Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r006-tajo-165245689300465.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-12a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300465
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 328K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K Apr 30 01:58 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Apr 30 01:58 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K Apr 30 01:51 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K Apr 30 01:51 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652662836672

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 112 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Transformed 307 places.
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Transformed 305 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 307 places and 305 transitions in 307 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 37 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 60 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 60 transitions.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 130 out of 307 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 307/307 places, 245/245 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 78 ms. Remains 307 /307 variables (removed 0) and now considering 245/245 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 307 cols
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Computed 76 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 346 ms returned [7, 21, 28, 42, 63, 70, 77, 90, 93, 96, 102, 105, 238, 244, 256, 274, 280, 286, 292, 304, 306]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 380 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 286/307 places, 245/245 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 280 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 280 transition count 239
Applied a total of 12 rules in 32 ms. Remains 280 /286 variables (removed 6) and now considering 239/245 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 280 cols
[2022-05-16 01:00:38] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 280 cols
[2022-05-16 01:00:39] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 01:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 202 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 357 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 280/307 places, 239/245 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 280/307 places, 239/245 transitions.
Support contains 130 out of 280 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 01:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
Support contains 125 out of 280 places (down from 130) after GAL structural reductions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 186 resets, run finished after 618 ms. (steps per millisecond=16 ) properties (out of 92) seen :50
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=500 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties (out of 42) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 42 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 280 cols
[2022-05-16 01:00:40] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 01:00:40] [INFO ] After 335ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:41
[2022-05-16 01:00:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 01:00:41] [INFO ] After 189ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :34 sat :8
[2022-05-16 01:00:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 01:00:41] [INFO ] After 83ms SMT Verify possible using 27 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :34 sat :8
[2022-05-16 01:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 343 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 01:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 119 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 511 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 80 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 243 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 73 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 99 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] After 1094ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :34 sat :8
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 107 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] After 1695ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :34 sat :8
Fused 42 Parikh solutions to 8 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 7 properties in 38 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 280 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 54 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 54 transitions
Performed 54 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 54
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 280 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 226 transition count 185
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 226 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 200 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 199 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 199 transition count 158
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 169 transition count 128
Free-agglomeration rule applied 30 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 169 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 139 transition count 98
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 139 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 133 transition count 92
Applied a total of 294 rules in 43 ms. Remains 133 /280 variables (removed 147) and now considering 92/239 (removed 147) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 133/280 places, 92/239 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 195 resets, run finished after 47 ms. (steps per millisecond=212 ) properties (out of 1) seen :0
Finished Best-First random walk after 1210 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=403 )
Successfully simplified 34 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 280 places (down from 77) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 13 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 26 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:00:42] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 243 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 258 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Applied a total of 14 rules in 20 ms. Remains 254 /261 variables (removed 7) and now considering 231/238 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 254 cols
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 343 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 254 cols
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 229 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 598 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 254/280 places, 231/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 254/280 places, 231/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 231 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality585007378005929961.gal : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 01:00:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14491323415721379763.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality585007378005929961.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14491323415721379763.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54779e+16,15.263,384944,2,38565,5,1.05419e+06,6,0,1249,2.47234e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(A((p185==1) U (p201==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((E(!((p201==1)) U (!((p185==1)) * !((p201==1)))) + EG(!((p201==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17899170200637417654.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17899170200637417654.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17899170200637417654.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17899170200637417654.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17899170200637417654.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:01:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:01:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:01:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 255 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13620272408473738698.gal : 20 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12514306533326672752.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13620272408473738698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12514306533326672752.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54779e+16,20.8172,623156,399,16,975830,223,417,2.58071e+06,30,503,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(A((i9.u63.p185==1) U (i11.i0.i0.u70.p201==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((E(!((i11.i0.i0.u70.p201==1)) U (!((i9.u63.p185==1)) * !((i11.i0.i0.u70.p201==1)))) + EG(!((i1...191
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u9.t41, i1.u15.t29, i2.u17.t25, i3.u14.t31, i3.u16.t27, i3.u18.t23, i3.u20.t19, i4.u21.t17...479
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 28 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:01:44] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 243 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 236 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 236 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 235 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 235 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 234 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 234 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 233 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 233 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 232 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 232 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 231 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 230 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 230 transition count 207
Applied a total of 62 rules in 241 ms. Remains 230 /261 variables (removed 31) and now considering 207/238 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 207 rows 230 cols
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 249 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 207 rows 230 cols
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 424 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 230/280 places, 207/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 230/280 places, 207/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 207 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2970283599707081611.gal : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:01:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3975379905506511659.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2970283599707081611.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3975379905506511659.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54763e+16,13.5492,374096,2,34817,5,982994,6,0,1129,2.45216e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AG(EF(((p209==0)||(p249==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((p209==0)||(p249==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15324840958396713862.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15324840958396713862.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15324840958396713862.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15324840958396713862.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15324840958396713862.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16990721404945331284.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7476285107808167782.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16990721404945331284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7476285107808167782.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54763e+16,0.342888,22756,330,16,37372,200,442,57906,30,402,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AG(EF(((i10.i0.u63.p209==0)||(i19.u78.p249==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((i10.i0.u63.p209==0)||(i19.u78.p249==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u0.t59, i0.u1.t57, i1.u5.t49, i2.u6.t47, i2.u8.t43, i3.u9.t41, i4.i0.u36.t85, i7.u2.t55, i...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,1,3.97864,146892,1,0,321202,200,2913,359787,133,402,349901
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:02:19] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 188 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 191 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 236 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 236 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 235 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 235 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 234 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 234 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 233 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 233 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 232 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 232 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 231 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 230 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 230 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 229 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 229 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 228 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 228 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 227 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 227 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 226 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 226 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 225 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 225 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 224 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 224 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 223 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 223 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 222 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 222 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 221 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 221 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 220 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 220 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 219 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 219 transition count 196
Applied a total of 84 rules in 176 ms. Remains 219 /261 variables (removed 42) and now considering 196/238 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 219 cols
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 219 cols
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 301 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 219/280 places, 196/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 219/280 places, 196/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14993845289286688911.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15743412399626157725.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14993845289286688911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15743412399626157725.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,12.9699,360652,2,36343,5,966103,6,0,1074,2.36952e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...298
(forward)formula 0,0,24.8447,372280,1,0,360,1.80669e+06,407,188,6014,2.36952e+06,398
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 50 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 50 transitions
Performed 50 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 50
Iterating post reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 280 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 230 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 228 transition count 187
Performed 24 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 24 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 228 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 204 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 203 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 203 transition count 162
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 175 transition count 134
Applied a total of 210 rules in 49 ms. Remains 175 /280 variables (removed 105) and now considering 134/239 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 134 rows 175 cols
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [10, 23, 32, 38, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, 101, 125, 136, 144, 148, 169]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 128 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/280 places, 134/239 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 147 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 120 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 118 transition count 105
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 118 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 116 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 115 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 115 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 114 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 114 transition count 101
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 113 transition count 100
Applied a total of 68 rules in 19 ms. Remains 113 /147 variables (removed 34) and now considering 100/134 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 113 cols
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Computed 27 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 113 cols
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Computed 27 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 113/280 places, 100/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 113/280 places, 100/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17228558430094261012.gal : 27 ms
[2022-05-16 01:02:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18266911655645003408.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17228558430094261012.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18266911655645003408.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.81331e+09,1.30558,51320,2,24769,5,161184,6,0,552,211746,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AF(((p211==0)&&(p219==1))) + (p119==0)) + ((AF((p66==1)) * ((p273==0)||(p154==1))) * (((p52==0)||(p52==1))&&((p2==0)||(p84==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(EG(!(((p211==0)&&(p219==1))))) + (p119==0)))),!((p66==1)))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(In...389
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t12, t27, t70, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inte...179
(forward)formula 0,0,23.8281,653600,1,0,786,3.81823e+06,228,368,3292,2.57283e+06,868
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 177 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 236 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 236 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 235 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 235 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 234 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 234 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 233 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 233 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 232 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 232 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 231 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 230 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 230 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 229 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 229 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 228 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 228 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 227 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 227 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 226 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 226 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 225 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 225 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 224 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 224 transition count 201
Applied a total of 74 rules in 126 ms. Remains 224 /261 variables (removed 37) and now considering 201/238 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 224 cols
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 224 cols
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 224/280 places, 201/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 224/280 places, 201/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17226995881396791374.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5883438508035527430.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17226995881396791374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5883438508035527430.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54759e+16,13.6201,352212,2,30392,5,909911,6,0,1099,2.30659e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(EG(((p157==0)||(p225==1)))) * AX(((p215==0)||((p40==0)&&(p220==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * EX(EG(((p157==0)||(p225==1))))) * !(EX(!(((p215==0)||((p40==0)&&(p220==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15892132721688326563.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15892132721688326563.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15892132721688326563.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15892132721688326563.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15892132721688326563.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5476533079497863816.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10544641444720096868.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5476533079497863816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10544641444720096868.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54759e+16,0.140031,12964,411,18,19423,204,429,23549,35,338,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(EG(((i8.i0.u51.p157==0)||(i13.u67.p225==1)))) * AX(((i7.i1.u63.p215==0)||((i13.u11.p40==0)&&(i12.u65.p220==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * EX(EG(((i8.i0.u51.p157==0)||(i13.u67.p225==1))))) * !(EX(!(((i7.i1.u63.p215==0)||((i13.u11.p40==0)...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u7.t45, i1.u9.t41, i2.u14.t31, i2.u16.t27, i3.u15.t29, i4.u18.t23, i4.u20.t19, i5.u36.t85,...510
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,1,12.8945,379776,1,0,658820,204,2771,796111,165,515,748462
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:03:53] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned [13, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 251, 273]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 164 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 264/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 259 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 259 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 258 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 258 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 257 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 257 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 256 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 256 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 255 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 255 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 254 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 254 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 253 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 253 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 252 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 252 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 251 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 251 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 250 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 250 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 249 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 249 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 248 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 248 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 247 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 247 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 246 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 246 transition count 220
Applied a total of 36 rules in 43 ms. Remains 246 /264 variables (removed 18) and now considering 220/238 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 246 cols
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Computed 40 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 246 cols
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Computed 40 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 344 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 246/280 places, 220/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 246/280 places, 220/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9719021652396028708.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:03:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2988880266117913015.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9719021652396028708.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2988880266117913015.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.6634e+16,15.2898,419524,2,58517,5,1.22869e+06,6,0,1202,2.56524e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14449237223697761499.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14449237223697761499.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14449237223697761499.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14449237223697761499.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14449237223697761499.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2402219501849303402.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1238550309297001277.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2402219501849303402.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1238550309297001277.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...253
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.6634e+16,14.0654,338660,351,25,672280,201,501,1.01127e+06,39,361,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((AF((!(EX(TRUE)) + !(E((i13.u0.p3==1) U ((i3.i2.u95.p111==0)||(i14.i1.u85.p259==1)))))) + AG(!(EG((i7.u56.p169==1)))))) U (!(EF((A((i...598
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(((((FwdU(Init,!((!(EG(!((!(EX(TRUE)) + !(E((i13.u0.p3==1) U ((i3.i2.u95.p111==0)||(i14.i1.u85.p259==1)))))...1381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u7.t45, i1.u10.t39, i1.u11.t37, i2.u13.t33, i3.i0.u18.t25, i3.i1.u22.t17, i4.u37.t85, i5.t...524
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,20.8574,338660,1,0,672280,309,3364,1.1435e+06,196,787,409920
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:04:45] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 165 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Applied a total of 38 rules in 40 ms. Remains 242 /261 variables (removed 19) and now considering 219/238 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 242 cols
[2022-05-16 01:04:45] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 242 cols
[2022-05-16 01:04:45] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 413 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 242/280 places, 219/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 242/280 places, 219/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 219 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2243937872477716550.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:04:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1508923462561967250.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2243937872477716550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1508923462561967250.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,18.3352,475848,2,34749,5,1.22388e+06,6,0,1189,3.10315e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11916808006662059944.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11916808006662059944.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11916808006662059944.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11916808006662059944.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11916808006662059944.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2844068338934138928.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17425237480833270479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2844068338934138928.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17425237480833270479.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,4.46181,156488,314,16,264618,186,458,645915,30,316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i19.u96.p296==0)||(i9.i1.u47.p152==1)) U E((E((((i4.u30.p103==0)||(i10.i1.u0.p1==1))||(i13.i0.u60.p197==1)) U (i14.u95.p294!=1)) + EF...241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((E((((i4.u30.p103==0)||(i10.i1.u0.p1==1))||(i13.i0.u60.p197==1)) U (i14.u95.p294!=1)) + E(TRU...690
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t193, i0.u1.t57, i1.u3.t53, i2.u11.t37, i3.i0.u10.t39, i3.i0.u12.t35, i3.i1.u14.t31, i3.i1.u1...520
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,9.04785,221696,1,0,425284,186,3300,835623,145,369,379445
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 93 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 93 transitions
Performed 93 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 93
Iterating post reduction 0 with 105 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 267 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 93 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 174 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 173 transition count 144
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 173 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 148 transition count 131
Drop transitions removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 148 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 136 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 135 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 135 transition count 118
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 105 transition count 88
Applied a total of 324 rules in 12 ms. Remains 105 /280 variables (removed 175) and now considering 88/239 (removed 151) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 105 cols
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Computed 31 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [60, 75, 82, 87, 90, 101]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/280 places, 88/239 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 88/88 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 99/280 places, 88/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
Finished random walk after 818 steps, including 28 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=272 )
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 19 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 191 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 256 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 256 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Applied a total of 28 rules in 23 ms. Remains 247 /261 variables (removed 14) and now considering 224/238 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 224 rows 247 cols
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 224 rows 247 cols
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 247/280 places, 224/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 247/280 places, 224/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 224 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:05:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11742760681662660401.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8746760867567074819.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11742760681662660401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8746760867567074819.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66342e+16,23.0453,544328,2,35310,5,1.36619e+06,6,0,1214,3.44976e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1250177823651883759.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1250177823651883759.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1250177823651883759.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1250177823651883759.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1250177823651883759.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12999287437949932975.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8313133274633719745.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12999287437949932975.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8313133274633719745.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66342e+16,1.26434,42764,352,16,85508,198,461,116052,31,361,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AG(((i13.u62.p263!=0)&&(i8.i1.u39.p193!=1))) + (i17.u13.p47==0)) + ((i0.u0.p2==1) + ((AX(FALSE) * (i11.i1.u60.p178==0)) * (i13.u103....167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!(E(TRUE U !(((i13.u62.p263!=0)&&(i8.i1.u39.p193!=1))))) + (i17.u13.p47==0)))) * !...517
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t94, i0.u0.t59, i0.u1.t57, i1.i0.u2.t55, i1.i0.u4.t51, i1.i1.u6.t47, i1.i1.u8.t43, i2.i0.u3.t...516
(forward)formula 0,0,1.33692,42764,1,0,85508,198,2727,116052,136,361,48184
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:05:57] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 148 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Applied a total of 26 rules in 35 ms. Remains 248 /261 variables (removed 13) and now considering 225/238 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 248 cols
[2022-05-16 01:05:57] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 248 cols
[2022-05-16 01:05:57] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 248/280 places, 225/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 248/280 places, 225/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:05:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 225 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:05:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3817412260704971575.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:05:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3769642949361767938.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3817412260704971575.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3769642949361767938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54775e+16,19.1183,509396,2,35303,5,1.30633e+06,6,0,1219,3.30456e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6183157733259365243.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6183157733259365243.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6183157733259365243.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6183157733259365243.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6183157733259365243.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11092310463898711011.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13588624011346990599.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11092310463898711011.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13588624011346990599.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...255
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54775e+16,0.114498,8336,344,18,7819,227,428,8740,35,449,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(!(E(EX(TRUE) U AF(((i5.u16.p57==0)||(i17.i1.u60.p191==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(EX(TRUE) U !(EG(!(((i5.u16.p57==0)||(i17.i1.u60.p191==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t92, i0.u1.t57, i1.u2.t55, i1.u4.t51, i2.u5.t49, i3.u9.t41, i4.u12.t35, i4.u13.t33, i5.u14.t3...484
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 105, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 218
Applied a total of 40 rules in 65 ms. Remains 241 /261 variables (removed 20) and now considering 218/238 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 241 cols
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Computed 37 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 241/280 places, 218/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 241/280 places, 218/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3818618489487755787.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:06:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1669053611113306071.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3818618489487755787.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1669053611113306071.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,14.5257,391712,2,29525,5,1.03155e+06,6,0,1184,2.5886e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!(AX(((p198==0)||(p48==1)))) U EF(EG((AF(((p254==0)||(p48==1))) * AF((p98==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U EG((!(EG(!(((p254==0)||(p48==1))))) * !(EG(!((p98==1))))))))) * !(!(!(EX(!(((p198==0)||...352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10371366264272718913.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10371366264272718913.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10371366264272718913.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10371366264272718913.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10371366264272718913.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5262904049128031703.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14598345192266413187.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5262904049128031703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14598345192266413187.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,2.85236,76432,341,16,143586,182,458,239646,30,299,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!(AX(((i9.i1.u60.p198==0)||(i17.u13.p48==1)))) U EF(EG((AF(((i20.u81.p254==0)||(i17.u13.p48==1))) * AF((i16.u28.p98==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U EG((!(EG(!(((i20.u81.p254==0)||(i17.u13.p48==1))))) * !(EG(!((i16.u28.p98==1))))))))) *...442
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u1.t57, i1.u8.t43, i1.u10.t39, i2.i0.u14.t31, i2.i0.u16.t27, i2.i1.u18.t23, i2.i1.u20.t19,...510
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,13.3571,397572,1,0,891079,182,3221,1.09103e+06,142,360,752348
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 280/280 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 279 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 279 transition count 238
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 279 /280 variables (removed 1) and now considering 238/239 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 279 cols
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Computed 55 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned [13, 32, 45, 52, 77, 80, 89, 96, 99, 102, 108, 170, 220, 235, 245, 251, 273]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 157 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/280 places, 238/239 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 257 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 257 transition count 233
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 257 /262 variables (removed 5) and now considering 233/238 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 257 cols
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Computed 38 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 257 cols
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Computed 38 place invariants in 4 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 257/280 places, 233/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 257/280 places, 233/239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 233 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12527741230184034044.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:07:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12825921494354264256.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12527741230184034044.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12825921494354264256.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54869e+16,19.1622,507988,2,61964,5,1.34988e+06,6,0,1261,3.30253e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17757090587247852109.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17757090587247852109.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17757090587247852109.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17757090587247852109.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17757090587247852109.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9407196844004698739.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 01:08:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10966142033029568386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9407196844004698739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10966142033029568386.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54869e+16,1.30109,47408,330,19,84640,223,467,126749,32,580,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF((i19.u88.p246==1)) * ((i12.i1.u50.p154==0)||(i21.u95.p267==1))) U EX((AG(((i14.i0.u8.p30==0)||(i0.u79.p220==1))) + A(((i20.i1.u105....210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((!(E(TRUE U !(((i14.i0.u8.p30==0)||(i0.u79.p220==1))))) + !((E(!((i10.i0.u36.p121==1)) U (!(...774
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t218, i0.u3.t53, i1.i0.u7.t45, i1.i1.u9.t41, i2.i0.u10.t39, i2.i0.u12.t35, i2.i1.u14.t31, i2....504
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2022-05-16 01:08:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 01:08:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 01:08:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:08:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17442624727279076378.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17442624727279076378.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17442624727279076378.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17442624727279076378.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17442624727279076378.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2022-05-16 01:08:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:08:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:08:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:08:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 01:08:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:08:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7214765019275017313.gal : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 01:08:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11603149488669597910.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7214765019275017313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11603149488669597910.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.128e+16,0.123143,9856,376,28,9418,1089,634,13688,60,2711,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(A((i15.i1.u67.p185==1) U (i13.i1.u72.p201==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((E(!((i13.i1.u72.p201==1)) U (!((i15.i1.u67.p185==1)) * !((i13.i1.u72.p201==1)))) + EG(!((i13....186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u0.t59, i0.u1.t57, i1.u3.t53, i2.i0.u6.t47, i2.i1.u7.t45, i2.i1.u9.t41, i3.u13.t33, i4.u15...510
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
(forward)formula 0,0,48.1651,1261796,1,0,1.84811e+06,1914,3844,2.76314e+06,290,4525,2099571
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(AF(!(E(EX(TRUE) U AF(((i19.i0.u17.p57==0)||(i13.i0.u69.p191==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(EX(TRUE) U !(EG(!(((i19.i0.u17.p57==0)||(i13.i0.u69.p191==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12126180070360032418.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 01:10:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7043266506069072930.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12126180070360032418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7043266506069072930.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...254
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.128e+16,3.1001,110084,2432,311,106784,5149,489,497383,334,14585,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(!(E(EX(TRUE) U AF(((u25.p57==0)||(u62.p191==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(EX(TRUE) U !(EG(!(((u25.p57==0)||(u62.p191==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t219, t220, u1.t59, u2.t57, u4.t55, u5.t53, u7.t51, u8.t49, u10.t47, u11.t45, u13.t43, u14.t4...384
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,168.501,2866900,1,0,5.16037e+06,82535,1161,1.13365e+07,945,370948,766183
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A((EF((u65.p246==1)) * ((u61.p154==0)||(u68.p267==1))) U EX((AG(((u13.p30==0)||(u62.p220==1))) + A(((u58.p117==0)||(u11.p25==1)) U (u61.p...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((!(E(TRUE U !(((u13.p30==0)||(u62.p220==1))))) + !((E(!((u61.p121==1)) U (!(((u58.p117==0)||...630
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2022-05-16 01:16:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 01:16:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
[2022-05-16 01:16:56] [INFO ] Transformed 280 places.
[2022-05-16 01:16:56] [INFO ] Transformed 239 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2022-05-16 01:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2423643239618077752.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 01:16:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3027271014518006214.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2423643239618077752.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3027271014518006214.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...319
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.128e+16,4.01759,121168,2,10686,5,349010,6,0,1337,559070,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF((p246==1)) * ((p154==0)||(p267==1))) U EX((AG(((p30==0)||(p220==1))) + A(((p117==0)||(p25==1)) U (p121==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((!(E(TRUE U !(((p30==0)||(p220==1))))) + !((E(!((p121==1)) U (!(((p117==0)||(p25==1))) * !((...534
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...294
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Total runtime 2340029 ms.

BK_STOP 1652665178165

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-12a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-12a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300465"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-12a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-12a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;