Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r132-tall-165271821000498.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r132-tall-165271821000498
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 3.6M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K Apr 29 12:38 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Apr 29 12:38 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K Apr 29 12:38 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K Apr 29 12:38 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 9 08:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 9 08:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 9 08:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 9 08:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 9 08:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 9 08:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:34 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4M May 10 09:34 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652796467788

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-17 14:07:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-17 14:07:49] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-17 14:07:49] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 309 ms
[2022-05-17 14:07:49] [INFO ] Transformed 5622 places.
[2022-05-17 14:07:49] [INFO ] Transformed 5449 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:07:49] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 5622 places and 5449 transitions in 436 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 414 ms.
Support contains 147 out of 5622 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 5622/5622 places, 5449/5449 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1093 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1093 rules applied. Total rules applied 1093 place count 4529 transition count 5449
Discarding 1031 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1031 rule applications. Total rules 2124 place count 3498 transition count 4418
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1031 rules applied. Total rules applied 3155 place count 3498 transition count 4418
Discarding 945 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 945 rule applications. Total rules 4100 place count 2553 transition count 3473
Iterating global reduction 1 with 945 rules applied. Total rules applied 5045 place count 2553 transition count 3473
Discarding 922 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 922 rule applications. Total rules 5967 place count 1631 transition count 2551
Iterating global reduction 1 with 922 rules applied. Total rules applied 6889 place count 1631 transition count 2551
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 21 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 6910 place count 1610 transition count 2551
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 6929 place count 1591 transition count 2532
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 6948 place count 1591 transition count 2532
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 6966 place count 1573 transition count 2514
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 6984 place count 1573 transition count 2514
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 7002 place count 1555 transition count 2496
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 7020 place count 1555 transition count 2496
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 7038 place count 1537 transition count 2478
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 7056 place count 1537 transition count 2478
Discarding 253 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 253 rule applications. Total rules 7309 place count 1284 transition count 2225
Iterating global reduction 2 with 253 rules applied. Total rules applied 7562 place count 1284 transition count 2225
Applied a total of 7562 rules in 2166 ms. Remains 1284 /5622 variables (removed 4338) and now considering 2225/5449 (removed 3224) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:07:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1972 transitions (discarded 253 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1972 rows 1284 cols
[2022-05-17 14:07:52] [INFO ] Computed 81 place invariants in 79 ms
[2022-05-17 14:07:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 942 ms returned [25, 48, 75, 98, 123, 199, 238, 284, 333, 360, 387, 420, 502, 522, 576, 578, 605, 663, 706, 736, 783, 811, 833, 859, 915, 983, 1006, 1035, 1039, 1121, 1152, 1174, 1200, 1222]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 995 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 1250/5622 places, 2225/5449 transitions.
Discarding 419 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 419 rule applications. Total rules 419 place count 831 transition count 1806
Iterating global reduction 0 with 419 rules applied. Total rules applied 838 place count 831 transition count 1806
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 849 place count 820 transition count 1795
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 860 place count 820 transition count 1795
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 871 place count 809 transition count 1784
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 882 place count 809 transition count 1784
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 893 place count 798 transition count 1773
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 904 place count 798 transition count 1773
Discarding 70 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 70 rule applications. Total rules 974 place count 728 transition count 1703
Iterating global reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 1044 place count 728 transition count 1703
Applied a total of 1044 rules in 197 ms. Remains 728 /1250 variables (removed 522) and now considering 1703/2225 (removed 522) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:07:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1275 transitions (discarded 428 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1275 rows 728 cols
[2022-05-17 14:07:53] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:07:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 277 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:07:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1275 transitions (discarded 428 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1275 rows 728 cols
[2022-05-17 14:07:53] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-17 14:07:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1429 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 728/5622 places, 1703/5449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 728/5622 places, 1703/5449 transitions.
Support contains 147 out of 728 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 131 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1703 transitions.
Support contains 143 out of 728 places (down from 147) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 542 resets, run finished after 586 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 ) properties (out of 83) seen :63
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 20) seen :2
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 18) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 18) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 17) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 17) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 16) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 16) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 15) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 15) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 14) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 14 properties.
[2022-05-17 14:08:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1275 transitions (discarded 428 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1275 rows 728 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:01] [INFO ] Computed 47 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 47 generalized place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 14:08:03] [INFO ] After 749ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :12 real:1
[2022-05-17 14:08:04] [INFO ] After 1552ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :12 real:1
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 465 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:08:04] [INFO ] After 2537ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :12 real:1
[2022-05-17 14:08:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 47 generalized place invariants in 25 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 14:08:05] [INFO ] After 757ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :13
[2022-05-17 14:08:06] [INFO ] After 1621ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :13
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 509 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:08:07] [INFO ] After 2535ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :1 sat :13
Fused 14 Parikh solutions to 13 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 19 ms.
Support contains 26 out of 728 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 2258 edges and 728 vertex of which 290 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 438 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 438 places :
Also discarding 234 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 234 transitions
Drop transitions removed 181 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 181 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 192 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 290 transition count 1277
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 277 transition count 1273
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 273 transition count 1273
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 273 transition count 1256
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 256 transition count 1256
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 276 place count 228 transition count 1228
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 228 transition count 1228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 227 transition count 1227
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 227 transition count 1227
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 203 transition count 1203
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 21 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 203 transition count 1182
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 182 transition count 1182
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 23 times.
Drop transitions removed 23 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 182 transition count 1182
Applied a total of 419 rules in 164 ms. Remains 182 /728 variables (removed 546) and now considering 1182/1703 (removed 521) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 182/728 places, 1182/1703 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1759 resets, run finished after 383 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 ) properties (out of 13) seen :9
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 21 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=769 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 33 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 32 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=714 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 21 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=909 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
[2022-05-17 14:08:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 341 transitions (discarded 841 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 182 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 14:08:07] [INFO ] After 108ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2022-05-17 14:08:07] [INFO ] After 186ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 46 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:08:07] [INFO ] After 300ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 3 ms.
Support contains 13 out of 182 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 182/182 places, 1182/1182 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 702 edges and 182 vertex of which 126 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 56 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 56 places :
Also discarding 23 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 23 transitions
Drop transitions removed 28 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 28 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 126 transition count 1130
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 125 transition count 1130
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 118 transition count 1123
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 118 transition count 1123
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 117 transition count 1122
Applied a total of 47 rules in 65 ms. Remains 117 /182 variables (removed 65) and now considering 1122/1182 (removed 60) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 117/182 places, 1122/1182 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1856 resets, run finished after 462 ms. (steps per millisecond=21 ) properties (out of 4) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=833 ) properties (out of 4) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=476 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=833 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 37 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=833 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
[2022-05-17 14:08:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 184 transitions (discarded 938 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 117 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:08] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 18 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-17 14:08:08] [INFO ] After 47ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2022-05-17 14:08:08] [INFO ] After 89ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 25 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:08:08] [INFO ] After 154ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 117 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 1122/1122 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 390 edges and 117 vertex of which 105 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 12 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 12 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 105 transition count 1111
Applied a total of 10 rules in 21 ms. Remains 105 /117 variables (removed 12) and now considering 1111/1122 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 105/117 places, 1111/1122 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1736 resets, run finished after 205 ms. (steps per millisecond=48 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=625 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=666 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 42 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=769 ) properties (out of 3) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 58652 steps, run visited all 3 properties in 688 ms. (steps per millisecond=85 )
Probabilistic random walk after 58652 steps, saw 17276 distinct states, run finished after 688 ms. (steps per millisecond=85 ) properties seen :3
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-17 14:08:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 61 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1703 transitions.
Computed a total of 728 stabilizing places and 1703 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 728 transition count 1703
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 5 formulas.
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 80 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 80 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 648 transition count 1623
Iterating global reduction 0 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 648 transition count 1623
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 581 transition count 1556
Iterating global reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 581 transition count 1556
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 569 transition count 1556
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 357 place count 518 transition count 1505
Iterating global reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 518 transition count 1505
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 20 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 498 transition count 1505
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 491 place count 435 transition count 1442
Iterating global reduction 2 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 554 place count 435 transition count 1442
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 586 place count 403 transition count 1410
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 618 place count 403 transition count 1410
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 650 place count 371 transition count 1378
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 682 place count 371 transition count 1378
Discarding 102 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 102 rule applications. Total rules 784 place count 269 transition count 1276
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 886 place count 269 transition count 1276
Discarding 133 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 133 rule applications. Total rules 1019 place count 136 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 2 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 1152 place count 136 transition count 1143
Applied a total of 1152 rules in 84 ms. Remains 136 /728 variables (removed 592) and now considering 1143/1703 (removed 560) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 151 transitions (discarded 992 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 136 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned [29, 33, 41, 53, 57, 63, 71, 85, 89, 99, 105, 127]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 163 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/728 places, 1143/1703 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 95 transition count 1114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 95 transition count 1114
Applied a total of 58 rules in 6 ms. Remains 95 /124 variables (removed 29) and now considering 1114/1143 (removed 29) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 1003 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 95 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 1003 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 95 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 265 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/728 places, 1114/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 95/728 places, 1114/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1114 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9451432825722844296.gal : 12 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12593511286104834949.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9451432825722844296.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12593511286104834949.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,64707,2.58251,82048,2,9817,5,205966,6,0,1460,154753,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(AG((!(A(((Node20DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node32IsActive>=1)) U ((Node31HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode10>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSe...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(E(TRUE U !((!(!((E(!(((Node31HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode10>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNod...464
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t26, t27, t28...6516
(forward)formula 0,1,26.1923,708808,1,0,3458,3.40778e+06,2263,1219,9722,2.1891e+06,2417
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 3386 edges and 728 vertex of which 726 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 90 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 90 transitions
Performed 90 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 90
Iterating post reduction 0 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 726 transition count 1611
Reduce places removed 90 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 636 transition count 1610
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 635 transition count 1610
Performed 36 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 36 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 635 transition count 1574
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 599 transition count 1574
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 309 place count 545 transition count 1520
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 545 transition count 1520
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 380 place count 528 transition count 1503
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 528 transition count 1503
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 523 transition count 1503
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 523 transition count 1498
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 518 transition count 1498
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 424 place count 506 transition count 1486
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 436 place count 506 transition count 1486
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 441 place count 501 transition count 1481
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 501 transition count 1481
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 477 place count 470 transition count 1450
Iterating global reduction 4 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 508 place count 470 transition count 1450
Performed 80 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 668 place count 390 transition count 1370
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 703 place count 355 transition count 1335
Iterating global reduction 4 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 738 place count 355 transition count 1335
Applied a total of 738 rules in 194 ms. Remains 355 /728 variables (removed 373) and now considering 1335/1703 (removed 368) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 771 transitions (discarded 564 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 771 rows 355 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:38] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 270 ms returned [2, 19, 29, 37, 39, 46, 55, 68, 78, 86, 93, 104, 113, 120, 129, 133, 139, 147, 154, 161, 170, 172, 182, 193, 203, 226, 233, 244, 252, 254, 266, 276, 284, 286, 298, 300, 311, 322]
Discarding 38 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 277 ms to find 38 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/728 places, 1335/1703 transitions.
Discarding 162 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 162 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 155 transition count 1173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 162 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 155 transition count 1173
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 349 place count 130 transition count 1148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 130 transition count 1148
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 409 place count 95 transition count 1113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 95 transition count 1113
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 88 transition count 1106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 460 place count 86 transition count 1104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 86 transition count 1104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 464 place count 84 transition count 1102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 84 transition count 1102
Applied a total of 466 rules in 58 ms. Remains 84 /317 variables (removed 233) and now considering 1102/1335 (removed 233) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 1004 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 1004 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 231 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 84/728 places, 1102/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 84/728 places, 1102/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1102 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10038973539585980658.gal : 7 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2851050176240933342.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10038973539585980658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2851050176240933342.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,14871,0.259633,12820,2,1713,5,33881,6,0,1405,11811,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(((Node22HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode19>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsSentToNode22>=1)) U EF(((Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode23>=1...256
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((Node4WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode23>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode23>=1))...522
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t18, t27, t34, t37, t42, t47, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89...6410
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,4.19905,149620,1,0,3313,774575,2233,1150,9208,537151,2283
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 649 transition count 1624
Iterating global reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 649 transition count 1624
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 582 transition count 1557
Iterating global reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 582 transition count 1557
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 569 transition count 1557
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 356 place count 518 transition count 1506
Iterating global reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 518 transition count 1506
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 500 transition count 1506
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 485 place count 440 transition count 1446
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 545 place count 440 transition count 1446
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 576 place count 409 transition count 1415
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 409 transition count 1415
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 638 place count 378 transition count 1384
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 669 place count 378 transition count 1384
Discarding 107 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 107 rule applications. Total rules 776 place count 271 transition count 1277
Iterating global reduction 2 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 883 place count 271 transition count 1277
Discarding 120 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 120 rule applications. Total rules 1003 place count 151 transition count 1157
Iterating global reduction 2 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 1123 place count 151 transition count 1157
Applied a total of 1123 rules in 77 ms. Remains 151 /728 variables (removed 577) and now considering 1157/1703 (removed 546) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 181 transitions (discarded 976 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 151 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned [29, 33, 41, 57, 64, 72, 86, 103, 127, 133, 141]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/728 places, 1157/1703 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 108 transition count 1125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 108 transition count 1125
Applied a total of 64 rules in 6 ms. Remains 108 /140 variables (removed 32) and now considering 1125/1157 (removed 32) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 986 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 139 transitions (discarded 986 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 139 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/728 places, 1125/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 108/728 places, 1125/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1125 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2680515520853562188.gal : 9 ms
[2022-05-17 14:08:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1448604506832664169.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2680515520853562188.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1448604506832664169.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,95206,2.18851,77728,2,11366,5,247511,6,0,1523,138688,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode11>=1)&&(Node12WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode11>=1)) U !((!(EX((Node26HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode25...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode11>=1)&&(Node12WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode11>=1)))) * (Node2...368
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 1120/4/5
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t27, t28,...6366
(forward)formula 0,0,22.6668,651332,1,0,3398,2.86255e+06,2279,1181,10163,2.20478e+06,2381
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 3386 edges and 728 vertex of which 726 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 88 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 88 transitions
Performed 88 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 88
Iterating post reduction 0 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 726 transition count 1613
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 89 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 638 transition count 1612
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 637 transition count 1612
Performed 36 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 36 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 637 transition count 1576
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 601 transition count 1576
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 304 place count 548 transition count 1523
Iterating global reduction 3 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 548 transition count 1523
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 375 place count 530 transition count 1505
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 530 transition count 1505
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 525 transition count 1505
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 525 transition count 1500
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 520 transition count 1500
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 420 place count 508 transition count 1488
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 432 place count 508 transition count 1488
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 437 place count 503 transition count 1483
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 503 transition count 1483
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 473 place count 472 transition count 1452
Iterating global reduction 4 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 504 place count 472 transition count 1452
Performed 80 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 664 place count 392 transition count 1372
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 698 place count 358 transition count 1338
Iterating global reduction 4 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 732 place count 358 transition count 1338
Applied a total of 732 rules in 151 ms. Remains 358 /728 variables (removed 370) and now considering 1338/1703 (removed 365) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 774 transitions (discarded 564 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 774 rows 358 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:07] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 12 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 292 ms returned [2, 19, 30, 38, 40, 47, 56, 68, 78, 86, 106, 115, 122, 131, 135, 141, 149, 156, 174, 176, 186, 197, 207, 217, 229, 236, 245, 247, 257, 269, 279, 287, 289, 301, 303, 314, 325]
Discarding 37 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 294 ms to find 37 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 321/728 places, 1338/1703 transitions.
Discarding 159 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 159 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 162 transition count 1179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 159 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 162 transition count 1179
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 342 place count 138 transition count 1155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 138 transition count 1155
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 400 place count 104 transition count 1121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 104 transition count 1121
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 94 transition count 1111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 456 place count 92 transition count 1109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 92 transition count 1109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 460 place count 90 transition count 1107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 90 transition count 1107
Applied a total of 462 rules in 33 ms. Remains 90 /321 variables (removed 231) and now considering 1107/1338 (removed 231) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 987 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 90 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 987 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 90 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/728 places, 1107/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 90/728 places, 1107/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1107 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13582209236977692585.gal : 13 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9323942631437333146.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13582209236977692585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9323942631437333146.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,18369,0.830506,39284,2,7345,5,92553,6,0,1434,46130,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(!(((Node17HasTheLeafSetOfRxToReplaceNode27>=1)||((Node14DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node16IsActive>=1)))) U (AF(EG((Node22ManageTheBrea...313
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode24>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode24>=1)))))) * !(E(...570
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t18, t21, t28, t35, t38, t42, t44, t49, t57, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91...6421
(forward)formula 0,0,12.0846,372624,1,0,3402,1.73675e+06,2255,1194,9639,1.19083e+06,2402
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 3386 edges and 728 vertex of which 726 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 91 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 91 transitions
Performed 91 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 91
Iterating post reduction 0 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 726 transition count 1610
Reduce places removed 91 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 635 transition count 1610
Performed 36 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 36 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 635 transition count 1574
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 599 transition count 1574
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 544 transition count 1519
Iterating global reduction 2 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 544 transition count 1519
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 382 place count 527 transition count 1502
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 527 transition count 1502
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 521 transition count 1502
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 521 transition count 1496
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 515 transition count 1496
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 430 place count 502 transition count 1483
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 443 place count 502 transition count 1483
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 449 place count 496 transition count 1477
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 496 transition count 1477
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 492 place count 459 transition count 1440
Iterating global reduction 3 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 529 place count 459 transition count 1440
Performed 79 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 79 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 687 place count 380 transition count 1361
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 723 place count 344 transition count 1325
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 759 place count 344 transition count 1325
Applied a total of 759 rules in 119 ms. Remains 344 /728 variables (removed 384) and now considering 1325/1703 (removed 378) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 744 transitions (discarded 581 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 744 rows 344 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:20] [INFO ] Computed 41 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 234 ms returned [2, 19, 29, 37, 39, 46, 55, 67, 77, 85, 92, 103, 112, 119, 128, 132, 138, 146, 153, 160, 169, 171, 181, 192, 202, 214, 221, 230, 232, 240, 242, 266, 274, 276, 288, 290, 301, 312]
Discarding 38 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 236 ms to find 38 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/728 places, 1325/1703 transitions.
Discarding 171 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 171 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 135 transition count 1154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 171 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 135 transition count 1154
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 366 place count 111 transition count 1130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 111 transition count 1130
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 414 place count 87 transition count 1106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 87 transition count 1106
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 80 transition count 1099
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 454 place count 78 transition count 1097
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 78 transition count 1097
Applied a total of 456 rules in 28 ms. Remains 78 /306 variables (removed 228) and now considering 1097/1325 (removed 228) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 1006 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 78 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 1006 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 78 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 78/728 places, 1097/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 78/728 places, 1097/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1097 transitions.
Finished random walk after 94 steps, including 10 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=94 )
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 76 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 76 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 652 transition count 1627
Iterating global reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 652 transition count 1627
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 588 transition count 1563
Iterating global reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 588 transition count 1563
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 576 transition count 1563
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 341 place count 527 transition count 1514
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 527 transition count 1514
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 16 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 511 transition count 1514
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 464 place count 453 transition count 1456
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 522 place count 453 transition count 1456
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 550 place count 425 transition count 1428
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 578 place count 425 transition count 1428
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 606 place count 397 transition count 1400
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 397 transition count 1400
Discarding 98 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 98 rule applications. Total rules 732 place count 299 transition count 1302
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 830 place count 299 transition count 1302
Discarding 107 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 107 rule applications. Total rules 937 place count 192 transition count 1195
Iterating global reduction 2 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 1044 place count 192 transition count 1195
Applied a total of 1044 rules in 75 ms. Remains 192 /728 variables (removed 536) and now considering 1195/1703 (removed 508) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 268 transitions (discarded 927 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 268 rows 192 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 19 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [42, 58, 66, 80, 130, 138, 152, 156, 165, 171, 179]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/728 places, 1195/1703 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 140 transition count 1154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 140 transition count 1154
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 139 transition count 1153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 139 transition count 1153
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 138 transition count 1152
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 138 transition count 1152
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 137 transition count 1151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 137 transition count 1151
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 136 transition count 1150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 136 transition count 1150
Applied a total of 90 rules in 38 ms. Remains 136 /181 variables (removed 45) and now considering 1150/1195 (removed 45) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 199 transitions (discarded 951 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 136 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 199 transitions (discarded 951 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 136 cols
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 8 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 321 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 136/728 places, 1150/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 136/728 places, 1150/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1150 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15280462061996421278.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4144161016564748921.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15280462061996421278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4144161016564748921.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,175389,2.48476,89376,2,10503,5,263128,6,0,1660,209350,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(((EG(((Node19IsActive<1)||(Node25DontAnswerToAnyNode<1))) + !(A(((Node11HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode24>=1)&&(LeafSetOfRxIsS...621
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(((EG(((Node19IsActive<1)||(Node25DontAnswerToAnyNode<1))) + !(!((E(!(((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOf...1056
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t28, t29,...6275
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 61 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9448401041322493449.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9448401041322493449.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9448401041322493449.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9448401041322493449.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9448401041322493449.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1162 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 161 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 122 labels/synchronizations in 18 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4513977577146594762.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:09:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15461533803465825483.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4513977577146594762.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15461533803465825483.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,175389,2.44953,87880,1597,2233,69620,67573,481,320651,595,483053,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(((EG(((u1.Node19IsActive<1)||(u1.Node25DontAnswerToAnyNode<1))) + !(A(((i1.i1.u15.Node11HasAskedItsLeafSetToRxToReplaceNode24>=1)&...728
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(((EG(((u1.Node19IsActive<1)||(u1.Node25DontAnswerToAnyNode<1))) + !(!((E(!(((i4.u0.NoNodeManageTh...1225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t44, t52, t53, t58, t61, t63, t67, t76, t81, t83, t122, t126, t127, t132, t135, t137, t14...4500
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,17.2147,569056,1,0,369620,361634,4757,2.47606e+06,3911,4.77258e+06,733921
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 82 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 82 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 646 transition count 1621
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 646 transition count 1621
Discarding 69 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 69 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 577 transition count 1552
Iterating global reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 577 transition count 1552
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 564 transition count 1552
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 368 place count 511 transition count 1499
Iterating global reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 511 transition count 1499
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 20 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 441 place count 491 transition count 1499
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 505 place count 427 transition count 1435
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 569 place count 427 transition count 1435
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 602 place count 394 transition count 1402
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 394 transition count 1402
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 668 place count 361 transition count 1369
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 701 place count 361 transition count 1369
Discarding 109 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 109 rule applications. Total rules 810 place count 252 transition count 1260
Iterating global reduction 2 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 919 place count 252 transition count 1260
Discarding 133 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 133 rule applications. Total rules 1052 place count 119 transition count 1127
Iterating global reduction 2 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 1185 place count 119 transition count 1127
Applied a total of 1185 rules in 56 ms. Remains 119 /728 variables (removed 609) and now considering 1127/1703 (removed 576) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 118 transitions (discarded 1009 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned [29, 33, 41, 53, 57, 63, 71, 85, 89, 97, 103, 111]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/728 places, 1127/1703 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 84 transition count 1104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 84 transition count 1104
Applied a total of 46 rules in 6 ms. Remains 84 /107 variables (removed 23) and now considering 1104/1127 (removed 23) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 1020 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 1020 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 84 cols
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 84/728 places, 1104/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 84/728 places, 1104/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1104 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3118204485014117766.gal : 5 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14880589707353315312.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3118204485014117766.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14880589707353315312.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,41186,1.1094,40444,2,6505,5,94739,6,0,1406,56934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(TRUE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,1.12561,40444,1,0,6,94739,7,1,1945,56934,1
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 72 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 72 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 656 transition count 1631
Iterating global reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 656 transition count 1631
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 597 transition count 1572
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 597 transition count 1572
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 8 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 589 transition count 1572
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 312 place count 547 transition count 1530
Iterating global reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 547 transition count 1530
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 17 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 530 transition count 1530
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 425 place count 476 transition count 1476
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 479 place count 476 transition count 1476
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 504 place count 451 transition count 1451
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 529 place count 451 transition count 1451
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 554 place count 426 transition count 1426
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 579 place count 426 transition count 1426
Discarding 72 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 72 rule applications. Total rules 651 place count 354 transition count 1354
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 723 place count 354 transition count 1354
Discarding 112 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 112 rule applications. Total rules 835 place count 242 transition count 1242
Iterating global reduction 2 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 947 place count 242 transition count 1242
Applied a total of 947 rules in 73 ms. Remains 242 /728 variables (removed 486) and now considering 1242/1703 (removed 461) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 362 transitions (discarded 880 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 362 rows 242 cols
[2022-05-17 14:10:11] [INFO ] Computed 22 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [62, 74, 108, 112, 118, 141, 197, 201, 215, 226]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 152 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/728 places, 1242/1703 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 177 transition count 1187
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 177 transition count 1187
Applied a total of 110 rules in 6 ms. Remains 177 /232 variables (removed 55) and now considering 1187/1242 (removed 55) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 300 transitions (discarded 887 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 300 rows 177 cols
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 300 transitions (discarded 887 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 300 rows 177 cols
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 229 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 332 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 177/728 places, 1187/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 177/728 places, 1187/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1187 transitions.
Support contains 22 out of 177 places (down from 26) after GAL structural reductions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2508453913869099904.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17514319919211451800.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2508453913869099904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17514319919211451800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,390236,3.62312,123908,2,14556,5,280070,6,0,1861,425287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(EF(!(EF(((Node11DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node13IsActive>=1)))))) * ((!(E(EF(!(((Node19IsActive>=1)&&(Node32DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))))...940
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((Node11DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(Node13IsActive>=1)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(((In...1659
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t29,...6371
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6967522890420242438.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6967522890420242438.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6967522890420242438.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6967522890420242438.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6967522890420242438.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1325 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 108 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9633213355237383681.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 14:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3883546823404681918.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9633213355237383681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3883546823404681918.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,390236,8.61364,288560,4036,3969,214458,109890,718,2.21029e+06,597,734099,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(EF(!(EF(((u15.Node11DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(u15.Node13IsActive>=1)))))) * ((!(E(EF(!(((i6.i1.u26.Node19IsActive>=1)&&(u3.Node32DontA...1100
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((u15.Node11DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1)&&(u15.Node13IsActive>=1)))))] = FALSE * [((F...1907
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t11, t14, t20, t22, t23, t25, t30, t32, t33, t37, t44, t48, t51, t61, t62, t68, t70, ...4685
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 3386 edges and 728 vertex of which 726 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions removed 81 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 81 transitions
Performed 81 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 81
Iterating post reduction 0 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 726 transition count 1620
Reduce places removed 81 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 645 transition count 1618
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 643 transition count 1618
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 643 transition count 1584
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 609 transition count 1584
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 284 place count 560 transition count 1535
Iterating global reduction 3 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 560 transition count 1535
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 349 place count 544 transition count 1519
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 544 transition count 1519
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 539 transition count 1519
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 539 transition count 1514
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 534 transition count 1514
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 387 place count 527 transition count 1507
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 527 transition count 1507
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 406 place count 515 transition count 1495
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 515 transition count 1495
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 447 place count 486 transition count 1466
Iterating global reduction 4 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 476 place count 486 transition count 1466
Performed 80 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 406 transition count 1386
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 669 place count 373 transition count 1353
Iterating global reduction 4 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 702 place count 373 transition count 1353
Applied a total of 702 rules in 107 ms. Remains 373 /728 variables (removed 355) and now considering 1353/1703 (removed 350) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 791 transitions (discarded 562 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 791 rows 373 cols
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Computed 42 place invariants in 11 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 300 ms returned [2, 19, 29, 39, 46, 55, 79, 87, 94, 105, 114, 121, 130, 145, 151, 159, 175, 185, 201, 212, 237, 255, 257, 265, 267, 279, 292, 300, 302, 314, 318, 329, 340]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 302 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 340/728 places, 1353/1703 transitions.
Discarding 158 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 158 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 182 transition count 1195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 182 transition count 1195
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 336 place count 162 transition count 1175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 162 transition count 1175
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 385 place count 133 transition count 1146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 133 transition count 1146
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 121 transition count 1134
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 440 place count 119 transition count 1132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 119 transition count 1132
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 443 place count 118 transition count 1131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 118 transition count 1131
Applied a total of 444 rules in 30 ms. Remains 118 /340 variables (removed 222) and now considering 1131/1353 (removed 222) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 210 transitions (discarded 921 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 118 cols
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 210 transitions (discarded 921 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 118 cols
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 310 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 118/728 places, 1131/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 118/728 places, 1131/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1131 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13622387919207538981.gal : 6 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3459425554124701286.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13622387919207538981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3459425554124701286.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,64269,2.67563,93492,2,20078,5,219683,6,0,1570,152265,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG((EG(((Node2IsActive>=1)&&(Node12DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + EG(((Node17HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSe...768
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((EG(((Node2IsActive>=1)&&(Node12DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + EG(((Node17HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxT...1231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t18, t19, t35, t38, t47, t48, t52, t59, t60, t63, t74, t82, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108...6491
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 14:11:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 14:11:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2615650153964094771.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2615650153964094771.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2615650153964094771.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2615650153964094771.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2615650153964094771.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 14:11:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 14:11:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 14:11:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1195 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 98 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:11:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5838863409839843513.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12530284897771530462.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5838863409839843513.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12530284897771530462.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,64269,1.38797,54932,2147,4628,40414,83907,464,119931,576,159061,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG((EG(((u0.Node2IsActive>=1)&&(u0.Node12DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + EG(((i6.i0.u8.Node17HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode2>=1)&&(...875
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((EG(((u0.Node2IsActive>=1)&&(u0.Node12DontAnswerToAnyNode>=1))) + EG(((i6.i0.u8.Node17HasAsked...1386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t18, t41, t47, t74, t82, t119, t143, t145, t164, t169, t173, t178, t183, t245, t253, t255, t3...4652
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,10.5366,341740,1,0,308304,313852,4096,1.0074e+06,3995,1.41448e+06,1605736
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 75 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 75 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 653 transition count 1628
Iterating global reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 653 transition count 1628
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 589 transition count 1564
Iterating global reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 589 transition count 1564
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 577 transition count 1564
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 339 place count 528 transition count 1515
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 528 transition count 1515
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 18 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 510 transition count 1515
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 460 place count 456 transition count 1461
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 514 place count 456 transition count 1461
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 544 place count 426 transition count 1431
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 574 place count 426 transition count 1431
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 604 place count 396 transition count 1401
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 396 transition count 1401
Discarding 100 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 100 rule applications. Total rules 734 place count 296 transition count 1301
Iterating global reduction 2 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 834 place count 296 transition count 1301
Discarding 119 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 119 rule applications. Total rules 953 place count 177 transition count 1182
Iterating global reduction 2 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 1072 place count 177 transition count 1182
Applied a total of 1072 rules in 63 ms. Remains 177 /728 variables (removed 551) and now considering 1182/1703 (removed 521) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 241 transitions (discarded 941 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 177 cols
[2022-05-17 14:11:54] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [32, 36, 71, 75, 81, 89, 114, 129, 137, 157]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 149 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 167/728 places, 1182/1703 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 130 transition count 1145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 130 transition count 1145
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 129 transition count 1144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 129 transition count 1144
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 128 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 128 transition count 1143
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 127 transition count 1142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 127 transition count 1142
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 125 transition count 1140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 125 transition count 1140
Applied a total of 84 rules in 17 ms. Remains 125 /167 variables (removed 42) and now considering 1140/1182 (removed 42) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 965 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 125 cols
[2022-05-17 14:11:54] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 965 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 125 cols
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 286 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 125/728 places, 1140/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 125/728 places, 1140/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1140 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4521217121372254567.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:11:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3107573830501753437.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4521217121372254567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3107573830501753437.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,122327,1.88899,74980,2,9916,5,159603,6,0,1606,143532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E((AX((Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode21>=1)) * E((Node28HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode2>=1) U (LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode18>=1))) U...549
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((E(TRUE U ((Node1WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode6>...618
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t27,...6071
(forward)formula 0,0,13.5775,392868,1,0,3307,1.55754e+06,2315,1173,11040,1.32573e+06,2343
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 80 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 80 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 648 transition count 1623
Iterating global reduction 0 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 648 transition count 1623
Discarding 67 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 67 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 581 transition count 1556
Iterating global reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 581 transition count 1556
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 13 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 568 transition count 1556
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 359 place count 516 transition count 1504
Iterating global reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 516 transition count 1504
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 20 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 496 transition count 1504
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 488 place count 439 transition count 1447
Iterating global reduction 2 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 545 place count 439 transition count 1447
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 578 place count 406 transition count 1414
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 611 place count 406 transition count 1414
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 644 place count 373 transition count 1381
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 677 place count 373 transition count 1381
Discarding 109 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 109 rule applications. Total rules 786 place count 264 transition count 1272
Iterating global reduction 2 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 895 place count 264 transition count 1272
Discarding 133 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 133 rule applications. Total rules 1028 place count 131 transition count 1139
Iterating global reduction 2 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 1161 place count 131 transition count 1139
Applied a total of 1161 rules in 52 ms. Remains 131 /728 variables (removed 597) and now considering 1139/1703 (removed 564) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 992 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 131 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Computed 14 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned [31, 43, 64, 68, 74, 82, 96, 100, 108, 114, 122]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/728 places, 1139/1703 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 94 transition count 1113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 94 transition count 1113
Applied a total of 52 rules in 5 ms. Remains 94 /120 variables (removed 26) and now considering 1113/1139 (removed 26) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 1002 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 94 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 111 transitions (discarded 1002 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 94 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/728 places, 1113/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 94/728 places, 1113/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1113 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5526530928140505890.gal : 4 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability678844342211308865.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5526530928140505890.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability678844342211308865.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,60792,1.11544,41284,2,6569,5,107694,6,0,1455,63148,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((EX(EF(((Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode28>=1)&&(LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7>=1)))) + ((NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode3>=1)&&(Node7W...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX((EX(E(TRUE U ((Node2ManageTheBreakDownOfNode28>=1)&&(LxHasReceivedTheRequestOfNode7>=1)))) + ...364
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t27, t28...6358
(forward)formula 0,1,10.1536,314432,1,0,3299,1.04246e+06,2257,1128,9900,934477,2273
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 78 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 78 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 650 transition count 1625
Iterating global reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 650 transition count 1625
Discarding 65 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 65 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 585 transition count 1560
Iterating global reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 585 transition count 1560
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 11 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 574 transition count 1560
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 346 place count 525 transition count 1511
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 525 transition count 1511
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 19 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 506 transition count 1511
Discarding 61 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 61 rule applications. Total rules 475 place count 445 transition count 1450
Iterating global reduction 2 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 536 place count 445 transition count 1450
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 566 place count 415 transition count 1420
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 596 place count 415 transition count 1420
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 626 place count 385 transition count 1390
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 656 place count 385 transition count 1390
Discarding 94 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 94 rule applications. Total rules 750 place count 291 transition count 1296
Iterating global reduction 2 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 844 place count 291 transition count 1296
Discarding 126 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 126 rule applications. Total rules 970 place count 165 transition count 1170
Iterating global reduction 2 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 1096 place count 165 transition count 1170
Applied a total of 1096 rules in 54 ms. Remains 165 /728 variables (removed 563) and now considering 1170/1703 (removed 533) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 210 transitions (discarded 960 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 165 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [29, 33, 41, 53, 57, 63, 85, 99, 103, 125, 131, 154]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 125 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/728 places, 1170/1703 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 114 transition count 1131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 114 transition count 1131
Applied a total of 78 rules in 5 ms. Remains 114 /153 variables (removed 39) and now considering 1131/1170 (removed 39) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 971 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 114 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 971 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 114 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 272 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 114/728 places, 1131/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 114/728 places, 1131/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1131 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10328392017808643471.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2261322892402599000.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10328392017808643471.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2261322892402599000.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,122242,6.93314,208424,2,18151,5,406880,6,0,1553,423629,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(A((A(((Node17HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode9>=1)&&(LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode17>=1)) U (Node25HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3>=1)...350
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((E(!((Node31ManageTheBreakDownOfNode25>=1)) U (!((!((E(!((Node25HasTheLeafSetOfLxToReplaceNode3...621
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t26, t27, t28...6539
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16764745020824680467.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16764745020824680467.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16764745020824680467.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16764745020824680467.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16764745020824680467.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1119 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 116 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14635474387435897984.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12839166035596953216.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14635474387435897984.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12839166035596953216.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,122242,0.656324,31124,859,1432,33886,16463,311,162556,701,28440,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(A((A(((i4.i0.u8.Node17HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode9>=1)&&(i4.i0.u9.LeafSetOfLxIsSentToNode17>=1)) U (i4.i0.u12.Node25HasTheL...414
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((E(!((i2.i0.u15.Node31ManageTheBreakDownOfNode25>=1)) U (!((!((E(!((i4.i0.u12.Node25HasTheLeafS...725
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t33, t39, t40, t354, t520, t577, t579, t589, t593, t601, t607, t608, t692, t853, t857, t...4477
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,5.08238,204052,1,0,148022,183316,3842,1.42297e+06,4294,532953,387332
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 76 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 76 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 652 transition count 1627
Iterating global reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 652 transition count 1627
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 589 transition count 1564
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 589 transition count 1564
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 577 transition count 1564
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 339 place count 528 transition count 1515
Iterating global reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 528 transition count 1515
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 17 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 511 transition count 1515
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 464 place count 452 transition count 1456
Iterating global reduction 2 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 523 place count 452 transition count 1456
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 552 place count 423 transition count 1427
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 581 place count 423 transition count 1427
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 610 place count 394 transition count 1398
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 639 place count 394 transition count 1398
Discarding 98 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 98 rule applications. Total rules 737 place count 296 transition count 1300
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 835 place count 296 transition count 1300
Discarding 114 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 114 rule applications. Total rules 949 place count 182 transition count 1186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 1063 place count 182 transition count 1186
Applied a total of 1063 rules in 61 ms. Remains 182 /728 variables (removed 546) and now considering 1186/1703 (removed 517) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 943 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 182 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned [29, 47, 56, 82, 86, 94, 103, 142, 146, 156, 162, 170]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 131 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/728 places, 1186/1703 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 128 transition count 1144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 128 transition count 1144
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 127 transition count 1143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 127 transition count 1143
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 126 transition count 1142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 126 transition count 1142
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 125 transition count 1141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 125 transition count 1141
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 124 transition count 1140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 124 transition count 1140
Applied a total of 92 rules in 13 ms. Remains 124 /170 variables (removed 46) and now considering 1140/1186 (removed 46) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 173 transitions (discarded 967 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 173 transitions (discarded 967 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 124 cols
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Computed 6 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 283 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 124/728 places, 1140/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 124/728 places, 1140/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1140 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16191618745013222083.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:12:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8087691529822784424.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16191618745013222083.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8087691529822784424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,133967,2.0925,67976,2,9214,5,159011,6,0,1602,128584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((((Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1))||(Node20HasAskedItsLeafSetToLxToReplaceNode1<...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((((Node3WantsToManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1)&&(NoNodeManageTheBreakDownOfNode17>=1))||(Node20Ha...506
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t26, t27, t28...6398
(forward)formula 0,0,23.794,667892,1,0,3433,2.83237e+06,2306,1199,10736,2.34818e+06,2411
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 728/728 places, 1703/1703 transitions.
Discarding 77 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 77 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 651 transition count 1626
Iterating global reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 651 transition count 1626
Discarding 65 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 65 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 586 transition count 1561
Iterating global reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 586 transition count 1561
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 12 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 574 transition count 1561
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 347 place count 523 transition count 1510
Iterating global reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 523 transition count 1510
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 19 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 504 transition count 1510
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 479 place count 442 transition count 1448
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 541 place count 442 transition count 1448
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 572 place count 411 transition count 1417
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 603 place count 411 transition count 1417
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 634 place count 380 transition count 1386
Iterating global reduction 2 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 665 place count 380 transition count 1386
Discarding 101 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 101 rule applications. Total rules 766 place count 279 transition count 1285
Iterating global reduction 2 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 867 place count 279 transition count 1285
Discarding 127 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 127 rule applications. Total rules 994 place count 152 transition count 1158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 1121 place count 152 transition count 1158
Applied a total of 1121 rules in 64 ms. Remains 152 /728 variables (removed 576) and now considering 1158/1703 (removed 545) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:13:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 184 transitions (discarded 974 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 152 cols
[2022-05-17 14:13:20] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned [31, 35, 43, 55, 59, 87, 107, 116, 127, 133, 142]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 121 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/728 places, 1158/1703 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 112 transition count 1129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 112 transition count 1129
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 111 transition count 1128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 111 transition count 1128
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 110 transition count 1127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 110 transition count 1127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 109 transition count 1126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 109 transition count 1126
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 107 transition count 1124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 107 transition count 1124
Applied a total of 68 rules in 20 ms. Remains 107 /141 variables (removed 34) and now considering 1124/1158 (removed 34) transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:13:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 126 transitions (discarded 998 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-17 14:13:20] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 126 transitions (discarded 998 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 107 cols
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 107/728 places, 1124/1703 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 107/728 places, 1124/1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1124 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12044201541205484621.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12710263443468673230.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12044201541205484621.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12710263443468673230.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,68631,0.917042,39684,2,7606,5,84997,6,0,1518,50751,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((Node24ManageTheBreakDownOfNode8>=1)) + EG(EF(((Node8DontAnswerToAnyNode<1)||(Node13IsActive<1))))) + A((((!(AX(((Node16WantsToManag...552
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !(!((E(!((Node1ManageTheBreakDownOfNode26>=1)) U (!((((!(!(EX(!(((Node16WantsToManageTheBreakDown...746
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t27,...6199
(forward)formula 0,1,13.9854,443112,1,0,3291,1.64303e+06,2278,1140,10265,1.33906e+06,2303
FORMULA LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2-CTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16995471100159455835.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16995471100159455835.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16995471100159455835.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16995471100159455835.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16995471100159455835.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2151 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:13:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 97 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 96 labels/synchronizations in 48 ms.
[2022-05-17 14:13:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9607459804724009407.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-17 14:13:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11737898140715705714.ctl : 275 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9607459804724009407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11737898140715705714.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 14:35:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 223 ms
[2022-05-17 14:35:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18094821058666799565.gal : 31 ms
[2022-05-17 14:35:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2852441386157940642.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18094821058666799565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2852441386157940642.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.49366e+06,380.706,7386144,2,491028,5,1.43878e+07,6,0,4580,4.73467e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-17 14:57:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 238 ms
[2022-05-17 14:57:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1703 transitions.
[2022-05-17 14:57:45] [INFO ] Transformed 728 places.
[2022-05-17 14:57:45] [INFO ] Transformed 1703 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2022-05-17 14:57:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8013890124201526462.gal : 15 ms
[2022-05-17 14:57:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1488115691406553848.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8013890124201526462.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1488115691406553848.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...319
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r132-tall-165271821000498"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2.tgz
mv LeafsetExtension-PT-S32C2 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;