fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
Execution of r078-tall-165260109900170
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DoubleExponent-PT-002

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
390.668 41635.00 61700.00 668.70 FFFFFTTTTFTFTFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r078-tall-165260109900170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r078-tall-165260109900170
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 260K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K Apr 29 13:48 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K Apr 29 13:48 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Apr 29 13:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 29 13:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:41 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 9 07:41 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 07:41 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 9 07:41 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 9 07:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652638192976

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 68 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Transformed 110 places.
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Transformed 98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 110 places and 98 transitions in 164 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 79 out of 110 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 106 transition count 98
Applied a total of 4 rules in 13 ms. Remains 106 /110 variables (removed 4) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 300 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 87 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 106/110 places, 98/98 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 106 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 335 resets, run finished after 618 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 71) seen :29
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=29 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 26 resets, run finished after 39 ms. (steps per millisecond=25 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 25 resets, run finished after 26 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 25 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 32 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 25 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 26 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 31 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 28 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 30 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 31 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 27 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 29 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 42 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:56] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 135ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :6 sat :11 real:25
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 50 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 309ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :6 sat :10 real:26
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 63 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 930ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :6 sat :10 real:26
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:57] [INFO ] After 198ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :11 sat :31
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 88 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] After 598ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :11 sat :31
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 166 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:58] [INFO ] After 972ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :11 sat :31
Fused 42 Parikh solutions to 30 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 350 ms.
Support contains 41 out of 106 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 106 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 103 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 101 transition count 93
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 101 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 98 transition count 90
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 88 transition count 80
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 87 transition count 80
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 87 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 82 transition count 75
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 82 transition count 75
Applied a total of 50 rules in 25 ms. Remains 82 /106 variables (removed 24) and now considering 75/98 (removed 23) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 82/106 places, 75/98 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 726 resets, run finished after 278 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 ) properties (out of 31) seen :11
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 53 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=47 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 63 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 56 resets, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 51 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 57 resets, run finished after 24 ms. (steps per millisecond=41 ) properties (out of 20) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 ) properties (out of 20) seen :7
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 54 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 61 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 50 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 60 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 55 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 59 resets, run finished after 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 13) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 13 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 82 cols
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 41ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :4 real:9
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:10
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 42ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:10
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 12 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 165ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:10
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 71ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 55ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 147ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 54 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:09:59] [INFO ] After 340ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :13
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 183 ms.
Support contains 17 out of 82 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 82/82 places, 75/75 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 82 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 66
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 71 transition count 64
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 65 transition count 58
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 65 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 64 transition count 57
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 64 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 61 transition count 54
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 61 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 60 transition count 53
Applied a total of 44 rules in 15 ms. Remains 60 /82 variables (removed 22) and now considering 53/75 (removed 22) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 60/82 places, 53/75 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1053 resets, run finished after 226 ms. (steps per millisecond=44 ) properties (out of 13) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 729 resets, run finished after 155 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 730 resets, run finished after 157 ms. (steps per millisecond=63 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 710 resets, run finished after 184 ms. (steps per millisecond=54 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 730 resets, run finished after 146 ms. (steps per millisecond=68 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 706 resets, run finished after 169 ms. (steps per millisecond=59 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 736 resets, run finished after 155 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 730 resets, run finished after 165 ms. (steps per millisecond=60 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 737 resets, run finished after 154 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 723 resets, run finished after 162 ms. (steps per millisecond=61 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 729 resets, run finished after 148 ms. (steps per millisecond=67 ) properties (out of 12) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 719 resets, run finished after 169 ms. (steps per millisecond=59 ) properties (out of 12) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 752 resets, run finished after 150 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 11 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :3 real:8
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 15ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 105ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 54ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 54ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 109ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 34 ms.
[2022-05-15 18:10:02] [INFO ] After 265ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 116 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 53/53 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 52
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 59 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 58 transition count 51
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 58 transition count 51
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 58 /60 variables (removed 2) and now considering 51/53 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 58/60 places, 51/53 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1119 resets, run finished after 192 ms. (steps per millisecond=52 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 754 resets, run finished after 132 ms. (steps per millisecond=75 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 769 resets, run finished after 130 ms. (steps per millisecond=76 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 756 resets, run finished after 135 ms. (steps per millisecond=74 ) properties (out of 11) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 732 resets, run finished after 127 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 ) properties (out of 11) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 766 resets, run finished after 123 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 756 resets, run finished after 119 ms. (steps per millisecond=84 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 735 resets, run finished after 127 ms. (steps per millisecond=78 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 759 resets, run finished after 123 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 746 resets, run finished after 122 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 778 resets, run finished after 120 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 10) seen :0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 2616 steps, run visited all 10 properties in 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 )
Probabilistic random walk after 2616 steps, saw 1334 distinct states, run finished after 52 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties seen :10
Successfully simplified 11 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 106 places (down from 70) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 173 edges and 106 vertex of which 104 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10595494014149785996.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7555782759373133839.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10595494014149785996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7555782759373133839.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.111369,9128,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(EF(AG(((p29>=1)||((p13>=1)&&(p34>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p29>=1)||((p13>=1)&&(p34>=1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,1.02294,44788,1,0,179,129193,216,101,3049,78887,205
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 105 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 83 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 74
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 78 transition count 70
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 64 transition count 56
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 64 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 63 transition count 55
Applied a total of 84 rules in 22 ms. Remains 63 /106 variables (removed 43) and now considering 55/98 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 63 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/106 places, 55/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 147 edges and 62 vertex of which 61 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 60 transition count 53
Applied a total of 3 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /62 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 60 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 60/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 60/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8252982744177238933.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17969181338590414732.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8252982744177238933.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17969181338590414732.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2208,0.057318,6792,2,1255,5,9160,6,0,296,9265,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG((((p69>=1)&&(p84>=1))||(p39>=1))) * (p107>=1)) * (p95>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG((((p69>=1)&&(p84>=1))||(p39>=1))) * (p107>=1)) * (p95>=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t6, t12, t14, t19, t21, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t31, t33, t35, t39, t42, t43, t5...256
(forward)formula 0,0,0.419516,23256,1,0,592,80855,130,57,1895,73583,584
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [73]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 105/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7469957606486298020.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18001775795072630301.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7469957606486298020.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18001775795072630301.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.07517,7612,2,3218,5,12616,6,0,520,10444,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG((p47<1)) * E(AF(((EG(((p57>=1)&&(p81>=1))) + ((p71>=1)&&(p96>=1))) + (p86>=1))) U !((!(A(((p104>=1)&&(p30>=1)) U (p98>=1))) + EF((...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU((EY(Init) * EG((p47<1))),!(EG(!(((EG(((p57>=1)&&(p81>=1))) + ((p71>=1)&&(p96>=1))) + (p86>=1)))))) * !(...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t17, t23, t30, t36, t43, t46, t53, t57, t58, t63, t66, t69, t70, t76, t82, t83, t86,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,3.24531,120492,1,0,1619,658388,245,439,3163,526532,1722
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16114190298026377485.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11958524465832722168.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16114190298026377485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11958524465832722168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.103003,9400,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(EX(((p56>=1)&&(p75>=1))))) U EX(EF(AG((p79>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p79>=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p79>=1))))))) U (!...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,2.37902,92332,1,0,1158,383578,219,153,3102,291809,1217
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2114646772611223149.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2888436897783961730.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2114646772611223149.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2888436897783961730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.103902,9256,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.107696,9256,1,0,7,18582,7,1,663,16252,2
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1601139828077730293.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5761744407771729088.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1601139828077730293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5761744407771729088.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.1037,9348,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((p2>=1) + (AX(E((p20>=1) U (p27>=1))) * EF(EG(((p24>=1)&&(p49>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * (p2>=1))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E((p20>=1) U (p27>=1)))))),TRUE),((p24>=1)&&(p4...173
(forward)formula 0,1,0.107278,9724,1,0,6,18582,8,0,660,16252,2
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12202302816129273210.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5840633487759034016.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12202302816129273210.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5840633487759034016.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.102685,9464,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((AG(((p22<1)||(p37<1))) + A(AG((p4>=1)) U EX((p80>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((p22<1)||(p37<1))))) + !((E(!(EX((p80>=1))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !((p4>=1))))) * !(E...208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,3.24123,124080,1,0,1350,578411,228,331,3258,493747,1391
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14497032984844945256.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4478754492682214593.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14497032984844945256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4478754492682214593.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.112523,9228,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AF(AX(((p40>=1)&&(p8>=1)))) * EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p40>=1)&&(p8>=1)))))))) * EX(TRUE))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,1.88024,77436,1,0,1066,264188,219,107,2973,229776,1093
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 105 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 74
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 82 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 78 transition count 70
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 63 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 62 transition count 54
Applied a total of 85 rules in 13 ms. Remains 62 /106 variables (removed 44) and now considering 54/98 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 62 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/106 places, 54/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 142 edges and 60 vertex of which 59 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 59 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 58 transition count 52
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 56 transition count 50
Applied a total of 7 rules in 7 ms. Remains 56 /60 variables (removed 4) and now considering 50/54 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 56 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 56 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 56/106 places, 50/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 56/106 places, 50/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1788372003670938802.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15185503662741881934.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1788372003670938802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15185503662741881934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2182,0.038797,6200,2,1407,5,6831,6,0,277,6056,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p53<1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p53<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.302166,17992,1,0,456,63208,18,4,1436,47447,453
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9562288624182784728.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16885257783696364969.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9562288624182784728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16885257783696364969.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.111616,9336,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG((((p107>=1)&&(p95>=1))&&(p23<1))) + E(!(((p10>=1)&&(p28>=1))) U EF((p1>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p107>=1)&&(p95>=1))&&(p23<1))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(FwdU(EY(Init),!(((p10>=1)&&(p...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 89/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,1.09343,47204,1,0,181,135765,226,101,3356,90070,211
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 106 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 86 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 84 transition count 76
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 84 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 80 transition count 72
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 65 transition count 57
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 65 transition count 57
Applied a total of 84 rules in 16 ms. Remains 65 /106 variables (removed 41) and now considering 57/98 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 65 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [43, 44]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/106 places, 57/98 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 150 edges and 63 vertex of which 62 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 62 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 61 transition count 55
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 59 transition count 53
Applied a total of 7 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /63 variables (removed 4) and now considering 53/57 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 59 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 59 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 59/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 59/106 places, 53/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2158821713728382488.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16364567433877488588.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2158821713728382488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16364567433877488588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2215,0.038622,5928,2,1688,5,6537,6,0,291,5359,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG((AF((p44<1)) * EG((p44<1)))) + ((p8>=1)&&(p97>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((p44<1)))) * EG((p44<1)))))) + ((p8>=1)&&(p97>=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t6, t13, t18, t20, t23, t24, t26, t28, t30, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t46, t51, t5...256
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,0.721704,35696,1,0,684,166707,137,131,1899,143035,697
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15651178878963781484.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability572066057397796799.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15651178878963781484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability572066057397796799.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.112242,9336,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(AG(EF((p3>=1)))) U AX(!(AF(((p27<1)||(((p68>=1)&&(p58>=1))&&(p90>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p3>=1))))))) * !(EX(!(!(!(EG(!(((p27<1)||(((p68>=1)&&(p58>=1))&&(p90>=1)))...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,2.00951,80020,1,0,1066,277385,226,107,3115,238401,1103
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12433771850327555800.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9568492791815154330.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12433771850327555800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9568492791815154330.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.109164,9320,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(EX((p35<1)) U EF(((p91>=1)||(p53>=1)))))) + EG(!(A(AX(((p12>=1)&&(p50>=1))) U ((EX((p82>=1)) + AX((p102>=1))) + (p74>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U ((p91>=1)||(p53>=1))))) * !(EX((p35<1)))) * !(E(TRUE U ((p91>=1)||(p53>=1))...479
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,1.26502,55352,1,0,226,209146,220,128,3105,130166,261
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4004883867672289928.gal : 0 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4045033401790176203.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4004883867672289928.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4045033401790176203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.105233,9396,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EX(A(!(((p62>=1)||(p26>=1))) U EX((p62>=1)))) + AX((p20<1))) + (E(A((p47>=1) U (p47>=1)) U AF((p74>=1))) + EG(EX(((p86>=1)||(p20>=1))...388
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,((EX(!((E(!(EX((p62>=1))) U (!(!(((p62>=1)||(p26>=1)))) * !(EX((p62>=1))))) + EG(!(EX((p62>=1))))...1027
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,3.62433,114568,1,0,1217,550322,236,195,2989,450673,1275
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:28] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/106 places, 97/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4458566629731341070.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability591706660983127991.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4458566629731341070.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability591706660983127991.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.102811,9444,2,4197,5,18582,6,0,510,16252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(!(E((((p22>=1)&&(p37>=1))||(p35>=1)) U ((p20>=1)||(p35>=1))))) + EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE))) * !(EG(!(E((((p22>=1)&&(p37>=1))||(p35>=1)) U ((p20>=1)||(p35>=1)))))))] = FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t12, t17, t23, t30, t36, t46, t53, t57, t62, t65, t68, t69, t74, t75, t81, t82, t85,...269
(forward)formula 0,1,3.35397,114552,1,0,1216,540716,219,215,2975,458660,1232
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [73, 76]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 104 /104 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 104/106 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5348455183898580987.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12473570416416582774.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5348455183898580987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12473570416416582774.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3708,0.07981,8064,2,3449,5,13293,6,0,515,10922,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(EX(EF((p47>=1)))) + E((p25<1) U EG((p76>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((p25<1) U EG((p76>=1))))) * !(E(TRUE U EX(E(TRUE U (p47>=1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t10, t17, t23, t30, t36, t43, t46, t53, t57, t58, t63, t66, t69, t70, t76, t82, t83, t86,...269
(forward)formula 0,0,1.86742,71740,1,0,1112,280576,227,130,3123,220183,1155
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-002-CTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2022-05-15 18:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-15 18:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Total runtime 40434 ms.

BK_STOP 1652638234611

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DoubleExponent-PT-002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DoubleExponent-PT-002, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r078-tall-165260109900170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DoubleExponent-PT-002.tgz
mv DoubleExponent-PT-002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;