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6521039447027532288.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6521039447027532288.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6521039447027532288.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6521039447027532288.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 331 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3292507609942850460.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:38:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5988023159105611313.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3292507609942850460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5988023159105611313.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,9.77048,218556,7695,3163,181189,15128,5222,96481,1328,115199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 03:39:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 405 ms
[2022-05-18 03:39:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 389 ms
[2022-05-18 03:39:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 03:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 393 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph152195949761207918.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph152195949761207918.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph152195949761207918.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph152195949761207918.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph152195949761207918.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 03:39:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 03:39:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 03:39:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 785 ms
[2022-05-18 03:39:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-18 03:39:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4333869384025743197.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 03:39:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15935927606978301811.ctl : 82 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4333869384025743197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15935927606978301811.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,10.7889,215004,7673,3092,180936,14444,5221,96189,1327,106108,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u4.Forks_7>=1)&&(u4.Thi...96330
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Fork...96379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t4, t13, t15, t18, t22, t26, t28, t33, t41, t45, t46, t47, t48, t50, t54, t59, t60, t...5362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,107.111,2238832,1,0,2.63708e+06,279285,13196,1.93198e+06,3030,1.11883e+06,4309885
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(((((((((((E(AF(EG((((((u7.Think_9>=1)||(u9.Think_1>=1))||((u8.Think_2>=1)||(u6.Think_5>=1)))||(((u3.Think_3>=1)||(u2.Think_4>=1))||((u...190683
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((((((((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((((((((((u3.Neighbourhood_3_8>=1)&&(u1.Forks_8>=1))&&((u3.Forks_3>=1)&&(...190780
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 1,0,223.669,2483756,1,0,3.63324e+06,279285,28063,3.25937e+06,4152,1.11883e+06,9294824
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((!(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((u7.Neighbourhood_9_4>=1)&&(u7.WaitRight_9>=1))&&(u2.Forks_4>=1))||(((u6.WaitRight_5>=1)&&(u6.Neighbourhood...205901
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((u7.Neighbourhood_9_4>=1)&&(u7.WaitRight_9>=1))&&(u2.F...205973
(forward)formula 2,1,318.313,2882656,1,0,3.87366e+06,279285,13216,3.25937e+06,3039,1.11883e+06,8315339
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (A((EG(((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u4.Forks_7>=1)&&(u4.T...297172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!((((((((EG(E((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=...518700
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,1,411.315,3142168,1,0,4.30893e+06,279285,28128,3.6032e+06,5251,1.11883e+06,32331579
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(!(A((((((u7.Think_9>=1)||(u9.Think_1>=1))||((u8.Think_2>=1)||(u6.Think_5>=1)))||(((u3.Think_3>=1)||(u2.Think_4>=1))||((u0.Think_10>=1)...429
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((u0.Outside_10>=1)&&(u2.Outside_4>=1))&&((u3.Outside_3>=1)&&(u6.Out...967
(forward)formula 4,1,434.417,3157416,1,0,4.34041e+06,279285,14886,3.65192e+06,3047,1.11883e+06,2313975
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u4.Forks_7>=1)&&(u4.Think_...214358
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Forks_2>=...407053
(forward)formula 5,0,466.133,3157416,1,0,4.34041e+06,279285,22060,3.65192e+06,4535,1.11883e+06,15352579
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX((!(A(((((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u8.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u4.Forks_7>=1)&&(u...495873
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((E((((((u7.Think_9>=1)||(u9.Think_1>=1))||((u8.Think_2>=1)||(u6.Think_5>=1)))||(((u3.Thi...1827564
(forward)formula 6,1,516.622,3157416,1,0,4.34041e+06,279285,31122,3.65192e+06,5414,1.11883e+06,32590136
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-PT-10-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX(E(A(EG((((((((((((u9.Neighbourhood_1_9>=1)&&(u9.HasLeft_1>=1))&&(u9.HasRight_1>=1))||(((u0.HasRight_10>=1)&&(u0.Neighbourhood_10_6>=1)...280227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!((E(!((((((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(u8.Think_2>=1))&&((u5.Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(u...472911
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2022-05-18 03:48:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 443 ms
[2022-05-18 03:48:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11437554360916473308.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 03:48:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability242340843967759884.ctl : 13 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11437554360916473308.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability242340843967759884.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,75.8576,1807524,2,179744,5,2.28059e+06,6,0,2588,768410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(A(EG((((((((((((Neighbourhood_1_9>=1)&&(HasLeft_1>=1))&&(HasRight_1>=1))||(((HasRight_10>=1)&&(Neighbourhood_10_6>=1))&&(HasLeft_10>...243027
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!((E(!((((((((((((((Neighbourhood_2_10>=1)&&(Think_2>=1))&&((Neighbourhood_6_2>=1)&&(Forks_2>=1...408236
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
[2022-05-18 03:57:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 791 ms
[2022-05-18 03:57:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 03:57:22] [INFO ] Transformed 170 places.
[2022-05-18 03:57:22] [INFO ] Transformed 1885 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
P-invariant computation with GreatSPN timed out. Skipping.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2022-05-18 03:57:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12788939307952894426.gal : 32 ms
[2022-05-18 03:57:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10114463714830674563.ctl : 24 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12788939307952894426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10114463714830674563.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...321
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 137
Total runtime 2657371 ms.

BK_STOP 1652846699361

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PhilosophersDyn-PT-10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is PhilosophersDyn-PT-10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r168-tall-165277016600418"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PhilosophersDyn-PT-10.tgz
mv PhilosophersDyn-PT-10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;