fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
Execution of r024-tall-165251919100820
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
302.500 18019.00 30944.00 177.90 TFFFFFFFTTFFFFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r024-tall-165251919100820.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r024-tall-165251919100820
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 212K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Apr 29 12:33 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K Apr 29 12:33 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K Apr 29 12:32 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K Apr 29 12:32 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 07:14 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 9 07:14 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 9 07:14 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 07:14 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 9 07:14 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 9 07:14 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652694916722

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 09:55:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 09:55:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 46 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Transformed 25 places.
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Transformed 18 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 25 places and 18 transitions in 139 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 21 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 24 transition count 18
Applied a total of 1 rules in 9 ms. Remains 24 /25 variables (removed 1) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 24 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 24 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 24 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Computed 7 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 34 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 24/25 places, 18/18 transitions.
Support contains 21 out of 24 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
Finished random walk after 565 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 18 properties in 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 )
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X((F(p0)&&p1))&&(X(F(!(p2 U p3)))||F(p2))))'
Support contains 6 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 7 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 21/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 321 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) p3)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) p3), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (GEQ s8 1) (GEQ s14 1)), p1:(GEQ s15 1), p0:(GEQ s18 1), p3:(AND (GEQ s11 1) (GEQ s16 1))], nbAcceptance=0, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 1 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-01 finished in 444 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((X(p0)&&G(p1)))||G(p2)))'
Support contains 4 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 2 ms. Remains 21 /24 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:19] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 281 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(LT s9 1), p2:(LT s17 1), p0:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s14 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 784 reset in 313 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 792 reset in 168 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (AND p1 p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (AND p1 p2 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (AND p1 p2))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 903 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP to 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 256 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Finished random walk after 1900 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 9 properties in 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=135 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (AND p1 p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (AND p1 p2 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (AND p1 p2))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND p2 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p1))), (F (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (F (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (F (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 1021 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP to 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 235 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 251 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Support contains 4 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:22] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:22] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:23] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:23] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 29 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 20/20 places, 18/18 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (AND p2 p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND p2 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 889 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP to 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Finished random walk after 2054 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 9 properties in 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=128 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (AND p2 p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND p2 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (F (AND (NOT p1) p2)), (F (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (F (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 993 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP to 6 states, 20 edges and 3 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 280 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 230 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 234 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 840 reset in 144 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 798 reset in 210 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5574468990802865404
[2022-05-16 09:55:26] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5574468990802865404
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5574468990802865404;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 173 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5574468990802865404;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 39 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5574468990802865404;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2726248981241364948.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 293 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-02 finished in 7635 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(p0)||(F(p1)&&G(!(G(!p1) U !p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 8 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 22/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 230 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=5, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s11 1) (GEQ s17 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s14 1)), p1:(LT s20 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-03 finished in 356 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /24 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(GEQ s10 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-04 finished in 121 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X(F(X((G(((G(p0) U p1)||p2))&&p3))))))'
Support contains 7 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Drop transitions removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 16
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 20 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 19 transition count 15
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 19 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 18 transition count 14
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 12
Applied a total of 14 rules in 13 ms. Remains 16 /24 variables (removed 8) and now considering 12/18 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 16 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 16 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 16 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:27] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 31 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 16/24 places, 12/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 16/24 places, 12/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 333 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(OR (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}, { cond=(OR (AND p3 p2) (AND p3 p1) (AND p3 p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(OR (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={0, 1} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={1} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(OR (AND p3 p2) (AND p3 p1) (AND p3 p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)), acceptance={1} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (AND p3 p2 (NOT p0)) (AND p3 p1 (NOT p0))), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(OR (AND p3 p2 p0) (AND p3 p1 p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={0, 1} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)), acceptance={1} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)), acceptance={0, 1} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p3 p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p3 p2 (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p3 p2 (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0, 1} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={1} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(OR p2 p1 p0), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0, 1} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={1} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (AND p2 (NOT p0)) (AND p1 (NOT p0))), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(OR (AND p2 p0) (AND p1 p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0, 1} source=6 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={1} source=6 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=6 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=0, aps=[p3:(OR (LT s1 1) (LT s12 1)), p2:(GEQ s8 1), p1:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s11 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s14 1))], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true, true, true, true]]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 18299 steps with 2 reset in 45 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-05 finished in 510 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)&&(X(p1)||p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 22 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 19 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 18 transition count 14
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 18 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 12
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 15 transition count 11
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 15 /24 variables (removed 9) and now considering 11/18 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 15 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [10]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 14/24 places, 11/18 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 14 transition count 10
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 13 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 12 transition count 9
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 11 transition count 8
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 11 /14 variables (removed 3) and now considering 8/11 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 17 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 41 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 11/24 places, 8/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 11/24 places, 8/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s4 1) (GEQ s7 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s8 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 84 reset in 114 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 551 steps with 0 reset with depth 552 and stack size 549 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-06 finished in 325 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((F(p0) U (F(p0)&&p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 21 transition count 14
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 17 transition count 14
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 17 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 15 transition count 12
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 12 transition count 9
Applied a total of 21 rules in 4 ms. Remains 12 /24 variables (removed 12) and now considering 9/18 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 12 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [11]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 31 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 11/24 places, 9/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 11/24 places, 9/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s8 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s7 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11130 reset in 85 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11159 reset in 105 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 227 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Finished random walk after 63 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0), (F p1), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 292 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 57 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 61 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/8/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 8 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/8/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 16 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 4 out of 11 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 11/11 places, 9/9 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 23 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 20 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 11/11 places, 9/9 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 235 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 60 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Finished random walk after 63 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=31 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0), (F p1), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 307 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/8/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 11 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/8/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 4 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11186 reset in 65 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11106 reset in 118 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin18361569377424240628
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 9 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 9 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 9 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 09:55:30] [INFO ] Built C files in 4ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin18361569377424240628
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18361569377424240628;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 80 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin18361569377424240628;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 28 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin18361569377424240628;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17758488341934521709.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 73 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-08 finished in 2673 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(p1)&&p0) U !X((G(p2) U G(X(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 2 rules in 0 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 21/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[p1, p1, p1, (AND p2 p1), (AND p2 p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p2 p1), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(GEQ s9 1), p1:(AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s17 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 49 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 55 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge :(X (X (NOT p1)))
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 83 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-09 finished in 427 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G(!p0) U p1)||G(p1)))'
Support contains 4 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 21 transition count 17
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 20 transition count 15
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 18 transition count 15
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 18 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 14 transition count 11
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 13 transition count 10
Applied a total of 19 rules in 8 ms. Remains 13 /24 variables (removed 11) and now considering 10/18 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 13 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 13 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 13 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 22 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 13/24 places, 10/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 13/24 places, 10/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p1), true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s9 1)), p0:(AND (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s10 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-10 finished in 180 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((F(p0) U p0))&&X(X(G(p1)))&&X(p2)))'
Support contains 3 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /24 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s9 1), p2:(GEQ s15 1), p1:(GEQ s18 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 84 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-11 finished in 230 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(X(p1))&&X(F(G(F(p2))))&&p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /24 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 27 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 21/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s14 1)), p1:(GEQ s16 1), p2:(GEQ s9 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-13 finished in 270 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 21 transition count 13
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 16 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 15 transition count 12
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 15 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 13 transition count 10
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 9 transition count 6
Applied a total of 27 rules in 6 ms. Remains 9 /24 variables (removed 15) and now considering 6/18 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 9 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned [6, 8]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 7/24 places, 6/18 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 7 transition count 5
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 6 transition count 5
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 6 /7 variables (removed 1) and now considering 5/6 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 42 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 6/24 places, 5/18 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 6/24 places, 5/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s4 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 49 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24929 reset in 49 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 135 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 22 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 106 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 24 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Added : 2 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 33 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 6 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 6/6 places, 5/5 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 6 /6 variables (removed 0) and now considering 5/5 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 58 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 19 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 6/6 places, 5/5 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 92 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 26 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 22 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 )
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 39 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computed 2 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Added : 2 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 16 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 25 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25122 reset in 77 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25045 reset in 78 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin17611085160697261459
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 5 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 5 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 5 transitions.
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Built C files in 3ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin17611085160697261459
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17611085160697261459;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 71 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17611085160697261459;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 31 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin17611085160697261459;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9332015711131861972.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 270 ms.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1719 ms.
Running Spot : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltl2tgba' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)||p1)))'
Support contains 2 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 3 rules in 1 ms. Remains 21 /24 variables (removed 3) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Computed 4 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned [14]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 29 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 18/18 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 20/24 places, 18/18 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s6 1), p1:(GEQ s16 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2239 reset in 83 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2205 reset in 80 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 112 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP to 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 55 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Finished random walk after 559 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 )
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 39 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2022-05-16 09:55:34] [INFO ] Computed 3 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 09:55:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned unsat
Proved EG (NOT p0)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (G (NOT p0))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p0))
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 70 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP.
FORMULA ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1-LTLFireability-15 finished in 794 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 16761 ms.

BK_STOP 1652694934741

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r024-tall-165251919100820"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1.tgz
mv ClientsAndServers-PT-N0010P1 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;