fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
Execution of r168-tall-165277016100058
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Peterson-PT-3

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
3156.548 1058447.00 1114036.00 11174.70 TFFFTTFTTFTFTTTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r168-tall-165277016100058.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-PT-3, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r168-tall-165277016100058
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 812K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Apr 30 09:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 212K Apr 30 09:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K Apr 30 09:17 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 169K Apr 30 09:17 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 10 09:34 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 9 08:24 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 9 08:24 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 9 08:24 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 9 08:24 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 9 08:24 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 9 08:24 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 143K May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652779355692

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-17 09:22:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-17 09:22:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 94 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Transformed 244 places.
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Transformed 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [TestAlone_1_2_3, TestAlone_2_2_3]
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 244 places and 332 transitions in 196 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 20 ms.
Support contains 237 out of 244 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 21 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 211 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:37] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 197 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Support contains 237 out of 244 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-17 09:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 655 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 ) properties (out of 65) seen :47
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 ) properties (out of 18) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 16 properties.
[2022-05-17 09:22:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:39] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:39] [INFO ] After 267ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:16
[2022-05-17 09:22:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 09:22:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 09:22:40] [INFO ] After 574ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
[2022-05-17 09:22:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-17 09:22:41] [INFO ] After 387ms SMT Verify possible using 57 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :16
[2022-05-17 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 103 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 274 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 73 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 15/14 trap constraints in 1537 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:43] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 14/13 trap constraints in 1018 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 223 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 48 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 2 trap constraints in 118 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 62 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 230 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 117 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 144 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 55 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 144 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 60 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 1 trap constraints in 73 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:45] [INFO ] After 4515ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :13
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 521 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:22:45] [INFO ] After 6232ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :3 sat :13
Fused 16 Parikh solutions to 13 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 135 ms.
Support contains 134 out of 244 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 244 transition count 325
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 237 transition count 325
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 237 transition count 298
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 210 transition count 298
Applied a total of 68 rules in 25 ms. Remains 210 /244 variables (removed 34) and now considering 298/332 (removed 34) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 210/244 places, 298/332 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 219 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 115 ms. (steps per millisecond=86 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 61 ms. (steps per millisecond=163 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 47 ms. (steps per millisecond=212 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=192 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 48 ms. (steps per millisecond=208 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 49 ms. (steps per millisecond=204 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 44 ms. (steps per millisecond=227 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 50 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 69 ms. (steps per millisecond=144 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 85 ms. (steps per millisecond=117 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 395520 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=131 ) properties seen :{}
Probabilistic random walk after 395520 steps, saw 81796 distinct states, run finished after 3002 ms. (steps per millisecond=131 ) properties seen :0
Running SMT prover for 10 properties.
[2022-05-17 09:22:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 210 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:49] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] After 92ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:10
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] After 315ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :10
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] After 257ms SMT Verify possible using 57 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :10
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 15/14 trap constraints in 995 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 54 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 283 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 275 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 135 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 60 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 8/7 trap constraints in 445 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 160 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 64 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] After 2909ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :10
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 313 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] After 3660ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :10
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 77 ms.
Support contains 134 out of 210 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 210/210 places, 298/298 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 210 /210 variables (removed 0) and now considering 298/298 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 210/210 places, 298/298 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 210/210 places, 298/298 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 210 /210 variables (removed 0) and now considering 298/298 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 210 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 210 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-17 09:22:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 210 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 135 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 210/210 places, 298/298 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 24 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 24 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 210 transition count 274
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -40
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 202 transition count 314
Drop transitions removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 202 transition count 308
Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 202 transition count 304
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 198 transition count 304
Applied a total of 54 rules in 29 ms. Remains 198 /210 variables (removed 12) and now considering 304/298 (removed -6) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 10 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 304 rows 198 cols
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] After 76ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:10
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 09:22:54] [INFO ] After 327ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :10
[2022-05-17 09:22:55] [INFO ] After 688ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :10
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 280 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:22:55] [INFO ] After 1096ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :10
[2022-05-17 09:22:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1866885565058243930.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-17 09:22:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7073058241272322454.prop : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /tmp/redAtoms15981822944160754685;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1866885565058243930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7073058241272322454.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp...319
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7073058241272322454.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,10 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,10 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 7
SDD proceeding with computation,10 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :7 after 12
Reachability property AtomicPropp63 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,9 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :12 after 15
SDD proceeding with computation,9 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :15 after 37
Reachability property AtomicPropp12 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :37 after 146
Reachability property AtomicPropp44 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,7 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :146 after 420
SDD proceeding with computation,7 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :420 after 947
SDD proceeding with computation,7 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :947 after 2625
SDD proceeding with computation,7 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :2625 after 13740
SDD proceeding with computation,7 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :13740 after 107042
SDD proceeding with computation,7 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :107042 after 618786
Reachability property AtomicPropp58 is true.
Reachability property AtomicPropp56 is true.
Reachability property AtomicPropp45 is true.
Reachability property AtomicPropp6 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :618786 after 8.39198e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :8.39198e+06 after 8.83514e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :8.83514e+06 after 1.45658e+07
SDD proceeding with computation,3 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :1.45658e+07 after 9.3368e+07
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,2.50782e+08,6.28334,23932,2,3100,28,108657,9,0,1107,72956,0
Total reachable state count : 250781696

Verifying 10 reachability properties.
Reachability property AtomicPropp6 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp6,13824,6.32798,24196,2,4832,28,108657,10,0,1420,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp12 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp12,4,6.33206,24196,2,204,28,108657,11,0,1496,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp27 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp27,840,6.33266,24196,2,367,28,108657,11,0,1496,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp44 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp44,4,6.3332,24196,2,204,28,108657,12,0,1496,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp45 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp45,56,6.33385,24196,2,276,28,108657,13,0,1501,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp53 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp53,5.45178e+06,6.3345,24196,2,1543,28,108657,13,0,1501,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp56 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp56,461280,6.3351,24196,2,1185,28,108657,14,0,1503,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp58 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp58,376320,6.33568,24196,2,1099,28,108657,15,0,1504,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp60 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp60,56,6.33623,24196,2,258,28,108657,15,0,1505,72956,0
Reachability property AtomicPropp63 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
AtomicPropp63,4,6.33665,24196,2,204,28,108657,16,0,1506,72956,0
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-17 09:23:01] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2022-05-17 09:23:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 244 transition count 329
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 241 transition count 326
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 238 transition count 326
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 229 transition count 317
Applied a total of 30 rules in 24 ms. Remains 229 /244 variables (removed 15) and now considering 317/332 (removed 15) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 293 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 293 rows 229 cols
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [215, 216, 217, 218]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 225/244 places, 317/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 225 /225 variables (removed 0) and now considering 317/317 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 225/244 places, 317/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 317 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10356646065772153542.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12453903385567208826.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10356646065772153542.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12453903385567208826.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.05504e+06,15.3675,385280,2,67573,5,1.03075e+06,6,0,1220,1.62456e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF((EG(AG(((((((((WantSection_2_F==1)&&(TestAlone_3_1_2==1))||((WantSection_2_F==1)&&(TestAlone_0_2_2==1)))||(((WantSection_2_F==1)&&(T...13879
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(((((((((WantSection_2_F==1)&&(TestAlone_3_1_2==1))||((WantSection_2_F==1)&&(TestAlone_0_2_2=...31176
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-17 09:23:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:23:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16569418325030480865.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16569418325030480865.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16569418325030480865.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16569418325030480865.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16569418325030480865.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:23:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:23:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:23:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 347 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:23:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8805474682976941703.gal : 5 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability696995561954114833.ctl : 19 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8805474682976941703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability696995561954114833.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.05504e+06,5.46544,159464,2616,187,177377,4960,699,1.16307e+06,91,33961,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF((EG(AG(((((((((i8.i1.u45.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i6.u50.TestAlone_3_1_2==1))||((i8.i1.u45.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i13.i1.u76.TestAlone_0...19339
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(((((((((i8.i1.u45.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i6.u50.TestAlone_3_1_2==1))||((i8.i1.u45.WantSection...48430
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t61, t62, t63, t120, t121, t122, t123, t124, t125, t126, t127, t128, t129, t130, t131, t...761
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,18.6249,449140,1,0,465824,6457,5792,3.62397e+06,581,34003,987279
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 187 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8128969620233200517.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-17 09:23:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10513547495611102389.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8128969620233200517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10513547495611102389.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,16.7087,422708,2,73296,5,1.12801e+06,6,0,1311,1.8281e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!((((((((((AF((((((((BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((BeginLoop_3_0_0==1)||(BeginLoop_2_0_0==1)))||(((BeginLoop_1_0_1==1)...15180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((((BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((BeginLoop_3_0_0==1)||(BeginLoop_2_0_0==1))...17587
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18437222690354348663.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18437222690354348663.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18437222690354348663.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18437222690354348663.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18437222690354348663.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 216 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1716083771674150206.gal : 19 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6519093872771189088.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1716083771674150206.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6519093872771189088.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,10.4055,256340,4290,135,312062,3806,729,1.83496e+06,100,24256,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!((((((((((AF((((((((i12.u16.BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(i6.u2.BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((i12.u38.BeginLoop_3_0_0==1)||(i12.u39.BeginLoop_2_0_0...20829
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((((i12.u16.BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(i6.u2.BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((i12.u38.BeginLoop_3_0_0==1)|...28829
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t36, t37, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149,...822
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 159 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13280643591062294949.gal : 22 ms
[2022-05-17 09:24:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15934247920173929149.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13280643591062294949.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15934247920173929149.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.4467,389676,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(EG((!(A((((((TestIdentity_1_2_1==1)||(TestIdentity_2_2_2==1))||((TestIdentity_0_2_0==1)||(TestIdentity_3_0_3==1)))||(((TestIdentity...2748
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),(!(!((E(!(((((((((Turn_0_1==1)&&(AskForSection_2_0==1))||((Turn_0_0==1)&&(AskForSection_1_0==...5443
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15397504703956637892.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15397504703956637892.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15397504703956637892.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15397504703956637892.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15397504703956637892.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 23 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2250126688290192277.gal : 19 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7473513946330524437.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2250126688290192277.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7473513946330524437.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,11.1622,286128,3832,156,432367,3311,724,1.56988e+06,95,24356,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(EG((!(A((((((i3.i0.u8.TestIdentity_1_2_1==1)||(i14.i0.u12.TestIdentity_2_2_2==1))||((i12.u66.TestIdentity_0_2_0==1)||(i8.i0.u13.Tes...3702
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),(!(!((E(!(((((((((i11.u17.Turn_0_1==1)&&(i11.u16.AskForSection_2_0==1))||((i11.u14.Turn_0_0==...9334
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t150, t151, t15...800
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,19.1387,363816,1,0,531059,3311,4554,2.23693e+06,588,24356,1442478
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:25:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:25:42] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 131 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:25:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4581446450382897752.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:25:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability594387646297319975.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4581446450382897752.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability594387646297319975.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.5667,389672,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(EG(!(((((((TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(Turn_2_3==1))||((TestTurn_2_0==1)&&(Turn_0_2==1)))||(((TestTurn_1_0==1)&&(Turn_0_1==1))||((TestTurn_...2414
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(Turn_2_3==1))||((TestTurn_2_0==1)&&(Turn_0_2...1681
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1466806939060131686.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1466806939060131686.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1466806939060131686.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1466806939060131686.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1466806939060131686.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 202 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 33 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13184138956792338833.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7573575549340421485.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13184138956792338833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7573575549340421485.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.2856,370032,3028,225,474362,9982,705,2.58923e+06,106,88092,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(EX(EG(!(((((((i7.u62.TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(i7.u62.Turn_2_3==1))||((i15.u23.TestTurn_2_0==1)&&(i15.u86.Turn_0_2==1)))||(((i15.u24.TestTur...3298
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((i7.u62.TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(i7.u62.Turn_2_3==1))||((i15.u23.TestT...5623
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t15...752
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 275 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 398 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 157 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8406080815661122486.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4601579194399798201.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8406080815661122486.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4601579194399798201.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,16.8277,421792,2,73296,5,1.12801e+06,6,0,1311,1.8281e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16777537951789897046.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16777537951789897046.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16777537951789897046.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16777537951789897046.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16777537951789897046.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 214 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 21 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17738514142820794911.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12920135808470185770.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17738514142820794911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12920135808470185770.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,6.02358,171148,3745,175,232296,6732,794,1.05627e+06,108,51456,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF(EX(AX(((((i7.u37.WantSection_3_F==1)&&(i7.u37.Idle_3==1))||((i2.i1.u32.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i7.u38.Idle_2==1)))||(((i12.i1.u30....264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U EX(!(EX(!(((((i7.u37.WantSection_3_F==1)&&(i7.u37.Idle_3==1))||((i2.i1.u32.WantSectio...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t15...839
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,17.5831,483960,1,0,468737,6732,4512,4.35203e+06,553,51456,1315045
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:27:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:27:31] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 84 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2211700935475795840.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:27:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7600579233274814938.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2211700935475795840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7600579233274814938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.5839,389868,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A(EF(AX((((((IsEndLoop_1_2_3==1)||(IsEndLoop_0_0_3==1))||((IsEndLoop_3_0_3==1)||(IsEndLoop_1_0_3==1)))||(((IsEndLoop_0_1_3==1)||(IsE...6522
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!((!(((!(((((((BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((BeginLoop_3_0_0==1)||(BeginLoop_2...18053
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15376336320086641790.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15376336320086641790.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15376336320086641790.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15376336320086641790.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15376336320086641790.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10902830379321787888.gal : 21 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4496227512963727150.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10902830379321787888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4496227512963727150.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,2.91051,89340,2192,241,132351,4945,691,421415,103,42931,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A(EF(AX((((((i4.u21.IsEndLoop_1_2_3==1)||(i3.u86.IsEndLoop_0_0_3==1))||((i7.u73.IsEndLoop_3_0_3==1)||(i3.u52.IsEndLoop_1_0_3==1)))||...8567
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!((!(((!(((((((i3.u57.BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(i10.i1.u58.BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((i3.u23.BeginLoo...24987
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t151, t152, t1...751
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 132 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14314578605619122180.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:28:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1953071935080413871.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14314578605619122180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1953071935080413871.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.7384,389872,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(A(E((((((((EG(((((((((WantSection_2_F==1)&&(TestAlone_3_1_2==1))||((WantSection_2_F==1)&&(TestAlone_0_2_2==1)))||(((WantSection_2_F==...9090
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(!(EX(!(((((((((TestTurn_3_1==1)&&(Turn_1_1==1))||((TestTurn_0_1==1)&&(Tur...11389
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:176)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:342)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:284)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:326)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:178)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:181)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:161)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:326)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:392)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:186)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16933923088439063167.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16933923088439063167.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16933923088439063167.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16933923088439063167.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16933923088439063167.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 218 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 50 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:29:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11717204011710390233.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability322897047989895678.ctl : 351 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11717204011710390233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability322897047989895678.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,16.4675,374660,2746,137,507025,7606,793,2.44922e+06,98,61626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(A(E((((((((EG(((((((((i8.i1.u50.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i4.i1.u37.TestAlone_3_1_2==1))||((i8.i1.u50.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i3.i1.u55.Tes...12943
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(!(EX(!(((((((((i11.u68.TestTurn_3_1==1)&&(i11.u70.Turn_1_1==1))||((i11.u6...17061
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t36, t37, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149,...839
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 244 transition count 330
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 242 transition count 282
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 194 transition count 282
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 194 transition count 274
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 186 transition count 274
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 180 transition count 268
Applied a total of 128 rules in 40 ms. Remains 180 /244 variables (removed 64) and now considering 268/332 (removed 64) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 180 cols
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 292 ms returned [169, 170, 171, 172]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 303 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/244 places, 268/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 176 /176 variables (removed 0) and now considering 268/268 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 176/244 places, 268/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6612997862494437364.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12290336210815482927.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6612997862494437364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12290336210815482927.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,942892,10.2356,279968,2,48981,5,696151,6,0,975,1.11208e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph878436232274402416.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph878436232274402416.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph878436232274402416.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph878436232274402416.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph878436232274402416.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 226 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 53 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10054555845184105961.gal : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4525712656701476680.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10054555845184105961.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4525712656701476680.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,942892,1.06571,38112,1882,328,53312,2386,614,141803,118,15504,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((((((EF((((i13.u56.EndTurn_0_2==1)||(i13.u15.EndTurn_2_2==1))||((i13.u58.EndTurn_3_2==1)||(i14.i1.u59.EndTurn_1_2==1)))) + (i7.u44.Be...1660
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((((((E(TRUE U (((i13.u56.EndTurn_0_2==1)||(i13.u15.EndTurn_2_2==1))||((i13.u58.EndTurn_3_2==1)||(i...1711
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t5, t6, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76, t77, t78, t79, t92, t102, t103, t104...625
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,2.78116,86540,1,0,140687,8289,3554,403055,677,39530,367660
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 96 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 96 transitions
Performed 96 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 96
Iterating post reduction 0 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 244 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 96 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 148 transition count 236
Performed 48 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 48 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 148 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 100 transition count 188
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 88 transition count 176
Applied a total of 312 rules in 11 ms. Remains 88 /244 variables (removed 156) and now considering 176/332 (removed 156) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 152 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 88 cols
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [81, 82, 83, 84]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/244 places, 176/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 84 /84 variables (removed 0) and now considering 176/176 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 84/244 places, 176/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
Finished random walk after 78 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 )
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 194 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability52022315443164862.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5688263667238910907.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability52022315443164862.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5688263667238910907.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...272
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.9158,389728,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5542148534370918218.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5542148534370918218.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5542148534370918218.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5542148534370918218.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5542148534370918218.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:30:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:30:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:30:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 222 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10320744569873803877.gal : 11 ms
[2022-05-17 09:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7839807621059392083.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10320744569873803877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7839807621059392083.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,3.96867,118572,2649,85,180455,3870,805,624127,66,21635,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((AX(!(EX((i9.i2.u70.TestIdentity_1_1_0==1)))) + AX(!((AX((i10.i1.u44.BeginLoop_0_2_2==1)) + EG(((i6.i1.u55.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i10....233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EX(!(!(EX((i9.i2.u70.TestIdentity_1_1_0==1)))))) + !(EX(!(!((!(EX(!((i10.i1.u44.BeginLoop_0_2...309
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t151, t1...891
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 95 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 95 transitions
Performed 95 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 95
Iterating post reduction 0 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 244 transition count 237
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 149 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 148 transition count 236
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 148 transition count 189
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 101 transition count 189
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 89 transition count 177
Applied a total of 310 rules in 19 ms. Remains 89 /244 variables (removed 155) and now considering 177/332 (removed 155) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 153 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 153 rows 89 cols
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 107 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/244 places, 177/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 85 /85 variables (removed 0) and now considering 177/177 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 85/244 places, 177/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 177 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13161076043139384341.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14767198935110932447.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13161076043139384341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14767198935110932447.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,67370,0.988734,40068,2,8476,5,105239,6,0,520,127060,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((IsEndLoop_1_2_0==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((IsEndLoop_1_2_0==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t48, t67, t68, t69, t90, t92,...617
(forward)formula 0,1,12.3923,365744,1,0,532,2.44447e+06,376,226,3680,1.40301e+06,472
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 93 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 93 transitions
Performed 93 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 93
Iterating post reduction 0 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 244 transition count 239
Reduce places removed 93 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 151 transition count 238
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 150 transition count 238
Performed 46 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 46 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 150 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 104 transition count 192
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 92 transition count 180
Applied a total of 304 rules in 9 ms. Remains 92 /244 variables (removed 152) and now considering 180/332 (removed 152) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 156 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 92 cols
[2022-05-17 09:31:19] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned [85, 86, 87, 88]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 238 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/244 places, 180/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 88 /88 variables (removed 0) and now considering 180/180 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 88/244 places, 180/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12508445373276436741.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10574903427046234056.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12508445373276436741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10574903427046234056.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,82274,1.05839,43816,2,9032,5,111108,6,0,535,143003,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((TestIdentity_0_0_2==0) * ((EF((IsEndLoop_0_1_1==0)) + (Turn_1_2==0)) + (AskForSection_3_1==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((TestIdentity_0_0_2==0) * ((E(TRUE U (IsEndLoop_0_1_1==0)) + (Turn_1_2==0)) + (AskFor...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t52, t71, t72, t73, t74, ...617
(forward)formula 0,0,20.1612,589732,1,0,640,3.33626e+06,390,321,3821,2.46788e+06,582
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 233 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2044455520613757359.gal : 10 ms
[2022-05-17 09:31:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3765864780562087702.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2044455520613757359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3765864780562087702.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.477,389700,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13449698596680328614.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13449698596680328614.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13449698596680328614.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13449698596680328614.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13449698596680328614.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 214 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:32:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability946383060351657673.gal : 374 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9119669145795497952.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability946383060351657673.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9119669145795497952.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...252
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,4.96524,137696,3718,164,210579,2617,789,752100,93,18515,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((((i12.i1.u44.BeginLoop_1_2_2==1)||(i11.u65.IsEndLoop_1_1_3==1)) * AG((i13.i0.u6.IsEndLoop_2_2_0==1))) + (i6.i2.u7.BeginLoop_3_2_1=...516
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U ((((i12.i1.u44.BeginLoop_1_2_2==1)||(i11.u65.IsEndLoop_1_1_3==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((i13.i0.u...899
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t36, t37, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149,...831
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,14.7797,330948,1,0,483891,3370,4541,1.93907e+06,505,18515,1321330
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 92 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 92 transitions
Performed 92 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 92
Iterating post reduction 0 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 244 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 92 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 152 transition count 239
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 151 transition count 239
Performed 48 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 48 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 151 transition count 191
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 103 transition count 191
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 91 transition count 179
Applied a total of 306 rules in 8 ms. Remains 91 /244 variables (removed 153) and now considering 179/332 (removed 153) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 155 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 91 cols
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned [84, 85, 86, 87]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 137 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/244 places, 179/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 87 /87 variables (removed 0) and now considering 179/179 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 87/244 places, 179/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18264092903365093187.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability522085891004518889.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18264092903365093187.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability522085891004518889.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,72948,1.00892,39800,2,8526,5,106370,6,0,530,126894,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((Turn_0_2==1)&&(AskForSection_2_0==1)) U E(((E(AG((BeginLoop_1_1_2==1)) U !(((TestTurn_1_2==1)&&(Turn_2_3==1)))) * (WantSection_2_T==1...234
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(FwdU(Init,((Turn_0_2==1)&&(AskForSection_2_0==1))),((E(!(E(TRUE U !((BeginLoop_1_1_2==1)))) U !(((Te...300
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 167/8/12
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t50, t69, t70, t71, t93, ...617
(forward)formula 0,1,5.30079,163852,1,0,456,784977,400,187,3940,718895,386
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6652589774872455057.gal : 153 ms
[2022-05-17 09:32:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability926109481495186602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6652589774872455057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability926109481495186602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.981,389952,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2977300095379464367.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2977300095379464367.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2977300095379464367.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2977300095379464367.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2977300095379464367.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17380539073721452705.gal : 22 ms
[2022-05-17 09:33:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16438552619271070455.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17380539073721452705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16438552619271070455.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,6.49078,160344,3179,194,221327,6351,721,875485,110,41894,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF(!(((i2.i1.u56.WantSection_1_T==1)&&(i1.i0.u75.TestAlone_0_1_1==1)))) * E(E(((i2.i1.u56.WantSection_1_F==1)&&(i13.u74.TestAlone_3_0_...721
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(!(((i2.i1.u56.WantSection_1_T==1)&&(i1.i0.u75.TestAlone_0_1_1==1)))))) * E(E(((i2.i1.u56....1490
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t15...799
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,16.0186,334788,1,0,498362,6351,4396,1.91532e+06,614,41894,1393513
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph684169348434963508.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph684169348434963508.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph684169348434963508.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph684169348434963508.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph684169348434963508.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18305157348830243217.gal : 14 ms
[2022-05-17 09:33:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2702709893401153702.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18305157348830243217.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2702709893401153702.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,9.25914,256364,4028,264,317405,7930,735,1.89359e+06,115,71534,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!((((((((((AF((((((((i6.u33.BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(i4.i1.u34.BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((i6.u32.BeginLoop_3_0_0==1)||(i6.u13.BeginLoop_2_0_...20764
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((((((i6.u33.BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(i4.i1.u34.BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((i6.u32.BeginLoop_3_0_0==1...28750
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t151, t1...753
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,0,185.921,2290548,1,0,2.23344e+06,8812,2237,1.992e+07,302,71534,3275327
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(E(EX(EG(!(((((((i8.u40.TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(i8.u37.Turn_2_3==1))||((i6.u29.TestTurn_2_0==1)&&(i6.u28.Turn_0_2==1)))||(((i6.u28.TestTurn_1...3267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((((((i8.u40.TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(i8.u37.Turn_2_3==1))||((i6.u29.TestTu...5566
(forward)formula 1,0,233.418,2507028,1,0,2.42272e+06,8812,2313,2.1972e+07,334,71534,1497175
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(!(A(EF(AX((((((i8.u41.IsEndLoop_1_2_3==1)||(i6.u7.IsEndLoop_0_0_3==1))||((i7.u53.IsEndLoop_3_0_3==1)||(i6.u28.IsEndLoop_1_0_3==1)))||(...8853
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!((!(((!(((((((i6.u33.BeginLoop_1_0_0==1)||(i4.i1.u34.BeginLoop_0_2_0==1))||((i6.u32.BeginLoop...25827
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 2,1,294.541,2507028,1,0,2.42272e+06,8812,3461,2.1972e+07,415,71534,3544432
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG(A(E((((((((EG(((((((((i1.i0.u23.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i2.u58.TestAlone_3_1_2==1))||((i1.i0.u23.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i4.i0.u57.TestAl...12568
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(!(EX(!(((((((((i2.u9.TestTurn_3_1==1)&&(i9.i1.u38.Turn_1_1==1))||((i0.u31...16524
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 3,0,308.383,2671764,1,0,2.64398e+06,14403,4469,2.24643e+07,463,120483,4551454
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: !(E((AX(!(EX((i9.i1.u36.TestIdentity_1_1_0==1)))) + AX(!((AX((i4.i0.u57.BeginLoop_0_2_2==1)) + EG(((i1.i0.u23.WantSection_2_F==1)&&(i4.i0...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EX(!(!(EX((i9.i1.u36.TestIdentity_1_1_0==1)))))) + !(EX(!(!((!(EX(!((i4.i0.u57.BeginLoop_0_2_...305
(forward)formula 4,0,414.84,2762844,1,0,2.71388e+06,14499,2347,2.34446e+07,348,122153,2726164
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1057220 ms.

BK_STOP 1652780414139

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-PT-3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-PT-3, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r168-tall-165277016100058"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-PT-3.tgz
mv Peterson-PT-3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;