Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r168-tall-165277016600378.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is PhilosophersDyn-COL-10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r168-tall-165277016600378
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 272K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K Apr 30 07:53 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Apr 30 07:53 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Apr 30 07:50 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K Apr 30 07:50 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 9 08:27 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 9 08:27 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 9 08:27 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 9 08:27 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 9 08:27 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 08:27 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652834831588

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-18 00:47:12] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-18 00:47:12] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-18 00:47:12] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2022-05-18 00:47:13] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2022-05-18 00:47:13] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 612 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:13] [INFO ] Imported 8 HL places and 7 HL transitions for a total of 170 PT places and 2320.0 transition bindings in 20 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 17 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:47:13] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 8 places and 7 transitions 33 arcs in 6 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:47:13] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 9 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 701 resets, run finished after 94 ms. (steps per millisecond=106 ) properties (out of 14) seen :13
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 540 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=625 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 8 cols
[2022-05-18 00:47:13] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 17 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:13] [INFO ] After 85ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0
Fused 1 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [Philosopher(10), Philosopher(10)] of place Neighbourhood breaks symmetries in sort Philosopher
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 170 places and 2310 transitions 18190 arcs in 55 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 11 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Reduced 89 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 45 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 45 transitions.
Support contains 170 out of 170 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 2265/2265 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 35 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 2265/2265 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1905 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1905 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:47:14] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 63 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:15] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 938 ms found 380 transitions.
Found 380 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions removed 380 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 380 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:47:15] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 41 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:47:15] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 35 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:47:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 582 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 682 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/170 places, 1885/2265 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/2265 transitions.
Support contains 170 out of 170 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-18 00:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 682 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 996 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1187 resets, run finished after 1152 ms. (steps per millisecond=8 ) properties (out of 39) seen :33
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 97 resets, run finished after 90 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 66 resets, run finished after 3572 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 79 resets, run finished after 1325 ms. (steps per millisecond=7 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 138 resets, run finished after 1069 ms. (steps per millisecond=9 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 75 resets, run finished after 1223 ms. (steps per millisecond=8 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 268 ms. (steps per millisecond=37 ) properties (out of 6) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:47:42] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:47:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:47:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:47:56] [INFO ] After 284ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :2 sat :0 real:4
[2022-05-18 00:47:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:47:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:47:57] [INFO ] After 874ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :3
[2022-05-18 00:47:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:48:04] [INFO ] After 6846ms SMT Verify possible using 1010 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :3
[2022-05-18 00:48:06] [INFO ] After 8441ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 4429 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:48:10] [INFO ] After 14082ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :3
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 34 ms.
Support contains 170 out of 170 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 162 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:48:10] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 00:48:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 739 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1201 resets, run finished after 962 ms. (steps per millisecond=10 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 65 resets, run finished after 3887 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 79 resets, run finished after 1316 ms. (steps per millisecond=7 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 265 ms. (steps per millisecond=37 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 576933 steps, run timeout after 18001 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties seen :{}
Probabilistic random walk after 576933 steps, saw 142198 distinct states, run finished after 18003 ms. (steps per millisecond=32 ) properties seen :0
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:48:36] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 25 ms
[2022-05-18 00:48:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:48:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:48:45] [INFO ] After 218ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3
[2022-05-18 00:48:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:48:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:48:47] [INFO ] After 1145ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2022-05-18 00:48:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:48:49] [INFO ] After 1767ms SMT Verify possible using 1010 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2022-05-18 00:48:49] [INFO ] After 2273ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 544 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:48:50] [INFO ] After 4214ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 59 ms.
Support contains 170 out of 170 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 85 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 126 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:48:50] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 00:48:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:48:50] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 26 ms
[2022-05-18 00:48:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:48:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 534 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 613 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 00:48:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 134 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:48:51] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 00:48:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 626 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 45 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:48:51] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 00:48:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:48:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:48:59] [INFO ] After 205ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3
[2022-05-18 00:48:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:48:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2022-05-18 00:49:01] [INFO ] After 1146ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2022-05-18 00:49:01] [INFO ] After 1542ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 652 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:49:02] [INFO ] After 2419ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2022-05-18 00:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 125 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality640355149293327733.gal : 26 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4242247908964804900.prop : 26 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /tmp/redAtoms17697516402235108671;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality640355149293327733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4242247908964804900.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp...318
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4242247908964804900.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :10 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :14 after 49
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :49 after 103
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :103 after 409
Reachability property AtomicPropp35 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :409 after 612
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :612 after 775
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :775 after 2027
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :2027 after 3177
Reachability property AtomicPropp20 is true.
Reachability property AtomicPropp16 is true.
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 1025 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,21207,12.6918,102604,2,5538,18,109478,6,0,2578,69790,0
Total reachable state count : 21207

Verifying 3 reachability properties.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-18 00:49:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 483 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 864 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 233 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:49:32] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 774 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:49:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:49:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:49:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2701 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2860 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 00:49:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 106 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:49:36] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 586 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 98 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 152 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 111 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 111 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11416109299570757133.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 00:49:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12186739283630806363.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11416109299570757133.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12186739283630806363.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:50:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 114 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8930939952163596092.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8930939952163596092.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8930939952163596092.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8930939952163596092.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8930939952163596092.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:50:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:50:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:50:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 730 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 23 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:50:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17047946854922001220.gal : 19 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15799690612373767980.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17047946854922001220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15799690612373767980.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.68493,188776,7414,1066,180574,5809,4529,76967,629,40617,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((((((((((((((u4.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u3.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u4.Think_2>=1)&&(u4.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u4.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(...93543
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((((((((((((((u4.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u3.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u4.Think_2>=1)&&(u4.Forks_2...90776
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 86 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:50:39] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 26 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:40] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 697 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:50:40] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:50:40] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:50:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1327 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1419 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 00:50:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 35 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:50:42] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 614 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:50:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 112 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 142 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 151 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 163 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5790947455824678696.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 00:50:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10258322941675592554.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5790947455824678696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10258322941675592554.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:51:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 132 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 131 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17158201094382834730.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17158201094382834730.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17158201094382834730.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17158201094382834730.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17158201094382834730.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 438 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13700662817804068859.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17595774695719349261.ctl : 16 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13700662817804068859.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17595774695719349261.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.62949,180100,7414,1066,175302,5920,4526,75292,626,40980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((((((((((E(AF(EG((((((u7.Think_4>=1)||(u4.Think_5>=1))||((u2.Think_2>=1)||(u3.Think_3>=1)))||(((u9.Think_8>=1)||(u6.Think_9>=1))||((u...186153
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((((((((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((((((((((u9.Neighbourhood_89>=1)&&(u9.Outside_8>=1))&&((u9.Forks_8>=1)&&...182486
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 97 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:51:45] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:45] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 650 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:51:45] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:51:45] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:51:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 537 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 622 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 00:51:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:51:46] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 47 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:47] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 652 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 124 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 150 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 145 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 146 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10928249233927514441.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 00:51:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7975689593264379372.ctl : 18 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10928249233927514441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7975689593264379372.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 154 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 150 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11801764610417562222.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11801764610417562222.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11801764610417562222.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11801764610417562222.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11801764610417562222.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:52:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:52:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:52:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2876 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:52:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 460 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:52:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8154819618422049435.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1835886148646392008.ctl : 13 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8154819618422049435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1835886148646392008.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,10.9931,239928,7306,6013,210972,32283,6650,292179,1436,331274,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((i5.u6.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(i5.u6.Forks_9>=1))&&(i3.u16.WaitRight_4>=1))||(((i0.u0.Neighbourhood_8>=1)&&(...224962
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((i5.u6.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(i5.u6.Forks_9>=1))&&(i3....221501
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:52:49] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:50] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 644 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:52:50] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:52:50] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:52:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1047 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:52:51] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:51] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 664 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:52:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 126 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 167 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:52:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 157 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 159 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11835057820595609608.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 00:52:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9284981702446134108.ctl : 21 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11835057820595609608.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9284981702446134108.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:53:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 151 ms
[2022-05-18 00:53:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:53:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 151 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16839777685053274592.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16839777685053274592.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16839777685053274592.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16839777685053274592.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16839777685053274592.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:53:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:53:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:53:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3026 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:53:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 443 ms
[2022-05-18 00:53:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:53:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15490679308746374938.gal : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 00:53:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12159084344539030785.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15490679308746374938.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12159084344539030785.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.88771,191200,7567,1121,179313,6030,4880,80975,700,41893,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((EG(((((((((((((((u6.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u9.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u6.Think_2>=1)&&(u6.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u6.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&...294703
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!((((((((EG(E((((((((((((((u6.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u9.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u6.Think_2>=1)&...512208
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 170 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:53:54] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 00:53:55] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 626 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:53:55] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:53:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 318 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:53:55] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 27 ms
[2022-05-18 00:53:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:54:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6903 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 00:54:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:54:02] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 606 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 97 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 92 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 95 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10819232181845500113.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11138342709042618047.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10819232181845500113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11138342709042618047.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 94 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 95 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17421077929649026335.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17421077929649026335.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17421077929649026335.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17421077929649026335.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17421077929649026335.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:54:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:54:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:54:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:54:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 409 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:54:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3505479091949071735.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 00:54:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8866373104980961079.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3505479091949071735.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8866373104980961079.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,9.14368,185360,7414,1066,179309,5827,4528,76660,628,40458,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:55:04] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 35 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 636 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:55:05] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:55:05] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 27 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1410 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1541 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:55:06] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 606 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 133 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 128 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7277151076997645194.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4044048898497302953.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7277151076997645194.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4044048898497302953.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:55:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 132 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:55:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 132 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9199833498065383030.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9199833498065383030.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9199833498065383030.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9199833498065383030.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9199833498065383030.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:55:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:55:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:55:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:55:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 417 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:55:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15059029968211024434.gal : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 00:55:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15864737233069844924.ctl : 14 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15059029968211024434.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15864737233069844924.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.96673,190056,7414,1066,182130,5792,4519,77568,619,39489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((((((((((((((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u6.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u2.Think_2>=1)&&(u2.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u7....208333
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((((((((((((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u6.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u2.Think_2>=1)&&(u2.Forks_2>=1))...393778
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:56:09] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:10] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 623 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:56:10] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 26 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:56:10] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:56:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 520 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 594 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:56:10] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 636 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:56:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 166 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 170 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:56:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 179 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 180 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7357288587361061871.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2467243276111502391.ctl : 35 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7357288587361061871.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2467243276111502391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:56:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 173 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 172 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14242436964840327625.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14242436964840327625.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14242436964840327625.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14242436964840327625.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14242436964840327625.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 479 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7166022953204277816.gal : 13 ms
[2022-05-18 00:56:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9076552855848629928.ctl : 26 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7166022953204277816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9076552855848629928.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.64468,190828,7408,1069,182050,6461,4529,80199,629,49090,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((!(A(((((((((((((((((u5.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u9.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u5.Think_2>=1)&&(u5.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u5.Neighbourhood_24>=...484624
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((E((((((u1.Think_4>=1)||(u7.Think_5>=1))||((u5.Think_2>=1)||(u6.Think_3>=1)))||(((u9.Thi...1784559
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:57:14] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 607 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:57:14] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:57:14] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:57:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 994 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1065 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:57:15] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:16] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 592 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:57:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 117 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 145 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:57:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 142 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 147 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9624809429820954057.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2218022999807700827.ctl : 16 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9624809429820954057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2218022999807700827.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 146 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 140 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8682345309793915516.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8682345309793915516.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8682345309793915516.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8682345309793915516.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8682345309793915516.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:57:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:57:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:57:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:57:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 430 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:57:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3986265872832911421.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 00:57:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17407324269248747140.ctl : 15 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3986265872832911421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17407324269248747140.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.67458,187148,7414,1066,180010,5778,4533,76652,633,40888,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(A(EG((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_16>=1)&&(u1.HasLeft_1>=1))&&(u1.HasRight_1>=1))||(((u4.Neighbourhood_56>=1)&&(u4.HasLeft_5>=1))&&(u...273959
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!((E(!((((((((((((((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u7.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u2.Think_2>=1)&&(u2.F...459224
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 81 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:58:18] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 33 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:19] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 593 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:58:19] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:58:19] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:58:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2630 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2773 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 00:58:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:58:22] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 568 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:58:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 95 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 111 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:58:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 109 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11441974838710210053.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7104580730800666053.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11441974838710210053.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7104580730800666053.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:58:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:58:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4082424336924830880.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4082424336924830880.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4082424336924830880.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4082424336924830880.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4082424336924830880.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:58:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:58:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:58:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2726 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:58:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 441 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:58:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2578568176032974493.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 00:58:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability129524775979248493.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2578568176032974493.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability129524775979248493.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,11.6807,292016,6505,8403,272486,74514,5736,283417,1390,1.02912e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((((((((((((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u5.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u2.Think_2>=1)&&(u2.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(...99285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((((((((((((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u5.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u2.Think_2>=1)&&(u2.Forks_2>=...97322
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 81 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:59:24] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 29 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:24] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 587 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:59:24] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:59:25] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 00:59:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 485 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 558 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 00:59:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 00:59:25] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 582 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 146 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:59:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 147 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 148 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17878536817153418278.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4144071345208375334.ctl : 15 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17878536817153418278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4144071345208375334.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 00:59:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 150 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 00:59:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 149 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12196682625209510576.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12196682625209510576.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12196682625209510576.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12196682625209510576.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12196682625209510576.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 00:59:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 00:59:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 00:59:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2864 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 00:59:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 411 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-05-18 00:59:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9777725944905653965.gal : 13 ms
[2022-05-18 00:59:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17396558081044044613.ctl : 19 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9777725944905653965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17396558081044044613.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,13.4472,328376,8138,5132,262792,31757,6290,381122,1286,476373,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG((((((i6.u8.Think_4<1)&&(i2.u3.Think_5<1))&&((i1.u2.Think_2<1)&&(i5.u7.Think_3<1)))&&(((i7.u9.Think_8<1)&&(u6.Think_9<1))&&((u4.Th...303995
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((((((i6.u8.Think_4<1)&&(i2.u3.Think_5<1))&&((i1.u2.Think_2<1)&&(i5.u7.Think_3<1)))&&(((i7.u9.T...482436
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:00:28] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 27 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 579 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:00:29] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:00:29] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 21 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 01:00:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 490 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 553 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:00:29] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 21 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 580 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:00:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 146 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 203 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 201 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 200 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1174096983343295162.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 01:00:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13245946126224235975.ctl : 31 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1174096983343295162.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13245946126224235975.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 01:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 204 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 01:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 201 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15968733671932869086.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15968733671932869086.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15968733671932869086.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15968733671932869086.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15968733671932869086.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 01:01:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 01:01:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 01:01:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:01:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 515 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 01:01:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6121968570352972822.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10713733913022534977.ctl : 34 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6121968570352972822.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10713733913022534977.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.46675,195120,7414,1066,184021,5594,4531,77782,631,36545,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AF((((((((((((E(((((((((((u4.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(u7.Forks_9>=1))&&(u4.WaitRight_4>=1))||(((u0.Neighbourhood_8>=1)&&(u6.Forks_8>=1)...581486
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !((EG(EX((((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_18<1)||(u5.Outside_7<1))||((u1.Forks_1<1)||(u6.Forks...950417
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 90 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:01:33] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:33] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 587 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:01:34] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:01:34] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 01:01:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2285 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2512 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 01:01:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:01:36] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 28 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 579 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 97 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 94 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5129677565231813352.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-18 01:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2453469170548903213.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5129677565231813352.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2453469170548903213.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 01:02:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 92 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 93 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8972442929687382596.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8972442929687382596.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8972442929687382596.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8972442929687382596.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8972442929687382596.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 359 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8990281139988604361.gal : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5674014244756222.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8990281139988604361.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5674014244756222.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...250
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.03632,176672,7398,1052,171936,5887,4525,75236,625,47483,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((((((EG(EF(((((((((((u7.Neighbourhood_16>=1)&&(u7.HasLeft_1>=1))&&(u7.HasRight_1>=1))||(((u2.Neighbourhood_56>=1)&&(u2.HasLeft_5>=1)...13913
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((((((([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(E(TRUE U ((((((((((u7.Neighbourhood_16>=1)&&(u7.HasLeft_1>=1))&&(u7.HasRight_1>=...14204
(forward)formula 0,0,8.13921,176672,1,0,171936,8095,4853,75236,743,47483,22224
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 84 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:02:16] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 31 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 580 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:02:17] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 25 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:02:17] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 01:02:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 484 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 570 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 01:02:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 32 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:02:18] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 570 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 97 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 111 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3340582813982702533.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4694599818197002463.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3340582813982702533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4694599818197002463.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 01:02:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 123 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 01:02:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 113 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16256540445237348689.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16256540445237348689.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16256540445237348689.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16256540445237348689.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16256540445237348689.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 01:02:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 01:02:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 01:02:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:02:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 381 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 01:02:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15529501763055803549.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-18 01:02:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9070583609899511253.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15529501763055803549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9070583609899511253.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.16816,183788,7408,1127,176011,6234,4530,77275,630,45477,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(((((!(AG((A(!((((((((((((((u5.Neighbourhood_18<1)||(u9.Outside_7<1))||((u5.Forks_1<1)||(u2.Forks_8<1)))&&(((u4.Neighbourhood_1<1)||(u...95819
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!(((((((u6.Forks_2>=1)&&(u6.WaitLeft_2>=1))||((u1.Forks_6>=1)&&(u1.WaitLeft...96692
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:03:20] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 25 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:20] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 561 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:03:20] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 36 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:03:20] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 01:03:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 483 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 567 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:03:21] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 570 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 269 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 194 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 208 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 207 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18287595377412530145.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7801934864203625231.ctl : 30 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18287595377412530145.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7801934864203625231.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 01:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 207 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 01:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 206 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph269984807722831840.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph269984807722831840.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph269984807722831840.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph269984807722831840.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph269984807722831840.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 01:03:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 01:03:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 01:03:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2660 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 522 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-18 01:03:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13331738095137147378.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-18 01:03:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3440878064174634282.ctl : 32 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13331738095137147378.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3440878064174634282.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.02724,179796,7414,1066,175175,5641,4525,74569,625,39920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((((((A(AX((((((u0.Outside_0>=1)&&(u1.Outside_1>=1))&&((u2.Outside_2>=1)&&(u5.Outside_3>=1)))&&(((u6.Outside_4>=1)&&(u3.Outside_5>=1))...555600
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(((((((!((E(!(!(E((((((u6.Think_4>=1)||(u3.Think_5>=1))||((u2.Think_2>=1)||(u5.Think_3>=1)))||...566703
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:04:25] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 24 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:25] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 567 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:04:25] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 26 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:04:25] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 01:04:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 486 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 558 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:04:26] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 588 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 164 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 362 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:04:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 240 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 241 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6623588615394157558.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12247022917525332883.ctl : 40 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6623588615394157558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12247022917525332883.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 01:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 239 ms
[2022-05-18 01:04:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 01:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 238 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8955853303954022601.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8955853303954022601.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8955853303954022601.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8955853303954022601.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8955853303954022601.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 01:04:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 01:04:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 01:05:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2750 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:05:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 538 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-18 01:05:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6418642209255589197.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9505934886253701995.ctl : 42 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6418642209255589197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9505934886253701995.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,9.36234,213280,7656,1150,177921,4834,5191,89389,738,23060,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(EG(((((((((((i3.u5.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(i3.u5.Forks_9>=1))&&(u2.WaitRight_4>=1))||(((i9.u9.Neighbourhood_8>=1)&&(i9.u9.Forks_8>=1)...858337
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(((FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((((((u2.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(i8.u0.Neighbourhood_82>=1))...4556574
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 89 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1885/1885 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:05:31] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 30 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 564 ms found 0 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:05:31] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:05:31] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 23 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1010 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-18 01:05:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2667 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2848 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-18 01:05:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 1885 rows 170 cols
[2022-05-18 01:05:34] [INFO ] Computed 39 place invariants in 22 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 579 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 170/170 places, 1885/1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 95 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 112 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1885 transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 111 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14476284706355934381.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-18 01:05:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7808010345066512686.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14476284706355934381.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7808010345066512686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-18 01:06:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 109 ms
[2022-05-18 01:06:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 109 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9096619559496850898.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9096619559496850898.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9096619559496850898.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9096619559496850898.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9096619559496850898.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3116 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 358 ms
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4853203585537996840.gal : 12 ms
[2022-05-18 01:06:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12405970312654674408.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4853203585537996840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12405970312654674408.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.82281,209232,7754,669,177655,2257,5360,87731,634,8720,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((((((((((((i3.u8.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(i7.u2.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((i7.u2.Think_2>=1)&&(i7.u2.Forks_2>=1)))||(((i3.u8.Neighbou...105713
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((((((((((((i3.u8.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(i7.u2.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((i7.u2.Think_2>=1)&&(i7....103182
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-18 01:06:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 984 ms
[2022-05-18 01:06:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 793 ms
[2022-05-18 01:06:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-18 01:06:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 798 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8978638086169460050.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8978638086169460050.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8978638086169460050.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8978638086169460050.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8978638086169460050.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-18 01:06:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-18 01:06:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-18 01:06:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3026 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-18 01:06:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1521 ms
[2022-05-18 01:06:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2022-05-18 01:06:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7694887077475931883.gal : 7 ms
[2022-05-18 01:06:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11074636123908835367.ctl : 201 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7694887077475931883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11074636123908835367.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,199051,8.4769,205460,7553,1116,181577,6174,4871,85980,693,42621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&...95139
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_...95188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t855, t856, t857, t858, t859, t860, t861, t862, t863, t864, t865, t866, t867, t868, t869, t87...5691
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,85.9465,2181364,1,0,2.72045e+06,178201,12501,1.9107e+06,1391,629761,2230138
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(((((((((((E(AF(EG((((((u8.Think_4>=1)||(u3.Think_5>=1))||((u1.Think_2>=1)||(i6.u7.Think_3>=1)))||(((u10.Think_8>=1)||(u5.Think_9>=1))|...189451
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((((((((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((((((((((u10.Neighbourhood_89>=1)&&(u10.Outside_8>=1))&&((u10.Forks_8>=1...189548
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 1,0,190.947,2890500,1,0,3.92724e+06,180306,16390,3.47077e+06,1452,629761,3416673
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((!(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(u5.Forks_9>=1))&&(u8.WaitRight_4>=1))||(((u0.Neighbourhood_8>=1)&&(u10.Forks_8>=...204641
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((((((((((((!((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(u5.Forks_9>=1))&&(u8.WaitRi...204713
(forward)formula 2,1,266.04,2901680,1,0,3.92724e+06,180306,33760,3.47077e+06,2406,629761,31200768
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (A((EG(((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)...294703
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!((((((((EG(E((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)...513769
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,1,382.511,3206068,1,0,4.55094e+06,187136,25275,3.47077e+06,2394,629761,22862670
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(!(A((((((u8.Think_4>=1)||(u3.Think_5>=1))||((u1.Think_2>=1)||(i6.u7.Think_3>=1)))||(((u10.Think_8>=1)||(u5.Think_9>=1))||((u9.Think_6>...435
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((u0.Outside_0>=1)&&(u6.Outside_1>=1))&&((u1.Outside_2>=1)&&(i6.u7.O...979
(forward)formula 4,1,385.431,3206068,1,0,4.55094e+06,187136,27010,3.47077e+06,2414,629761,23438090
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u8...211919
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>=1)...402232
(forward)formula 5,0,404.852,3206068,1,0,4.85202e+06,207111,27090,3.91427e+06,2438,629761,29056201
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX((!(A(((((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u1.Neighbourhood_24>...493296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(((E((((((u8.Think_4>=1)||(u3.Think_5>=1))||((u1.Think_2>=1)||(i6.u7.Think_3>=1)))||(((u10...1817489
(forward)formula 6,1,457.821,3527092,1,0,5.25139e+06,224792,12501,4.30176e+06,1391,643381,14720815
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX(E(A(EG((((((((((((u6.Neighbourhood_16>=1)&&(u6.HasLeft_1>=1))&&(u6.HasRight_1>=1))||(((u3.Neighbourhood_56>=1)&&(u3.HasLeft_5>=1))&&(u...278939
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!((E(!((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1....469241
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 7,1,522.211,3527092,1,0,5.25139e+06,224792,34332,4.30176e+06,2470,643381,37251209
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(EG((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&...95139
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>...95184
(forward)formula 8,0,537.225,3579364,1,0,5.25139e+06,224792,38207,4.30176e+06,2502,643381,41594895
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((EG((((((u8.Think_4<1)&&(u3.Think_5<1))&&((u1.Think_2<1)&&(i6.u7.Think_3<1)))&&(((u10.Think_8<1)&&(u5.Think_9<1))&&((u9.Think_6<1)&&(...278089
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((((((u8.Think_4<1)&&(u3.Think_5<1))&&((u1.Think_2<1)&&(i6.u7.Think_3<1)))&&(((u10.Think_8<1)&&...443523
(forward)formula 9,0,581.728,3921316,1,0,5.31438e+06,224792,30086,4.30176e+06,1893,745878,7209566
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG(AF((((((((((((E(((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(u5.Forks_9>=1))&&(u8.WaitRight_4>=1))||(((u0.Neighbourhood_8>=1)&&(u10.Forks_8>=1...591880
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !((EG(EX((((((((((((((((u6.Neighbourhood_18<1)||(u4.Outside_7<1))||((u6.Forks_1<1)||(u10.Fork...970881
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 10,0,729.997,4528512,1,0,6.16584e+06,238924,12246,4.98368e+06,1391,745878,6828302
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: !(E(((((!(AG((A(!((((((((((((((u6.Neighbourhood_18<1)||(u4.Outside_7<1))||((u6.Forks_1<1)||(u10.Forks_8<1)))&&(((u0.Neighbourhood_1<1)||(...97651
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!(((((((u1.Forks_2>=1)&&(u1.WaitLeft_2>=1))||((u9.Forks_6>=1)&&(u9.WaitLeft...98562
(forward)formula 11,0,793.624,4528512,1,0,6.16584e+06,238924,23985,4.98368e+06,1830,745878,30146058
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((((((((A(AX((((((u0.Outside_0>=1)&&(u6.Outside_1>=1))&&((u1.Outside_2>=1)&&(i6.u7.Outside_3>=1)))&&(((u8.Outside_4>=1)&&(u3.Outside_5>=...565848
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(((((((!((E(!(!(E((((((u8.Think_4>=1)||(u3.Think_5>=1))||((u1.Think_2>=1)||(i6.u7.Think_3>=1))...580814
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 12,0,826.184,4528512,1,0,6.16584e+06,238924,30124,4.98368e+06,2384,745878,38527390
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (!(A(EG(((((((((((u8.Neighbourhood_49>=1)&&(u5.Forks_9>=1))&&(u8.WaitRight_4>=1))||(((u0.Neighbourhood_8>=1)&&(u10.Forks_8>=1))&&(u0.Wait...779267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(((FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&...4148394
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 13,1,1058.29,4969140,1,0,6.37224e+06,274338,36377,5.51068e+06,2918,823741,37966179
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(EG((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>=1)))||(((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&...95139
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((((((((((((u1.Neighbourhood_24>=1)&&(u10.Neighbourhood_82>=1))&&((u1.Think_2>=1)&&(u1.Forks_2>...95184
(forward)formula 14,0,1074.9,4969140,1,0,6.51846e+06,274338,42849,5.82734e+06,3017,823741,43267615
FORMULA PhilosophersDyn-COL-10-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 2259114 ms.

BK_STOP 1652837092025

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PhilosophersDyn-COL-10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is PhilosophersDyn-COL-10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r168-tall-165277016600378"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PhilosophersDyn-COL-10.tgz
mv PhilosophersDyn-COL-10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;