fond
Model Checking Contest 2022
12th edition, Bergen, Norway, June 21, 2022
GreatSPN compared to other tools («Surprise» models, LTLFireability)
Last Updated
Jun 22, 2022

Introduction

This page presents how GreatSPN do cope efficiently with the LTLFireability examination face to the other participating tools. In this page, we consider «Surprise» models.

The next sections will show chart comparing performances in terms of both memory and execution time.The x-axis corresponds to the challenging tool where the y-axes represents GreatSPN' performances. Thus, points below the diagonal of a chart denote comparisons favorables to the tool while others corresponds to situations where the challenging tool performs better.

You might also find plots out of the range that denote the case were at least one tool could not answer appropriately (error, time-out, could not compute or did not competed).

GreatSPN versus ITS-Tools

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for GreatSPN and 206 for ITS-Tools, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing GreatSPN to ITS-Tools are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  GreatSPN ITS-Tools Both tools   GreatSPN ITS-Tools
All computed OK 0 131 49   Smallest Memory Footprint
GreatSPN = ITS-Tools 1 Times tool wins 34 172
GreatSPN > ITS-Tools 4   Shortest Execution Time
GreatSPN < ITS-Tools 21 Times tool wins 42 164
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 14 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 117 0 0


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where GreatSPN computed more values than ITS-Tools, denote cases where GreatSPN computed less values than ITS-Tools, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

GreatSPN wins when points are below the diagonal, ITS-Tools wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

GreatSPN versus Tapaal

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for GreatSPN and 206 for Tapaal, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing GreatSPN to Tapaal are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  GreatSPN Tapaal Both tools   GreatSPN Tapaal
All computed OK 0 131 44   Smallest Memory Footprint
GreatSPN = Tapaal 1 Times tool wins 24 182
GreatSPN > Tapaal 9   Shortest Execution Time
GreatSPN < Tapaal 21 Times tool wins 44 162
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 14 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 117 0 0


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where GreatSPN computed more values than Tapaal, denote cases where GreatSPN computed less values than Tapaal, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

GreatSPN wins when points are below the diagonal, Tapaal wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

GreatSPN versus enPAC

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for GreatSPN and 206 for enPAC, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing GreatSPN to enPAC are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  GreatSPN enPAC Both tools   GreatSPN enPAC
All computed OK 0 123 29   Smallest Memory Footprint
GreatSPN = enPAC 1 Times tool wins 33 165
GreatSPN > enPAC 29   Shortest Execution Time
GreatSPN < enPAC 16 Times tool wins 53 145
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 14 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 109 0 8


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where GreatSPN computed more values than enPAC, denote cases where GreatSPN computed less values than enPAC, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

GreatSPN wins when points are below the diagonal, enPAC wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart

GreatSPN versus 2021-gold

Some statistics are displayed below, based on 412 runs (206 for GreatSPN and 206 for 2021-gold, so there are 206 plots on each of the two charts). Each execution was allowed 1 hour and 16 GByte of memory. Then performance charts comparing GreatSPN to 2021-gold are shown (you may click on one graph to enlarge it).

Statistics on the executions
  GreatSPN 2021-gold Both tools   GreatSPN 2021-gold
All computed OK 0 131 39   Smallest Memory Footprint
GreatSPN = 2021-gold 2 Times tool wins 34 172
GreatSPN > 2021-gold 14   Shortest Execution Time
GreatSPN < 2021-gold 20 Times tool wins 52 154
Do not compete 0 0 0
Error detected 14 0 0  
Cannot Compute + Time-out 117 0 0


On the chart below, denote cases where the two tools did computed all results without error, denote cases where the two tool did computed the same number of values (but not al values in the examination), denote cases where GreatSPN computed more values than 2021-gold, denote cases where GreatSPN computed less values than 2021-gold, denote the cases where at least one tool did not competed, denote the cases where at least one tool computed a bad value and denote the cases where at least one tool stated it could not compute a result or timed-out.

GreatSPN wins when points are below the diagonal, 2021-gold wins when points are above the diagonal.

memory chart time chart