Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.r006-tajo-165245689300433.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2022-input.qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-4028
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300433
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 280K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Apr 30 02:17 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 30 02:17 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Apr 30 02:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K Apr 30 02:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 10 09:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 9 07:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 9 07:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 9 07:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 10 09:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 10 09:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 10 09:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1652661100787

Running Version 202205111006
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -spotpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt, -z3path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3, -yices2path, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Transformed 132 places.
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Transformed 130 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 132 places and 130 transitions in 168 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 25 transitions.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 90 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 132 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:42] [INFO ] Computed 34 place invariants in 14 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 35, 44, 47, 99, 105, 111, 117]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 276 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 120 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 120 transition count 103
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 120 /122 variables (removed 2) and now considering 103/105 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 120 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 120 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/132 places, 103/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 120/132 places, 103/105 transitions.
Support contains 90 out of 120 places after structural reductions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 317 resets, run finished after 769 ms. (steps per millisecond=13 ) properties (out of 72) seen :41
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 15 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=55 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1000 steps, including 3 resets, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=62 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=71 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=100 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 31) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 31) seen :1
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=77 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=250 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=91 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=200 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 22 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=125 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 20 ms. (steps per millisecond=50 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 4 resets, run finished after 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=83 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 1001 steps, including 5 resets, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=143 ) properties (out of 30) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 30 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 120 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:44] [INFO ] After 221ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:30
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 24 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] After 49ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :27 sat :3
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] After 16ms SMT Verify possible using 7 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :27 sat :3
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 68 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] After 120ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :27 sat :3
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization took 19 ms.
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] After 345ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :27 sat :3
Fused 30 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 32 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 120 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SAFETY mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 120 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 93 transition count 76
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 93 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 82 transition count 65
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 72 transition count 55
Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 72 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 62 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 61 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 3 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 42 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 19 transition count 21
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 19 transition count 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 14 transition count 16
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 12 transition count 14
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 12 transition count 14
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 12 transition count 12
Applied a total of 198 rules in 57 ms. Remains 12 /120 variables (removed 108) and now considering 12/103 (removed 91) transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 1 iterations. Remains : 12/120 places, 12/103 transitions.
Finished random walk after 11 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
Successfully simplified 27 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
Support contains 50 out of 120 places (down from 56) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 119 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 119 transition count 102
Applied a total of 2 rules in 13 ms. Remains 119 /120 variables (removed 1) and now considering 102/103 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [7, 34, 37, 44, 71, 110, 116, 118]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/120 places, 102/103 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 36 rules in 45 ms. Remains 93 /111 variables (removed 18) and now considering 84/102 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/120 places, 84/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 93/120 places, 84/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality668624577292332931.gal : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1201138142208845651.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality668624577292332931.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1201138142208845651.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.339317,14064,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((p2==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((p2==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,0.602942,16944,1,0,165,69580,185,83,2560,58770,175
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 119 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 119 transition count 102
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 119 /120 variables (removed 1) and now considering 102/103 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [7, 34, 37, 71, 110, 118]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/120 places, 102/103 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 111 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 111 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 110 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 110 transition count 99
Applied a total of 6 rules in 22 ms. Remains 110 /113 variables (removed 3) and now considering 99/102 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 110 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 18 place invariants in 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 110/120 places, 99/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 110/120 places, 99/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9251787180022528258.gal : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17766240417186757773.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9251787180022528258.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17766240417186757773.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.19808e+07,0.239943,15344,2,1440,5,38267,6,0,539,65629,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF(EG((p68==1))) * (EG((p119==0)) + (p80==0))) * (((p50==0)||(p6==1))&&(((p49==0)||(p18==1))||((p129==0)||(p129==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(((EY(Init) * (((p50==0)||(p6==1))&&(((p49==0)||(p18==1))||((p129==0)||(p129==1))))) * !(EG(!(EG((p68==1))...317
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t47, t61, t62, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,4.76746,151844,1,0,423,1.02621e+06,234,219,3193,623967,517
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 120 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 93 transition count 76
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 93 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 82 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 81 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 81 transition count 64
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 72 transition count 55
Applied a total of 96 rules in 28 ms. Remains 72 /120 variables (removed 48) and now considering 55/103 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 72 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [6, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 63, 69, 71]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/120 places, 55/103 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 60 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 52 transition count 47
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 52 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 51 transition count 46
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 49 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 49 transition count 44
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 47 transition count 42
Applied a total of 26 rules in 5 ms. Remains 47 /60 variables (removed 13) and now considering 42/55 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 47 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 47 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Computed 12 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 47/120 places, 42/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 47/120 places, 42/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1504383922424919991.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9704628854866648008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1504383922424919991.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9704628854866648008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,36353,0.023341,5380,2,369,5,3021,6,0,232,3226,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((AG(AF((p103==0))) + ((p2==0)&&(p77==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p103==0))))))) + ((p2==0)&&(p77==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t35, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.086133,7872,1,0,119,15087,113,64,1423,12043,167
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 120 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 99 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 97 transition count 80
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 97 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 86 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 85 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 85 transition count 68
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 77 transition count 60
Applied a total of 86 rules in 19 ms. Remains 77 /120 variables (removed 43) and now considering 60/103 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 77 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [5, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 44, 68, 74, 76]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/120 places, 60/103 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 64 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 56 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 54 transition count 50
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 53 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 53 transition count 49
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 51 transition count 47
Applied a total of 26 rules in 15 ms. Remains 51 /64 variables (removed 13) and now considering 47/60 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 51 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/120 places, 47/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 51/120 places, 47/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 47 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13899957399402119724.gal : 12 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14248782611105606786.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13899957399402119724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14248782611105606786.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,56833,0.018135,4932,2,489,5,2471,6,0,253,2478,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(AG(!(AG((p32==1)))) U ((p124==1) + (EG((((p109==0)||(p109==1))&&((p69==0)||(p17==1)))) * !((((p34==0)||(p15==1))&&((p63==0)||(p97==1...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p32==1)))))))) U ((p124==1) + (EG((((p109==0)||(p109==1))&&...241
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t40, t46, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inter...177
(forward)formula 0,0,0.597584,24600,1,0,354,127635,129,174,1550,116091,408
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 119 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 119 transition count 102
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /120 variables (removed 1) and now considering 102/103 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:52] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [34, 37, 44, 71, 110, 116, 118]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/120 places, 102/103 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 109 transition count 99
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 109 /112 variables (removed 3) and now considering 99/102 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 109 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 9 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 109 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Computed 17 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 109/120 places, 99/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 109/120 places, 99/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13257387185183703249.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16236888305109841053.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13257387185183703249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16236888305109841053.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.0124e+07,0.11476,10928,2,1125,5,22707,6,0,535,37144,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p52==1) + AX(AF(((p7==0)||(p30==1))))) U EG((p2==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,((p52==1) + !(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p7==0)||(p30==1)))))))))),(p2==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t48, t63, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
(forward)formula 0,0,3.91826,112156,1,0,670,736253,233,338,3042,635900,751
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 119 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 119 transition count 102
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /120 variables (removed 1) and now considering 102/103 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [7, 34, 37, 44, 71, 110, 116, 118]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/120 places, 102/103 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 106 transition count 97
Applied a total of 10 rules in 5 ms. Remains 106 /111 variables (removed 5) and now considering 97/102 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 15 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 106 cols
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 106/120 places, 97/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 106/120 places, 97/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18141187314812648630.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:31:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8140306996600548252.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18141187314812648630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8140306996600548252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...275
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.00585e+07,0.136192,11000,2,1183,5,22675,6,0,523,37116,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(((((((p90==0)||(p27==1))||(p75==1))&&((p33==0)||(p33==1)))||((p27==0)&&(p125==1)))||(((p15==1)&&((p60==0)||(p102==1)))||(p68==1)))...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((((((p90==0)||(p27==1))||(p75==1))&&((p33==0)||(p33==1)))||((p27==0)&&(p125==1)))||(((p15=...304
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t46, t59, t61, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,4.91728,121604,1,0,764,771602,232,378,3287,655826,873
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 115 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 88 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 86 transition count 73
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 86 transition count 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 70 transition count 62
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 70 transition count 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 66 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 65 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 65 transition count 57
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 55 transition count 47
Applied a total of 119 rules in 9 ms. Remains 55 /120 variables (removed 65) and now considering 47/103 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 55 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Computed 15 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [28, 48, 52, 54]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/120 places, 47/103 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 51 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 50 transition count 46
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 48 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 44
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 47 transition count 43
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 47 /51 variables (removed 4) and now considering 43/47 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 47 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 47 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Computed 11 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 47/120 places, 43/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 47/120 places, 43/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11196414214977847706.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality28031584136091733.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11196414214977847706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality28031584136091733.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,27648,0.011084,4572,2,132,5,998,6,0,234,880,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((p121==0)) * ((EF((p66==1)) + (p73==0)) + (p90==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p121==0)))] = FALSE * [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p90==1))) * !((p73==0))) * !(E(TRUE U (...175
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 41/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.031679,5772,1,0,15,5557,29,9,1180,3269,13
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 119 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 119 transition count 102
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /120 variables (removed 1) and now considering 102/103 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [7, 34, 37, 44, 71, 110, 116, 118]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 95 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/120 places, 102/103 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 99
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 108 /111 variables (removed 3) and now considering 99/102 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 108 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/120 places, 99/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 108/120 places, 99/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13652644417974343310.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16249070867243527876.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13652644417974343310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16249070867243527876.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.0124e+07,0.192232,11960,2,1230,5,26050,6,0,533,42329,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(((((p107==0)||(p74==1))&&(p58!=0))&&(p79!=1))) + (AG(EX(((p92==0)&&(p15==1)))) * EF(AX(((p61==0)&&(p63==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((((p107==0)||(p74==1))&&(p58!=0))&&(p79!=1))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE...251
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t48, t63, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
(forward)formula 0,1,0.463288,17360,1,0,179,67702,215,98,2936,48763,205
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 119 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 119 transition count 102
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 119 /120 variables (removed 1) and now considering 102/103 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [7, 34, 37, 44, 71, 110, 116, 118]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 171 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/120 places, 102/103 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 36 rules in 20 ms. Remains 93 /111 variables (removed 18) and now considering 84/102 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 188 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/120 places, 84/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 93/120 places, 84/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4670453103322269528.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7308698075606147580.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4670453103322269528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7308698075606147580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...274
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.310909,14140,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(AX(FALSE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(EX(!(FALSE))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,0.737029,24040,1,0,165,86632,184,83,2751,102241,177
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 120 /120 variables (removed 0) and now considering 103/103 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 120 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:04] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [7, 34, 37, 44, 71, 111, 117, 119]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 101 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 109 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 109 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 103 transition count 94
Applied a total of 18 rules in 7 ms. Remains 103 /112 variables (removed 9) and now considering 94/103 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:04] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 103 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:04] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 10 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/120 places, 94/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 103/120 places, 94/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality674398894837806786.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3544870153744017648.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality674398894837806786.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3544870153744017648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...273
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.1817e+07,0.224905,12128,2,1603,5,26114,6,0,508,42159,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((A(EG((p112==1)) U (!(((p48==0)||(p32==1))) + EF((p109==1)))) * AG(EF((p114==1)))) U (EG(EX(((p58==0)||(p26==1)))) + (AG(((p93==0)||...240
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!((E(!((!(((p48==0)||(p32==1))) + E(TRUE U (p109==1)))) U (!(EG((p112==1))) * !((!(((p4...453
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t58, t74, t83, Intersection with reachable a...223
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,24.6401,607380,1,0,763,4.14689e+06,235,499,3172,2.72097e+06,977
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 119 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 119 transition count 102
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /120 variables (removed 1) and now considering 102/103 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 119 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Computed 24 place invariants in 2 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [7, 34, 37, 44, 71, 110, 116, 118]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/120 places, 102/103 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 36 rules in 8 ms. Remains 93 /111 variables (removed 18) and now considering 84/102 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Computed 16 place invariants in 0 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/120 places, 84/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions, in 2 iterations. Remains : 93/120 places, 84/103 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14372256145469240836.gal : 1 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15168559331056481931.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14372256145469240836.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15168559331056481931.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202205111006/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -i /tmp/C...276
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.281458,13888,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((p115==1) + EF((p127==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((p115==1))) * !(E(TRUE U (p127==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,0.537413,17768,1,0,163,72536,189,81,2618,58770,178
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2022-05-16 00:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 48393 ms.

BK_STOP 1652661151092

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export LANG=C
+ LANG=C
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202205111006.jar
+ VERSION=202205111006
+ echo 'Running Version 202205111006'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -data @none -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -spotpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//ltlfilt -z3path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//z3/bin/z3 -yices2path /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//yices/bin/yices -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600 -vmargs -Dosgi.locking=none -Declipse.stateSaveDelayInterval=-1 -Dosgi.configuration.area=@none -Xss128m -Xms40m -Xmx8192m

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-4028"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r006-tajo-165245689300433"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;